IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v44y2025i5p995-1016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

LOLA: LLM-Assisted Online Learning Algorithm for Content Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Zikun Ye

    (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Hema Yoganarasimhan

    (University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Yufeng Zheng

    (University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada)

Abstract

Modern media firms require automated and efficient methods to identify content that is most engaging and appealing to users. Leveraging a large-scale data set from Upworthy (a news publisher), which includes 17,681 headline A/B tests, we first investigate the ability of three pure–large language model (LLM) approaches to identify the catchiest headline: prompt-based methods, embedding-based methods, and fine-tuned open-source LLMs. Prompt-based approaches perform poorly, while both OpenAI embedding–based models and the fine-tuned Llama-3-8B achieve marginally higher accuracy than random predictions. In sum, none of the pure LLM–based methods can predict the best-performing headline with high accuracy. We then introduce the LLM-assisted online learning algorithm (LOLA), a novel framework that integrates LLMs with adaptive experimentation to optimize content delivery. LOLA combines the best pure-LLM approach with the upper confidence bound algorithm to allocate traffic and maximize clicks adaptively. Our numerical experiments on Upworthy data show that LOLA outperforms the standard A/B test method (the current status quo at Upworthy), pure bandit algorithms, and pure-LLM approaches, particularly in scenarios with limited experimental traffic. Our approach is scalable and applicable to content experiments across various settings where firms seek to optimize user engagement, including digital advertising and social media recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zikun Ye & Hema Yoganarasimhan & Yufeng Zheng, 2025. "LOLA: LLM-Assisted Online Learning Algorithm for Content Experiments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(5), pages 995-1016, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:5:p:995-1016
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2024.0990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2024.0990
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2024.0990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:5:p:995-1016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.