IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2410.19002.html

Stochastic cooperative games of risk averse players and application to multiple newsvendors problem

Author

Listed:
  • David Ryz'ak
  • Martin v{C}ern'y

Abstract

This paper studies the stochastic setting in cooperative games and suggests a solution concept based on second order stochastic dominance (SSD), which is often applied to robustly model risk averse behaviour of players in different economic and game theoretic models as it enables to model not specified levels of risk aversion among players. The main result of the paper connects this solution concept, \emph{SSD-core}, in case of uniform distribution of the game to cores of two deterministic cooperative games. Interestingly, balancedness of both of these games and convexity of one of these implies non-emptiness of the SSD-core. The opposite implication does not, in general, hold and leads to questions about intersections of cores of two games and their relations. Finally, we present an application of the SSD-core to the multiple newsvendors problem, where we provide a characterization of risk averse behaviour of players with an interpretation in terms of the model.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ryz'ak & Martin v{C}ern'y, 2024. "Stochastic cooperative games of risk averse players and application to multiple newsvendors problem," Papers 2410.19002, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2410.19002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.19002
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thierry Post, 2003. "Empirical Tests for Stochastic Dominance Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(5), pages 1905-1931, October.
    2. Suijs, Jeroen & Borm, Peter & De Waegenaere, Anja & Tijs, Stef, 1999. "Cooperative games with stochastic payoffs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 193-205, February.
    3. Hadar, Josef & Russell, William R, 1969. "Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(1), pages 25-34, March.
    4. repec:bla:jfinan:v:58:y:2003:i:5:p:1905-1932 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Haim Levy, 1992. "Stochastic Dominance and Expected Utility: Survey and Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 555-593, April.
    6. Chaolin Yang & Zhenyu Hu & Sean X. Zhou, 2021. "Multilocation Newsvendor Problem: Centralization and Inventory Pooling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 185-200, January.
    7. M Dror & B C Hartman, 2011. "Survey of cooperative inventory games and extensions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 565-580, April.
    8. Hartman, Bruce C. & Dror, Moshe & Shaked, Moshe, 2000. "Cores of Inventory Centralization Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 26-49, April.
    9. F. R. Fernández & J. Puerto & M. J. Zafra, 2002. "Cores Of Stochastic Cooperative Games With Stochastic Orders," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 265-280.
    10. Özen, Ulas & Norde, Henk & Slikker, Marco, 2011. "On the convexity of newsvendor games," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 35-42, September.
    11. Rothschild, Michael & Stiglitz, Joseph E., 1970. "Increasing risk: I. A definition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 225-243, September.
    12. Panfei Sun & Dongshuang Hou & Hao Sun, 2022. "Optimization implementation of solution concepts for cooperative games with stochastic payoffs," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 691-724, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:wvu:wpaper:10-08 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Guo, Dongmei & Hu, Yi & Wang, Shouyang & Zhao, Lin, 2016. "Comparing risks with reference points: A stochastic dominance approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 105-116.
    3. Haim Shalit & Shlomo Yitzhaki, 2010. "How does beta explain stochastic dominance efficiency?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 431-444, November.
    4. Francesco Cesarone & Raffaello Cesetti & Giuseppe Orlando & Manuel Luis Martino & Jacopo Maria Ricci, 2022. "Comparing SSD-Efficient Portfolios with a Skewed Reference Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Arvanitis, Stelios & Scaillet, Olivier & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2020. "Spanning tests for Markowitz stochastic dominance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 291-311.
    6. Al-Khazali, Osamah & Lean, Hooi Hooi & Samet, Anis, 2014. "Do Islamic stock indexes outperform conventional stock indexes? A stochastic dominance approach," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 29-46.
    7. Daskalaki, Charoula & Skiadopoulos, George & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2017. "Diversification benefits of commodities: A stochastic dominance efficiency approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 250-269.
    8. Andrey Lizyayev, 2012. "Stochastic dominance efficiency analysis of diversified portfolios: classification, comparison and refinements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 391-410, July.
    9. Christodoulakis, George & Mohamed, Abdulkadir & Topaloglou, Nikolas, 2018. "Optimal privatization portfolios in the presence of arbitrary risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1172-1191.
    10. Lizyayev, Andrey & Ruszczyński, Andrzej, 2012. "Tractable Almost Stochastic Dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 448-455.
    11. Cristiano Arbex Valle & John E Beasley & Nigel Meade, 2024. "Subset second-order stochastic dominance for enhanced indexation with diversification enforced by sector constraints," Papers 2404.16777, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    12. Thomas Kourouxous & Thomas Bauer, 2019. "Violations of dominance in decision-making," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 209-239, April.
    13. Nowak, Maciej, 2004. "Preference and veto thresholds in multicriteria analysis based on stochastic dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 339-350, October.
    14. Courage Ose Eburajolo & Sunday Oseiweh Ogbeide, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Stochastic Dominance and Portfolio Selection in the Stock Market: Evidence from Nigeria," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 4, pages 412-428.
    15. Al-Khazali, Osamah, 2014. "Revisiting fast profit investor sentiment and stock returns during Ramadan," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 158-170.
    16. Yudhvir Seetharam, 2013. "Do Mutual Funds Attract the Right Investor? A Stochastic Dominance Approach," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(12), pages 905-914.
    17. Sheng-Ping Yang & Thanh Nguyen, 2019. "Skewness Preference and Asset Pricing: Evidence from the Japanese Stock Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-10, September.
    18. Xuan Vinh Doan & Tri-Dung Nguyen, 2019. "Technical Note—Robust Newsvendor Games with Ambiguity in Demand Distributions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 1047-1062, July.
    19. Moti Michaeli, 2021. "On Measuring Welfare ‘Behind a Veil of Ignorance’," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(1), pages 57-66, January.
    20. Lean, Hooi Hooi & McAleer, Michael & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2010. "Market efficiency of oil spot and futures: A mean-variance and stochastic dominance approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 979-986, September.
    21. Hooi Hooi Lean & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2010. "Market Efficiency of Oil Spot and Futures: A Stochastic Dominance Approach," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-705, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2410.19002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.