IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2502.19305.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corporate Fraud Detection in Rich-yet-Noisy Financial Graph

Author

Listed:
  • Shiqi Wang
  • Zhibo Zhang
  • Libing Fang
  • Cam-Tu Nguyen
  • Wenzhon Li

Abstract

Corporate fraud detection aims to automatically recognize companies that conduct wrongful activities such as fraudulent financial statements or illegal insider trading. Previous learning-based methods fail to effectively integrate rich interactions in the company network. To close this gap, we collect 18-year financial records in China to form three graph datasets with fraud labels. We analyze the characteristics of the financial graphs, highlighting two pronounced issues: (1) information overload: the dominance of (noisy) non-company nodes over company nodes hinders the message-passing process in Graph Convolution Networks (GCN); and (2) hidden fraud: there exists a large percentage of possible undetected violations in the collected data. The hidden fraud problem will introduce noisy labels in the training dataset and compromise fraud detection results. To handle such challenges, we propose a novel graph-based method, namely, Knowledge-enhanced GCN with Robust Two-stage Learning (${\rm KeGCN}_{R}$), which leverages Knowledge Graph Embeddings to mitigate the information overload and effectively learns rich representations. The proposed model adopts a two-stage learning method to enhance robustness against hidden frauds. Extensive experimental results not only confirm the importance of interactions but also show the superiority of ${\rm KeGCN}_{R}$ over a number of strong baselines in terms of fraud detection effectiveness and robustness.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiqi Wang & Zhibo Zhang & Libing Fang & Cam-Tu Nguyen & Wenzhon Li, 2025. "Corporate Fraud Detection in Rich-yet-Noisy Financial Graph," Papers 2502.19305, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2502.19305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.19305
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claessens, Stijn & Fan, Joseph P.H. & Lang, Larry H.P., 2006. "The benefits and costs of group affiliation: Evidence from East Asia," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Lee, Bong-Soo & Rui, Oliver Meng & Wang, Steven Shuye, 2004. "Information transmission between the NASDAQ and Asian second board markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1637-1670, July.
    3. Messod D. Beneish, 1999. "The Detection of Earnings Manipulation," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 24-36, September.
    4. Patricia M. Dechow & Weili Ge & Chad R. Larson & Richard G. Sloan, 2011. "Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 17-82, March.
    5. Vikramaditya Khanna & E. Han Kim & Yao Lu, 2015. "CEO Connectedness and Corporate Fraud," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(3), pages 1203-1252, June.
    6. Hatice Uzun & Samuel H. Szewczyk & Raj Varma, 2004. "Board Composition and Corporate Fraud," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(3), pages 33-43, May.
    7. Xin‐Ping Song & Zhi‐Hua Hu & Jian‐Guo Du & Zhao‐Han Sheng, 2014. "Application of Machine Learning Methods to Risk Assessment of Financial Statement Fraud: Evidence from China," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), pages 611-626, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Dyck & Adair Morse & Luigi Zingales, 2024. "How pervasive is corporate fraud?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 736-769, March.
    2. Kuvvet, Emre & Maskara, Pankaj Kumar, 2018. "Former members of the U.S. Congress and fraud enforcement: Does it help to have politically connected friends on the board?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 77-89.
    3. Xin Xu & Feng Xiong & Zhe An, 2023. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Corporate Fraud: Evidence Based on the GONE Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 137-158, August.
    4. Yunchuan Sun & Xiaoping Zeng & Ying Xu & Hong Yue & Xipu Yu, 2024. "An intelligent detecting model for financial frauds in Chinese A‐share market," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 1110-1136, July.
    5. Patrick Velte, 2023. "The link between corporate governance and corporate financial misconduct. A review of archival studies and implications for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 353-411, February.
    6. Dan Amiram & Zahn Bozanic & James D. Cox & Quentin Dupont & Jonathan M. Karpoff & Richard Sloan, 2018. "Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: a multidisciplinary review of the literature," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 732-783, June.
    7. Jian Zhang, 2018. "Public Governance and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Recent Anti-corruption Campaign in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 375-396, March.
    8. repec:osf:socarx:48g5c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Rind, Asad Ali & Abbassi, Wajih & Allaya, Manel & Hammouda, Amira, 2022. "Local peers and firm misconduct: The role of sustainability and competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    10. Zhang, Yi & Liu, Tianxiang & Li, Weiping, 2024. "Corporate fraud detection based on linguistic readability vector: Application to financial companies in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    11. Kuang, Yu Flora & Lee, Gladys, 2017. "Corporate fraud and external social connectedness of independent directors," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 401-427.
    12. Li, Guowen & Wang, Shuai & Feng, Yuyao, 2024. "Making differences work: Financial fraud detection based on multi-subject perceptions," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Ilia Dichev & Edward Owens, 2025. "Accrual duration," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 611-649, March.
    14. Yasheng Chen & Zhuojun Wu, 2022. "Financial Fraud Detection of Listed Companies in China: A Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Zhang, Jian & Wang, Jialong & Kong, Dongmin, 2020. "Employee treatment and corporate fraud," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 325-334.
    16. Zou, Na, 2020. "Anticorruption efforts and corporate fraud," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224619, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. Jae Hwan Ahn, 2022. "The road not taken: A comparison of Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases and securities class actions," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(9-10), pages 1489-1529, October.
    18. Sonika Gupta & Sushil Kumar Mehta, 2024. "Data Mining-based Financial Statement Fraud Detection: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis to Estimate Data Sample Mapping of Fraudulent Companies Against Non-fraudulent Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(5), pages 1290-1313, October.
    19. Quentin Dupont & Jonathan M. Karpoff, 2020. "The Trust Triangle: Laws, Reputation, and Culture in Empirical Finance Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 217-238, May.
    20. Rahman, Md Jahidur & Zhu, Hongtao, 2024. "Detecting accounting fraud in family firms: Evidence from machine learning approaches," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    21. Md Jahidur Rahman & Hongtao Zhu, 2023. "Predicting accounting fraud using imbalanced ensemble learning classifiers – evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3455-3486, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2502.19305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.