IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i4p600-d1589542.html

Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms for Financial Fraud Detection: Insights from Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng-Wen Lee

    (Department of International Business, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan)

  • Mao-Wen Fu

    (Ph.D. Program in Business, College of Business, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan)

  • Chin-Chuan Wang

    (Ph.D. Program in Business, College of Business, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan)

  • Muh. Irfandy Azis

    (Department of Accounting, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Tarakan 77123, Indonesia)

Abstract

The study utilized Multiple Linear Regression along with advanced classification algorithms such as Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, and Random Forest, to detect financial statement fraud. Model performance was evaluated using key metrics, including precision, recall, accuracy, and F1-Score. The analysis also identified significant indicators of fraud, such as Accounts Receivable Turnover, Days Outstanding Accounts Receivable, Days Payables Outstanding, Logarithm of Gross Profit, Gross Profit Margin, Inventory to Sales Ratio, and Total Asset Turnover. Among the models, Random Forest emerged as the most effective algorithm, consistently outperforming others on both training and testing datasets. Logistic Regression and SVM demonstrated strong reliability, whereas KNN and Decision Tree faced overfitting challenges, limiting their practical application. These findings emphasize the critical need for enhanced fraud detection frameworks, leveraging machine learning algorithms like Random Forest to identify fraud patterns effectively. The study highlights the importance of strengthening internal controls, implementing targeted fraud detection measures, and promoting regulatory improvements to enhance transparency and financial accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng-Wen Lee & Mao-Wen Fu & Chin-Chuan Wang & Muh. Irfandy Azis, 2025. "Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms for Financial Fraud Detection: Insights from Indonesia," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-35, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:600-:d:1589542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/4/600/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/4/600/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. NIAMH M. BRENNAN & MARY McGRATH, 2007. "Financial Statement Fraud: Some Lessons from US and European Case Studies," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(42), pages 49-61, July.
    2. Messod D. Beneish, 1999. "The Detection of Earnings Manipulation," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 24-36, September.
    3. M. Brownbridge & C. Kirkpatrick, 2000. "Financial Regulation in Developing Countries," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Craja, Patricia & Kim, Alisa & Lessmann, Stefan, 2020. "Deep Learning application for fraud detection in financial statements," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2020-007, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    5. Peter Tickner & Mark Button, 2021. "Deconstructing the origins of Cressey’s Fraud Triangle," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3), pages 722-731, June.
    6. Patricia M. Dechow & Weili Ge & Chad R. Larson & Richard G. Sloan, 2011. "Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 17-82, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam Nassif & Pasidu Dharmasena & Nabil Nassif, 2025. "Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Heating Coil Performance in Building Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Esmeralda Brati & Alma Braimllari & Ardit Gjeçi, 2025. "Machine Learning Applications for Predicting High-Cost Claims Using Insurance Data," Data, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Zejun & Wang, Zhao & Cai, Lixin, 2025. "Predicting financial fraud in Chinese listed companies: An enterprise portrait and machine learning approach," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Alexander Dyck & Adair Morse & Luigi Zingales, 2024. "How pervasive is corporate fraud?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 736-769, March.
    3. Anas Alqudah & Safa Jaradat & Lara Al-Haddad, 2025. "Financial Consequences of Fraud in Amman Stock Exchange Firms," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 29(1), pages 83-111, March.
    4. Almina Doko & Rezarta Shkurti, 2025. "Detecting financial statement manipulation in SMEs: evidence from Albania," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 787-813, December.
    5. Cebi, Selcuk & Karakurt, Necip Fazıl & Kurtulus, Erkan & Tokgoz, Bunyamin, 2024. "Development of a decision support system for client acceptance in independent audit process," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. repec:osf:socarx:48g5c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Dan Amiram & Zahn Bozanic & Ethan Rouen, 2015. "Financial statement errors: evidence from the distributional properties of financial statement numbers," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1540-1593, December.
    8. Zhang, Yi & Liu, Tianxiang & Li, Weiping, 2024. "Corporate fraud detection based on linguistic readability vector: Application to financial companies in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    9. Bidisha Chakrabarty & Pamela C. Moulton & Leonid Pugachev & Xu (Frank) Wang, 2025. "Catch me if you can: In search of accuracy, scope, and ease of fraud prediction," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1268-1308, June.
    10. Su, Huishui & Jiang, I-Ming & Liu, Duan, 2025. "Detecting financial fraud risk using machine learning: Evidence based on different categories and matching samples," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    11. Issa Sugiura & Takashi Ishida & Taro Makino & Chieko Tazuke & Takanori Nakagawa & Kosuke Nakago & David Ha, 2025. "EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial Statements," Papers 2506.08762, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    12. Li, Guowen & Wang, Shuai & Feng, Yuyao, 2024. "Making differences work: Financial fraud detection based on multi-subject perceptions," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Li, Jingyu & Guo, Ce & Lv, Sijia & Xie, Qiwei & Zheng, Xiaolong, 2024. "Financial fraud detection for Chinese listed firms: Does managers' abnormal tone matter?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Abdullah Albizri & Deniz Appelbaum & Nicholas Rizzotto, 2019. "Evaluation of financial statements fraud detection research: a multi-disciplinary analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 206-241, December.
    15. Ilia Dichev & Edward Owens, 2025. "Accrual duration," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 611-649, March.
    16. Lokanan, Mark & Sharma, Satish, 2025. "Reprint of: The use of machine learning algorithms to predict financial statement fraud," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    17. Shiqi Wang & Zhibo Zhang & Libing Fang & Cam-Tu Nguyen & Wenzhong Li, 2025. "Corporate Fraud Detection in Rich-yet-Noisy Financial Graph," Papers 2502.19305, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    18. Sonika Gupta & Sushil Kumar Mehta, 2024. "Data Mining-based Financial Statement Fraud Detection: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis to Estimate Data Sample Mapping of Fraudulent Companies Against Non-fraudulent Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(5), pages 1290-1313, October.
    19. Rahman, Md Jahidur & Zhu, Hongtao, 2024. "Detecting accounting fraud in family firms: Evidence from machine learning approaches," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Slavko ?odan, 0000. "Can Accrual-based Metrics Indicate Material Accounting Misstatements? Evidence on Audit Adjustments," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 14416287, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    21. Zhao, Dongshuai & Wang, Zhongli & Schweizer-Gamborino, Florian & Sornette, Didier, 2025. "Polytope Fraud Theory," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:600-:d:1589542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.