IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1502.06681.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Arbitrage, hedging and utility maximization using semi-static trading strategies with American options

Author

Listed:
  • Erhan Bayraktar
  • Zhou Zhou

Abstract

We consider a financial market where stocks are available for dynamic trading, and European and American options are available for static trading (semi-static trading strategies). We assume that the American options are infinitely divisible, and can only be bought but not sold. In the first part of the paper, we work within the framework without model ambiguity. We first get the fundamental theorem of asset pricing (FTAP). Using the FTAP, we get the dualities for the hedging prices of European and American options. Based on the hedging dualities, we also get the duality for the utility maximization. In the second part of the paper, we consider the market which admits non-dominated model uncertainty. We first establish the hedging result, and then using the hedging duality we further get the FTAP. Due to the technical difficulty stemming from the non-dominancy of the probability measure set, we use a discretization technique and apply the minimax theorem.

Suggested Citation

  • Erhan Bayraktar & Zhou Zhou, 2015. "Arbitrage, hedging and utility maximization using semi-static trading strategies with American options," Papers 1502.06681, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2016.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1502.06681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.06681
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander M. G. Cox & Christoph Hoeggerl, 2013. "Model-independent no-arbitrage conditions on American put options," Papers 1301.5467, arXiv.org.
    2. W. Schachermayer, 1994. "Martingale Measures For Discrete‐Time Processes With Infinite Horizon," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 25-55, January.
    3. Pietro Siorpaes, 2015. "Optimal investment and price dependence in a semi-static market," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 161-187, January.
    4. Erhan Bayraktar & Yu-Jui Huang & Zhou Zhou, 2013. "On hedging American options under model uncertainty," Papers 1309.2982, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2015.
    5. Mathias Beiglbock & Pierre Henry-Labord`ere & Friedrich Penkner, 2011. "Model-independent Bounds for Option Prices: A Mass Transport Approach," Papers 1106.5929, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2013.
    6. Mark H. A. Davis & David G. Hobson, 2007. "The Range Of Traded Option Prices," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5710 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mathias Beiglböck & Pierre Henry-Labordère & Friedrich Penkner, 2013. "Model-independent bounds for option prices—a mass transport approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 477-501, July.
    9. Beatrice Acciaio & Mathias Beiglbock & Friedrich Penkner & Walter Schachermayer, 2013. "A model-free version of the fundamental theorem of asset pricing and the super-replication theorem," Papers 1301.5568, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2013.
    10. Walter Schachermayer, 2013. "The Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 2, pages 31-48, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Aksamit & Ivan Guo & Shidan Liu & Zhou Zhou, 2021. "Superhedging duality for multi-action options under model uncertainty with information delay," Papers 2111.14502, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    2. Erhan Bayraktar & Zhou Zhou, 2019. "No-Arbitrage and Hedging with Liquid American Options," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 468-486, May.
    3. Erhan Bayraktar & Jingjie Zhang & Zhou Zhou, 2018. "Time Consistent Stopping For The Mean-Standard Deviation Problem --- The Discrete Time Case," Papers 1802.08358, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
    4. Yan Dolinsky & Or Zuk, 2023. "Explicit Computations for Delayed Semistatic Hedging," Papers 2308.10550, arXiv.org.
    5. Tongseok Lim, 2023. "Optimal exercise decision of American options under model uncertainty," Papers 2310.14473, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    6. Erhan Bayraktar & Zhou Zhou, 2017. "Super-Hedging American Options With Semi-Static Trading Strategies Under Model Uncertainty," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(06), pages 1-10, September.
    7. Jiexin Dai & Abootaleb Shirvani & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2020. "Rational Finance Approach to Behavioral Option Pricing," Papers 2005.05310, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erhan Bayraktar & Yu-Jui Huang & Zhou Zhou, 2013. "On hedging American options under model uncertainty," Papers 1309.2982, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2015.
    2. Erhan Bayraktar & Zhou Zhou, 2019. "No-Arbitrage and Hedging with Liquid American Options," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 468-486, May.
    3. Cox, Alexander M.G. & Kinsley, Sam M., 2019. "Discretisation and duality of optimal Skorokhod embedding problems," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 129(7), pages 2376-2405.
    4. Beatrice Acciaio & Martin Larsson & Walter Schachermayer, 2016. "The space of outcomes of semi-static trading strategies need not be closed," Papers 1606.00631, arXiv.org.
    5. Romain Blanchard & Laurence Carassus, 2019. "No-arbitrage with multiple-priors in discrete time," Papers 1904.08780, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    6. Romain Blanchard & Laurence Carassus, 2021. "Convergence of utility indifference prices to the superreplication price in a multiple‐priors framework," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 366-398, January.
    7. Alexander M. G. Cox & Zhaoxu Hou & Jan Obloj, 2014. "Robust pricing and hedging under trading restrictions and the emergence of local martingale models," Papers 1406.0551, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    8. Mathias Beiglbock & Marcel Nutz, 2014. "Martingale Inequalities and Deterministic Counterparts," Papers 1401.4698, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2014.
    9. Sergey Badikov & Mark H. A. Davis & Antoine Jacquier, 2018. "Perturbation analysis of sub/super hedging problems," Papers 1806.03543, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    10. Sergey Badikov & Antoine Jacquier & Daphne Qing Liu & Patrick Roome, 2016. "No-arbitrage bounds for the forward smile given marginals," Papers 1603.06389, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2016.
    11. David Hobson & Anthony Neuberger, 2016. "On the value of being American," Papers 1604.02269, arXiv.org.
    12. Sergey Nadtochiy & Jan Obłój, 2017. "Robust Trading Of Implied Skew," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-41, March.
    13. David Hobson & Dominykas Norgilas, 2019. "Robust bounds for the American put," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 359-395, April.
    14. Mathias Beiglbock & Alexander M. G. Cox & Martin Huesmann & Nicolas Perkowski & David J. Promel, 2015. "Pathwise super-replication via Vovk's outer measure," Papers 1504.03644, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2016.
    15. Acciaio, Beatrice & Larsson, Martin, 2017. "Semi-static completeness and robust pricing by informed investors," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68502, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Anna Aksamit & Zhaoxu Hou & Jan Obl'oj, 2016. "Robust framework for quantifying the value of information in pricing and hedging," Papers 1605.02539, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    17. David Hobson & Martin Klimmek, 2015. "Robust price bounds for the forward starting straddle," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 189-214, January.
    18. Nicolas Perkowski & David J. Promel, 2013. "Pathwise stochastic integrals for model free finance," Papers 1311.6187, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2016.
    19. Anna Aksamit & Ivan Guo & Shidan Liu & Zhou Zhou, 2021. "Superhedging duality for multi-action options under model uncertainty with information delay," Papers 2111.14502, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    20. Arash Fahim & Yu-Jui Huang, 2014. "Model-independent Superhedging under Portfolio Constraints," Papers 1402.2599, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1502.06681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.