IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2211.17005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pathwise CVA Regressions With Oversimulated Defaults

Author

Listed:
  • Lokman Abbas-Turki
  • St'ephane Cr'epey
  • Bouazza Saadeddine

Abstract

We consider the computation by simulation and neural net regression of conditional expectations, or more general elicitable statistics, of functionals of processes $(X, Y )$. Here an exogenous component $Y$ (Markov by itself) is time-consuming to simulate, while the endogenous component $X$ (jointly Markov with $Y$) is quick to simulate given $Y$, but is responsible for most of the variance of the simulated payoff. To address the related variance issue, we introduce a conditionally independent, hierarchical simulation scheme, where several paths of $X$ are simulated for each simulated path of $Y$. We analyze the statistical convergence of the regression learning scheme based on such block-dependent data. We derive heuristics on the number of paths of $Y$ and, for each of them, of $X$, that should be simulated. The resulting algorithm is implemented on a graphics processing unit (GPU) combining Python/CUDA and learning with PyTorch. A CVA case study with a nested Monte Carlo benchmark shows that the hierarchical simulation technique is key to the success of the learning approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Lokman Abbas-Turki & St'ephane Cr'epey & Bouazza Saadeddine, 2022. "Pathwise CVA Regressions With Oversimulated Defaults," Papers 2211.17005, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2211.17005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.17005
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    2. Crépey, Stéphane & Song, Shiqi, 2015. "BSDEs of counterparty risk," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 125(8), pages 3023-3052.
    3. Brian Huge & Antoine Savine, 2020. "Differential Machine Learning," Papers 2005.02347, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    4. Alessandro Gnoatto & Athena Picarelli & Christoph Reisinger, 2020. "Deep xVA solver - A neural network based counterparty credit risk management framework," Working Papers 07/2020, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    5. René Carmona & Stéphane Crépey, 2010. "Particle Methods For The Estimation Of Credit Portfolio Loss Distributions," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 577-602.
    6. Claudio Albanese & Stéphane Crépey & Rodney Hoskinson & Bouazza Saadeddine, 2021. "XVA analysis from the balance sheet," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 99-123, January.
    7. Lokman A. Abbas-Turki & Stéphane Crépey & Babacar Diallo, 2018. "Xva Principles, Nested Monte Carlo Strategies, And Gpu Optimizations," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06), pages 1-40, September.
    8. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Xiao, 2023. "Default Process Modeling and Credit Valuation Adjustment," Papers 2309.03311, arXiv.org.
    2. Lee, David, 2023. "Default Forecasting and Credit Valuation Adjustment," MPRA Paper 118578, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Irena Barjav{s}i'c & Stefano Battiston & Vinko Zlati'c, 2023. "Credit Valuation Adjustment in Financial Networks," Papers 2305.16434, arXiv.org.
    4. Dorinel Bastide & Stéphane Crépey & Samuel Drapeau & Mekonnen Tadese, 2022. "Derivatives Risks as Costs in a One-Period Network Model," Post-Print hal-03910144, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lokman A. Abbas‐Turki & Stéphane Crépey & Bouazza Saadeddine, 2023. "Pathwise CVA regressions with oversimulated defaults," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 274-307, April.
    2. Lokman A Abbas-Turki & Stéphane Crépey & Bouazza Saadeddine, 2023. "Pathwise CVA Regressions With Oversimulated Defaults," Post-Print hal-03910149, HAL.
    3. Giorgia Callegaro & Alessandro Gnoatto & Martino Grasselli, 2021. "A Fully Quantization-based Scheme for FBSDEs," Working Papers 07/2021, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    4. Alessandro Gnoatto & Athena Picarelli & Christoph Reisinger, 2020. "Deep xVA solver -- A neural network based counterparty credit risk management framework," Papers 2005.02633, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    5. Callegaro, Giorgia & Gnoatto, Alessandro & Grasselli, Martino, 2023. "A fully quantization-based scheme for FBSDEs," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    6. Claudio Albanese & Stéphane Crépey & Rodney Hoskinson & Bouazza Saadeddine, 2021. "XVA analysis from the balance sheet," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 99-123, January.
    7. Lokman Abbas-Turki & St'ephane Cr'epey & Botao Li & Bouazza Saadeddine, 2024. "An Explicit Scheme for Pathwise XVA Computations," Papers 2401.13314, arXiv.org.
    8. Magnus Grønnegaard Frandsen & Tobias Cramer Pedersen & Rolf Poulsen, 2022. "Delta force: option pricing with differential machine learning," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Griselda Deelstra & Lech A. Grzelak & Felix L. Wolf, 2022. "Accelerated Computations of Sensitivities for xVA," Papers 2211.17026, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    10. Stéphane Crépey & Matthew F Dixon, 2020. "Gaussian process regression for derivative portfolio modeling and application to credit valuation adjustment computations," Post-Print hal-03910109, HAL.
    11. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    12. Work, James & Hauer, Grant & Luckert, M.K. (Marty), 2018. "What ethanol prices would induce growers to switch from agriculture to poplar in Alberta? A multiple options approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 51-62.
    13. Kathrin Glau & Ricardo Pachon & Christian Potz, 2019. "Speed-up credit exposure calculations for pricing and risk management," Papers 1912.01280, arXiv.org.
    14. Dong, Wenfeng & Kang, Boda, 2019. "Analysis of a multiple year gas sales agreement with make-up, carry-forward and indexation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 76-96.
    15. Pringles, Rolando & Olsina, Fernando & Penizzotto, Franco, 2020. "Valuation of defer and relocation options in photovoltaic generation investments by a stochastic simulation-based method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 846-864.
    16. Marta Biancardi & Giovanni Villani, 2017. "Robust Monte Carlo Method for R&D Real Options Valuation," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 481-498, March.
    17. Gabriel J Power & Charli D. Tandja M. & Josée Bastien & Philippe Grégoire, 2015. "Measuring infrastructure investment option value," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 16(1), pages 49-72, January.
    18. Stentoft, Lars, 2005. "Pricing American options when the underlying asset follows GARCH processes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 576-611, September.
    19. O. Samimi & Z. Mardani & S. Sharafpour & F. Mehrdoust, 2017. "LSM Algorithm for Pricing American Option Under Heston–Hull–White’s Stochastic Volatility Model," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 50(2), pages 173-187, August.
    20. Mo, Jian-Lei & Schleich, Joachim & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2015. "Delaying the introduction of emissions trading systems—Implications for power plant investment and operation from a multi-stage decision model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PB), pages 255-264.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2211.17005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.