IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2006.14510.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quantum Computing for Finance: State of the Art and Future Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel J. Egger
  • Claudio Gambella
  • Jakub Marecek
  • Scott McFaddin
  • Martin Mevissen
  • Rudy Raymond
  • Andrea Simonetto
  • Stefan Woerner
  • Elena Yndurain

Abstract

This article outlines our point of view regarding the applicability, state-of-the-art, and potential of quantum computing for problems in finance. We provide an introduction to quantum computing as well as a survey on problem classes in finance that are computationally challenging classically and for which quantum computing algorithms are promising. In the main part, we describe in detail quantum algorithms for specific applications arising in financial services, such as those involving simulation, optimization, and machine learning problems. In addition, we include demonstrations of quantum algorithms on IBM Quantum back-ends and discuss the potential benefits of quantum algorithms for problems in financial services. We conclude with a summary of technical challenges and future prospects.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel J. Egger & Claudio Gambella & Jakub Marecek & Scott McFaddin & Martin Mevissen & Rudy Raymond & Andrea Simonetto & Stefan Woerner & Elena Yndurain, 2020. "Quantum Computing for Finance: State of the Art and Future Prospects," Papers 2006.14510, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2006.14510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.14510
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Schuld, 2019. "Machine learning in quantum spaces," Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7747), pages 179-181, March.
    2. Alberto Peruzzo & Jarrod McClean & Peter Shadbolt & Man-Hong Yung & Xiao-Qi Zhou & Peter J. Love & Alán Aspuru-Guzik & Jeremy L. O’Brien, 2014. "A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, September.
    3. Paul Glasserman & Jingyi Li, 2005. "Importance Sampling for Portfolio Credit Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(11), pages 1643-1656, November.
    4. Jacob Biamonte & Peter Wittek & Nicola Pancotti & Patrick Rebentrost & Nathan Wiebe & Seth Lloyd, 2017. "Quantum machine learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 549(7671), pages 195-202, September.
    5. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    6. Vojtěch Havlíček & Antonio D. Córcoles & Kristan Temme & Aram W. Harrow & Abhinav Kandala & Jerry M. Chow & Jay M. Gambetta, 2019. "Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces," Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7747), pages 209-212, March.
    7. Lessmann, Stefan & Baesens, Bart & Seow, Hsin-Vonn & Thomas, Lyn C., 2015. "Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 124-136.
    8. Corwin Joy & Phelim P. Boyle & Ken Seng Tan, 1996. "Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Numerical Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 926-938, June.
    9. Boyle, Phelim P., 1977. "Options: A Monte Carlo approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 323-338, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isaiah Hull & Or Sattath & Eleni Diamanti & Göran Wendin, 2024. "Quantum Technology for Economists," Contributions to Economics, Springer, number 978-3-031-50780-9.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajagekar, Akshay & You, Fengqi, 2022. "Quantum computing and quantum artificial intelligence for renewable and sustainable energy: A emerging prospect towards climate neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Valeriy Ryabchenko & Sergey Sarykalin & Stan Uryasev, 2004. "Pricing European Options by Numerical Replication: Quadratic Programming with Constraints," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 11(3), pages 301-333, September.
    3. Nelson Areal & Artur Rodrigues & Manuel Armada, 2008. "On improving the least squares Monte Carlo option valuation method," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 119-151, March.
    4. Ömür Ugur, 2008. "An Introduction to Computational Finance," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number p556, February.
    5. Sofiene Jerbi & Lukas J. Fiderer & Hendrik Poulsen Nautrup & Jonas M. Kübler & Hans J. Briegel & Vedran Dunjko, 2023. "Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methods," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Dylan Herman & Cody Googin & Xiaoyuan Liu & Alexey Galda & Ilya Safro & Yue Sun & Marco Pistoia & Yuri Alexeev, 2022. "A Survey of Quantum Computing for Finance," Papers 2201.02773, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    7. Wang, Chuan-Ju & Kao, Ming-Yang, 2016. "Optimal search for parameters in Monte Carlo simulation for derivative pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 683-690.
    8. Olawale Ayoade & Pablo Rivas & Javier Orduz, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence Computing at the Quantum Level," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Wei-Ming Li & Shi-Ju Ran, 2022. "Non-Parametric Semi-Supervised Learning in Many-Body Hilbert Space with Rescaled Logarithmic Fidelity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Aprahamian, Hrayer & Maddah, Bacel, 2015. "Pricing Asian options via compound gamma and orthogonal polynomials," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 264(C), pages 21-43.
    11. Lingling Xu & Hongjie Zhang & Fu Lee Wang, 2023. "Pricing of Arithmetic Average Asian Option by Combining Variance Reduction and Quasi-Monte Carlo Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Pringles, Rolando & Olsina, Fernando & Penizzotto, Franco, 2020. "Valuation of defer and relocation options in photovoltaic generation investments by a stochastic simulation-based method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 846-864.
    13. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    14. Stentoft, Lars, 2005. "Pricing American options when the underlying asset follows GARCH processes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 576-611, September.
    15. Grosen, Anders & Lochte Jorgensen, Peter, 2000. "Fair valuation of life insurance liabilities: The impact of interest rate guarantees, surrender options, and bonus policies," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 37-57, February.
    16. Yongxin Yang & Yu Zheng & Timothy M. Hospedales, 2016. "Gated Neural Networks for Option Pricing: Rationality by Design," Papers 1609.07472, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    17. Galai, Dan & Raviv, Alon & Wiener, Zvi, 2007. "Liquidation triggers and the valuation of equity and debt," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 3604-3620, December.
    18. Boris Ter-Avanesov & Homayoon Beigi, 2024. "MLP, XGBoost, KAN, TDNN, and LSTM-GRU Hybrid RNN with Attention for SPX and NDX European Call Option Pricing," Papers 2409.06724, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    19. Kostrova, Alisa & Britz, Wolfgang & Djanibekov, Utkur & Finger, Robert, 2016. "Monte-Carlo Simulation and Stochastic Programming in Real Options Valuation: the Case of Perennial Energy Crop Cultivation," Discussion Papers 250253, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    20. Xinbiao Wang & Yuxuan Du & Zhuozhuo Tu & Yong Luo & Xiao Yuan & Dacheng Tao, 2024. "Transition role of entangled data in quantum machine learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2006.14510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.