IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2412.02251.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Selective Reviews of Bandit Problems in AI via a Statistical View

Author

Listed:
  • Pengjie Zhou
  • Haoyu Wei
  • Huiming Zhang

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a widely researched area in artificial intelligence that focuses on teaching agents decision-making through interactions with their environment. A key subset includes stochastic multi-armed bandit (MAB) and continuum-armed bandit (SCAB) problems, which model sequential decision-making under uncertainty. This review outlines the foundational models and assumptions of bandit problems, explores non-asymptotic theoretical tools like concentration inequalities and minimax regret bounds, and compares frequentist and Bayesian algorithms for managing exploration-exploitation trade-offs. We also extend the discussion to $K$-armed contextual bandits and SCAB, examining their methodologies, regret analyses, and discussing the relation between the SCAB problems and the functional data analysis. Finally, we highlight recent advances and ongoing challenges in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengjie Zhou & Haoyu Wei & Huiming Zhang, 2024. "Selective Reviews of Bandit Problems in AI via a Statistical View," Papers 2412.02251, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.02251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.02251
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.02251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.