IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2103.15544.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When to end a lock down? How fast must vaccination campaigns proceed in order to keep health costs in check?

Author

Listed:
  • Claudius Gros
  • Thomas Czypionka
  • Daniel Gros

Abstract

We propose a simple rule of thumb for countries which have embarked on a vaccination campaign while still facing the need to keep non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) in place because of the ongoing spread of SARS-CoV-2. If the aim is to keep the death rate from increasing, NPIs can be loosened when it is possible to vaccinate more than twice the growth rate of new cases. If the aim is to keep the pressure on hospitals under control, the vaccination rate has to be about four times higher. These simple rules can be derived from the observation that the risk of death or a severe course requiring hospitalization from a COVID-19 infection increases exponentially with age and that the sizes of age cohorts decrease linearly at the top of the population pyramid. Protecting the over 60-year-olds, which constitute approximately one-quarter of the population in Europe (and most OECD countries), reduces the potential loss of life by 95 percent.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudius Gros & Thomas Czypionka & Daniel Gros, 2021. "When to end a lock down? How fast must vaccination campaigns proceed in order to keep health costs in check?," Papers 2103.15544, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2103.15544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.15544
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudius Gros & Daniel Gros, 2021. "Incentives for accelerating the production of Covid-19 vaccines in the presence of adjustment costs," Papers 2102.09807, arXiv.org.
    2. Andrew T. Levin & William P. Hanage & Nana Owusu-Boaitey & Kensington B. Cochran & Seamus P. Walsh & Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, 2020. "Assessing the Age Specificity of Infection Fatality Rates for COVID-19: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, & Public Policy Implications," NBER Working Papers 27597, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Claudius Gros & Roser Valenti & Lukas Schneider & Kilian Valenti & Daniel Gros, 2020. "Containment efficiency and control strategies for the Corona pandemic costs," Papers 2004.00493, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudius Gros & Daniel Gros, 2021. "How Fast Must Vaccination Campaigns Proceed in Order to Beat Rising Covid-19 Infection Numbers?," EconPol Policy Brief 34, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    2. Fattahi, Mohammad & Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil & Kannan, Devika & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Resource planning strategies for healthcare systems during a pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 192-206.
    3. Di Bartolomeo, Giovanni & D'Imperio, Paolo & Felici, Francesco, 2022. "The fiscal response to the Italian COVID-19 crisis: A counterfactual analysis," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Anna Scherbina, 2021. "Assessing the Optimality of a COVID Lockdown in the United States," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 177-201, July.
    5. Antonio Diez de los Rios, 2022. "A macroeconomic model of an epidemic with silent transmission and endogenous self‐isolation," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(S1), pages 581-625, February.
    6. Saskia Morwinsky & Natalie Nitsche & Enrique Acosta, 2021. "COVID-19 fatality in Germany: Demographic determinants of variation in case-fatality rates across and within German federal states during the first and second waves," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(45), pages 1355-1372.
    7. Miguel Casares & Paul Gomme & Hashmat Khan, 2022. "COVID‐19 pandemic and economic scenarios for Ontario," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(S1), pages 503-539, February.
    8. Lin Ma & Gil Shapira & Damien de Walque & Quy‐Toan Do & Jed Friedman & Andrei A. Levchenko, 2022. "The Intergenerational Mortality Trade‐Off Of Covid‐19 Lockdown Policies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1427-1468, August.
    9. Michalski Tomasz & Stępień Joanna, 2021. "Ageing in European post-communist countries – is it a threat to the welfare system?," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 63-71, June.
    10. Tanmay Devi & Kaushik Gopalan, 2022. "A Statistical Model of COVID-19 Infection Incidence in the Southern Indian State of Tamil Nadu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-10, September.
    11. Egor Malkov, 2021. "Spousal Occupational Sorting and COVID-19 Incidence: Evidence from the United States," Papers 2107.14350, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    12. Hilde C. Bjørnland & Malin C. Jensen & Leif Anders Thorsrud, 2023. "Business Cycle and Health Dynamics during the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Scandinavian Perspective," Working Papers No 15/2023, Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School.
    13. Jan Krzysztof Solarz & Krzysztof Waliszewski, 2020. "Holistic Framework for COVID-19 Pandemic as Systemic Risk," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 340-351.
    14. Ferdinand von Siemens, 2021. "Motivated Beliefs and the Elderly's Compliance With Covid-19 Measures," CESifo Working Paper Series 8832, CESifo.
    15. Andrew Perrault & Marie Charpignon & Jonathan Gruber & Milind Tambe & Maimuna Majumder, 2020. "Designing Efficient Contact Tracing Through Risk-Based Quarantining," NBER Working Papers 28135, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Quang Dang Nguyen & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2022. "A general framework for optimising cost-effectiveness of pandemic response under partial intervention measures," Papers 2205.08996, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    17. Christina Bohk-Ewald & Enrique Acosta & Timothy Riffe & Christian Dudel & Mikko Myrskylä, 2021. "Magnitude, global variation, and temporal development of the COVID-19 infection fatality burden," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2021-024, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    18. Kordonis, Ioannis & Lagos, Athanasios-Rafail & Papavassilopoulos, George P., 2022. "Nash social distancing games with equity constraints: How inequality aversion affects the spread of epidemics," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    19. Fulvio Lauretani & Marco Salvi & Irene Zucchini & Crescenzo Testa & Chiara Cattabiani & Arianna Arisi & Marcello Maggio, 2023. "Relationship between Vitamin D and Immunity in Older People with COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Mouré, Christopher, 2022. "Costly Efficiencies: Health Care Spending, COVID-19, and the Public/Private Health Care Debate," Review of Capital as Power, Capital As Power - Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism, vol. 2(2), pages 17-45.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2103.15544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.