IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2311.15548.html

Deficiency of Large Language Models in Finance: An Empirical Examination of Hallucination

Author

Listed:
  • Haoqiang Kang
  • Xiao-Yang Liu

Abstract

The hallucination issue is recognized as a fundamental deficiency of large language models (LLMs), especially when applied to fields such as finance, education, and law. Despite the growing concerns, there has been a lack of empirical investigation. In this paper, we provide an empirical examination of LLMs' hallucination behaviors in financial tasks. First, we empirically investigate LLM model's ability of explaining financial concepts and terminologies. Second, we assess LLM models' capacity of querying historical stock prices. Third, to alleviate the hallucination issue, we evaluate the efficacy of four practical methods, including few-shot learning, Decoding by Contrasting Layers (DoLa), the Retrieval Augmentation Generation (RAG) method and the prompt-based tool learning method for a function to generate a query command. Finally, our major finding is that off-the-shelf LLMs experience serious hallucination behaviors in financial tasks. Therefore, there is an urgent need to call for research efforts in mitigating LLMs' hallucination.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoqiang Kang & Xiao-Yang Liu, 2023. "Deficiency of Large Language Models in Finance: An Empirical Examination of Hallucination," Papers 2311.15548, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.15548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.15548
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shijie Wu & Ozan Irsoy & Steven Lu & Vadim Dabravolski & Mark Dredze & Sebastian Gehrmann & Prabhanjan Kambadur & David Rosenberg & Gideon Mann, 2023. "BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance," Papers 2303.17564, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tianyi Zhang & Mu Chen, 2025. "Personalized Chain-of-Thought Summarization of Financial News for Investor Decision Support," Papers 2511.05508, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed-Khalil Ghali & Cecil Pang & Oscar Molina & Carlos Gershenson-Garcia & Daehan Won, 2025. "Forecasting Commodity Price Shocks Using Temporal and Semantic Fusion of Prices Signals and Agentic Generative AI Extracted Economic News," Papers 2508.06497, arXiv.org.
    2. Ching-Nam Hang & Pei-Duo Yu & Roberto Morabito & Chee-Wei Tan, 2024. "Large Language Models Meet Next-Generation Networking Technologies: A Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, October.
    3. Xia Li & Hanghang Zheng & Xiao Chen & Hong Liu & Mao Mao, 2025. "Class-Imbalanced-Aware Adaptive Dataset Distillation for Scalable Pretrained Model on Credit Scoring," Papers 2501.10677, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    4. Lezhi Li & Ting-Yu Chang & Hai Wang, 2023. "Multimodal Gen-AI for Fundamental Investment Research," Papers 2401.06164, arXiv.org.
    5. Thanos Konstantinidis & Giorgos Iacovides & Mingxue Xu & Tony G. Constantinides & Danilo Mandic, 2024. "FinLlama: Financial Sentiment Classification for Algorithmic Trading Applications," Papers 2403.12285, arXiv.org.
    6. Yijia Xiao & Edward Sun & Tong Chen & Fang Wu & Di Luo & Wei Wang, 2025. "Trading-R1: Financial Trading with LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2509.11420, arXiv.org.
    7. Meyer, Julian Anton, 2025. "Success factors and development areas for the implementation of Generative AI in companies," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(1), pages 1-23.
    8. Frank Xing, 2024. "Designing Heterogeneous LLM Agents for Financial Sentiment Analysis," Papers 2401.05799, arXiv.org.
    9. Ankur Sinha & Chaitanya Agarwal & Pekka Malo, 2025. "FinBloom: Knowledge Grounding Large Language Model with Real-time Financial Data," Papers 2502.18471, arXiv.org.
    10. Hoyoung Lee & Youngsoo Choi & Yuhee Kwon, 2024. "Quantifying Qualitative Insights: Leveraging LLMs to Market Predict," Papers 2411.08404, arXiv.org.
    11. Seppälä, Timo & Mucha, Tomasz & Mattila, Juri, 2023. "Beyond AI, Blockchain Systems, and Digital Platforms: Digitalization Unlocks Mass Hyper-Personalization and Mass Servitization," ETLA Working Papers 106, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    12. Artur Kulpa & Grzegorz Wojarnik, 2025. "Prompt Engineering in Finance: An LLM-Based Multi-Agent Architecture for Decision Support," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1201-1217.
    13. Zhaofeng Zhang & Banghao Chen & Shengxin Zhu & Nicolas Langren'e, 2024. "Quantformer: from attention to profit with a quantitative transformer trading strategy," Papers 2404.00424, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    14. Shengkun Wang & Taoran Ji & Linhan Wang & Yanshen Sun & Shang-Ching Liu & Amit Kumar & Chang-Tien Lu, 2024. "StockTime: A Time Series Specialized Large Language Model Architecture for Stock Price Prediction," Papers 2409.08281, arXiv.org.
    15. Zhang, Liang & Chen, Zhelun, 2025. "Opportunities of applying Large Language Models in building energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    16. Wu, Zongxiao & Dong, Yizhe & Li, Yaoyiran & Shi, Baofeng, 2025. "Unleashing the power of text for credit default prediction: Comparing human-written and generative AI-refined texts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 326(3), pages 691-706.
    17. Sharique Hasan & Alexander Oettl & Sampsa Samila, 2025. "From Model Design to Organizational Design: Complexity Redistribution and Trade-Offs in Generative AI," Papers 2506.22440, arXiv.org.
    18. Zhongtian Sun & Chenghao Xiao & Anoushka Harit & Jongmin Yu, 2025. "Quantifying Semantic Shift in Financial NLP: Robust Metrics for Market Prediction Stability," Papers 2510.00205, arXiv.org.
    19. Issa Sugiura & Takashi Ishida & Taro Makino & Chieko Tazuke & Takanori Nakagawa & Kosuke Nakago & David Ha, 2025. "EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial Statements," Papers 2506.08762, arXiv.org.
    20. Crijman Alexandru-Mihai & Maldareanu Andreea & Dumitru Valentin-Florentin, 2025. "The Evolution Of Large Language Models: From Chatgpt To Multi-Model Ai Agents And Their Impact On The Financial And Economic Sectors," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 323-334, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.15548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.