IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2506.08762.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial Statements

Author

Listed:
  • Issa Sugiura
  • Takashi Ishida
  • Taro Makino
  • Chieko Tazuke
  • Takanori Nakagawa
  • Kosuke Nakago
  • David Ha

Abstract

Financial analysis presents complex challenges that could leverage large language model (LLM) capabilities. However, the scarcity of challenging financial datasets, particularly for Japanese financial data, impedes academic innovation in financial analytics. As LLMs advance, this lack of accessible research resources increasingly hinders their development and evaluation in this specialized domain. To address this gap, we introduce EDINET-Bench, an open-source Japanese financial benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of LLMs on challenging financial tasks including accounting fraud detection, earnings forecasting, and industry prediction. EDINET-Bench is constructed by downloading annual reports from the past 10 years from Japan's Electronic Disclosure for Investors' NETwork (EDINET) and automatically assigning labels corresponding to each evaluation task. Our experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art LLMs struggle, performing only slightly better than logistic regression in binary classification for fraud detection and earnings forecasting. These results highlight significant challenges in applying LLMs to real-world financial applications and underscore the need for domain-specific adaptation. Our dataset, benchmark construction code, and evaluation code is publicly available to facilitate future research in finance with LLMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Issa Sugiura & Takashi Ishida & Taro Makino & Chieko Tazuke & Takanori Nakagawa & Kosuke Nakago & David Ha, 2025. "EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial Statements," Papers 2506.08762, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2506.08762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.08762
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Heijden, Hans, 2022. "Predicting industry sectors from financial statements: An illustration of machine learning in accounting research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    2. Messod D. Beneish, 1999. "The Detection of Earnings Manipulation," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 24-36, September.
    3. Shijie Wu & Ozan Irsoy & Steven Lu & Vadim Dabravolski & Mark Dredze & Sebastian Gehrmann & Prabhanjan Kambadur & David Rosenberg & Gideon Mann, 2023. "BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance," Papers 2303.17564, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    4. Patricia M. Dechow & Weili Ge & Chad R. Larson & Richard G. Sloan, 2011. "Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 17-82, March.
    5. Monahan, Steven J., 2018. "Financial Statement Analysis and Earnings Forecasting," Foundations and Trends(R) in Accounting, now publishers, vol. 12(2), pages 105-215, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Dyck & Adair Morse & Luigi Zingales, 2024. "How pervasive is corporate fraud?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 736-769, March.
    2. repec:osf:socarx:48g5c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Zhang, Yi & Liu, Tianxiang & Li, Weiping, 2024. "Corporate fraud detection based on linguistic readability vector: Application to financial companies in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    4. Bidisha Chakrabarty & Pamela C. Moulton & Leonid Pugachev & Xu (Frank) Wang, 2025. "Catch me if you can: In search of accuracy, scope, and ease of fraud prediction," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1268-1308, June.
    5. Zhang, Zejun & Wang, Zhao & Cai, Lixin, 2025. "Predicting financial fraud in Chinese listed companies: An enterprise portrait and machine learning approach," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Li, Guowen & Wang, Shuai & Feng, Yuyao, 2024. "Making differences work: Financial fraud detection based on multi-subject perceptions," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Ilia Dichev & Edward Owens, 2025. "Accrual duration," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 611-649, March.
    8. Lokanan, Mark & Sharma, Satish, 2025. "Reprint of: The use of machine learning algorithms to predict financial statement fraud," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    9. Shiqi Wang & Zhibo Zhang & Libing Fang & Cam-Tu Nguyen & Wenzhong Li, 2025. "Corporate Fraud Detection in Rich-yet-Noisy Financial Graph," Papers 2502.19305, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    10. Sonika Gupta & Sushil Kumar Mehta, 2024. "Data Mining-based Financial Statement Fraud Detection: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis to Estimate Data Sample Mapping of Fraudulent Companies Against Non-fraudulent Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(5), pages 1290-1313, October.
    11. Rahman, Md Jahidur & Zhu, Hongtao, 2024. "Detecting accounting fraud in family firms: Evidence from machine learning approaches," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Slavko ?odan, 0000. "Can Accrual-based Metrics Indicate Material Accounting Misstatements? Evidence on Audit Adjustments," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 14416287, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    13. Cheng-Wen Lee & Mao-Wen Fu & Chin-Chuan Wang & Muh. Irfandy Azis, 2025. "Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms for Financial Fraud Detection: Insights from Indonesia," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-35, February.
    14. Zhao, Dongshuai & Wang, Zhongli & Schweizer-Gamborino, Florian & Sornette, Didier, 2025. "Polytope Fraud Theory," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    15. repec:osf:osfxxx:kecmv_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Nguyen Huu Anh & Nguyen Ha Linh & Sung Wook Yoon, 2018. "Earnings Manipulation Benchmark For Nonfinancial Listed Companies In Vietnamese Stock Market," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 10(1), pages 39-49.
    17. Wei, Lang & Zhang, Yiling, 2023. "Nonfinancial indicators in identifying stock price crash risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    18. Xiaowei Chen & Cong Zhai, 2023. "Bagging or boosting? Empirical evidence from financial statement fraud detection," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 5093-5142, December.
    19. Ahmed M. Abdalla & Colin D. B. Clubb, 2024. "Classification shifting using income-decreasing special items: measurement and valuation issues," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 2871-2926, September.
    20. Abdul‐Rahman Khokhar & Hesam Shahriari, 2022. "Is the SEC captured? Evidence from political connectedness and SEC enforcement actions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2725-2756, June.
    21. Alessandro Paolo Rigamonti & Giulio Greco & Mariarita Pierotti & Alessandro Capocchi, 2024. "Macroeconomic uncertainty and earnings management: evidence from commodity firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1615-1649, May.
    22. Ching-Nam Hang & Pei-Duo Yu & Roberto Morabito & Chee-Wei Tan, 2024. "Large Language Models Meet Next-Generation Networking Technologies: A Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2506.08762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.