IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2205.12043.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Static Replication of Impermanent Loss for Concentrated Liquidity Provision in Decentralised Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Deng
  • Hua Zong
  • Yun Wang

Abstract

This article analytically characterizes the impermanent loss of concentrated liquidity provision for automatic market makers in decentralised markets such as Uniswap. We propose two static replication formulas for the impermanent loss by a combination of European calls or puts with strike prices supported on the liquidity provision price interval. It facilitates liquidity providers to hedge permanent loss by trading crypto options in more liquid centralised exchanges such as Deribit. Numerical examples illustrate the astonishing accuracy of the static replication.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Deng & Hua Zong & Yun Wang, 2022. "Static Replication of Impermanent Loss for Concentrated Liquidity Provision in Decentralised Markets," Papers 2205.12043, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2205.12043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.12043
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amihud, Yakov & Mendelson, Haim, 1980. "Dealership market : Market-making with inventory," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 31-53, March.
    2. O'Hara, Maureen & Oldfield, George S., 1986. "The Microeconomics of Market Making," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 361-376, December.
    3. Semyon Malamud & Marzena Rostek, 2017. "Decentralized Exchange," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(11), pages 3320-3362, November.
    4. Robert A Korajczyk & Dermot Murphy, 2019. "High-Frequency Market Making to Large Institutional Trades," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(3), pages 1034-1067.
    5. Agostino Capponi & Ruizhe Jia, 2021. "The Adoption of Blockchain-based Decentralized Exchanges," Papers 2103.08842, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    6. Andreas A. Aigner & Gurvinder Dhaliwal, 2021. "UNISWAP: Impermanent Loss and Risk Profile of a Liquidity Provider," Papers 2106.14404, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maxim Bichuch & Zachary Feinstein, 2022. "Axioms for Automated Market Makers: A Mathematical Framework in FinTech and Decentralized Finance," Papers 2210.01227, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Bergault & Louis Bertucci & David Bouba & Olivier Gu'eant, 2022. "Automated Market Makers: Mean-Variance Analysis of LPs Payoffs and Design of Pricing Functions," Papers 2212.00336, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    2. Richard K. Lyons, 1996. "Foreign Exchange Volume: Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing?," NBER Chapters, in: The Microstructure of Foreign Exchange Markets, pages 183-208, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Jihun Kim & Kwangwoo Park, 2021. "Improving liquidity in emission trading schemes," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(9), pages 1397-1411, September.
    4. Goldstein, Michael A. & Namin, Elmira Shekari, 2023. "Corporate bond liquidity and yield spreads: A review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. Lyons, Richard K., 1995. "Tests of microstructural hypotheses in the foreign exchange market," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2-3), pages 321-351.
    6. Havran, Dániel & Erb, Tamás, 2015. "Mit veszítünk a piaci súrlódásokkal?. A pénzügyi piacok mikrostruktúrája [Trading mechanisms and market frictions. Microstructure of the financial markets]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 229-262.
    7. Alexander Barzykin & Philippe Bergault & Olivier Guéant, 2023. "Algorithmic market making in dealer markets with hedging and market impact," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 41-79, January.
    8. Adrian, Tobias & Capponi, Agostino & Fleming, Michael & Vogt, Erik & Zhang, Hongzhong, 2020. "Intraday market making with overnight inventory costs," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Agostino Capponi & Jos'e E. Figueroa-L'opez & Chuyi Yu, 2021. "Market Making with Stochastic Liquidity Demand: Simultaneous Order Arrival and Price Change Forecasts," Papers 2101.03086, arXiv.org.
    10. Chakrabarty, Bidisha & Moulton, Pamela C., 2012. "Earnings announcements and attention constraints: The role of market design," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 612-634.
    11. Rösch, Dominik, 2021. "The impact of arbitrage on market liquidity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 195-213.
    12. Murphy Jun Jie Lee, 2013. "The Microstructure of Trading Processes on the Singapore Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 2-2013.
    13. Buis, Boyd & Pieterse-Bloem, Mary & Verschoor, Willem F.C. & Zwinkels, Remco C.J., 2020. "Expected issuance fees and market liquidity," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    14. Sigridur Benediktsdottir, 2006. "An empirical analysis of specialist trading behavior at the New York Stock Exchange," International Finance Discussion Papers 876, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    15. Wang, Xinjie & Zhong, Zhaodong (Ken), 2022. "Dealer inventory, pricing, and liquidity in the OTC derivatives markets: Evidence from index CDSs," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    16. Masaaki Fukasawa, 2014. "Efficient price dynamics in a limit order market: an utility indifference approach," Papers 1410.8224, arXiv.org.
    17. Pu Shen & Ross M. Starr, 2000. "Market makers' supply and pricing of financial market liquidity," Research Working Paper RWP 00-03, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    18. Ron Kaniel & Hong Liu, "undated". "Are Transactions and Market Orders More Important than Limit Orders in the Quote Updating Process?," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 16-98, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    19. Chang, Ya-Ting & Gau, Yin-Feng & Hsu, Chih-Chiang, 2017. "Liquidity Commonality in Foreign Exchange Markets During the Global Financial Crisis and the Sovereign Debt Crisis: Effects of Macroeconomic and Quantitative Easing Announcements," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 172-192.
    20. Abhinava Tripathi & Vipul & Alok Dixit, 0. "Liquidity commonality beyond best prices: Indian evidence," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-19.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2205.12043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.