IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1406.7723.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Active extension portfolio optimization with non-convex risk measures using metaheuristics

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Hochreiter
  • Christoph Waldhauser

Abstract

We consider the optimization of active extension portfolios. For this purpose, the optimization problem is rewritten as a stochastic programming model and solved using a clever multi-start local search heuristic, which turns out to provide stable solutions. The heuristic solutions are compared to optimization results of convex optimization solvers where applicable. Furthermore, the approach is applied to solve problems with non-convex risk measures, most notably to minimize Value-at-Risk. Numerical results using data from both the Dow Jones Industrial Average as well as the DAX 30 are shown.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Hochreiter & Christoph Waldhauser, 2014. "Active extension portfolio optimization with non-convex risk measures using metaheuristics," Papers 1406.7723, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1406.7723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.7723
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, March.
    2. Hiroshi Konno & Hiroaki Yamazaki, 1991. "Mean-Absolute Deviation Portfolio Optimization Model and Its Applications to Tokyo Stock Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 519-531, May.
    3. Stein W. Wallace & Stein-Erik Fleten, 2002. "Stochastic programming in energy," GE, Growth, Math methods 0201001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 13 Nov 2003.
    4. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Branda, Martin, 2013. "Diversification-consistent data envelopment analysis with general deviation measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 626-635.
    2. Jing-Rung Yu & Wan-Jiun Paul Chiou & Jian-Hong Yang, 2017. "Diversification benefits of risk portfolio models: a case of Taiwan’s stock market," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 467-502, February.
    3. Adabi Firouzjaee , Bagher & Mehrara , Mohsen & Mohammadi , Shapour, 2014. "Optimal Portfolio Selection for Tehran Stock Exchange Using Conditional, Partitioned and Worst-case Value at Risk Measures," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 9(1), pages 1-30, October.
    4. Yu, Jing-Rung & Paul Chiou, Wan-Jiun & Hsin, Yi-Ting & Sheu, Her-Jiun, 2022. "Omega portfolio models with floating return threshold," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 743-758.
    5. Lang, Joachim & Madlener, Reinhard, 2010. "Portfolio Optimization for Power Plants: The Impact of Credit Risk Mitigation and Margining," FCN Working Papers 11/2010, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).
    6. Akhter Mohiuddin Rather & V. N. Sastry & Arun Agarwal, 2017. "Stock market prediction and Portfolio selection models: a survey," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(3), pages 558-579, September.
    7. Lagos, Guido & Espinoza, Daniel & Moreno, Eduardo & Vielma, Juan Pablo, 2015. "Restricted risk measures and robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 771-782.
    8. Amita Sharma & Sebastian Utz & Aparna Mehra, 2017. "Omega-CVaR portfolio optimization and its worst case analysis," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 505-539, March.
    9. Karthik Natarajan & Dessislava Pachamanova & Melvyn Sim, 2008. "Incorporating Asymmetric Distributional Information in Robust Value-at-Risk Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 573-585, March.
    10. Guo, Sini & Yu, Lean & Li, Xiang & Kar, Samarjit, 2016. "Fuzzy multi-period portfolio selection with different investment horizons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 1026-1035.
    11. Gotoh, Jun-ya & Takeda, Akiko, 2012. "Minimizing loss probability bounds for portfolio selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 371-380.
    12. González-Díaz, Julio & González-Rodríguez, Brais & Leal, Marina & Puerto, Justo, 2021. "Global optimization for bilevel portfolio design: Economic insights from the Dow Jones index," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Huang, Jinbo & Li, Yong & Yao, Haixiang, 2018. "Index tracking model, downside risk and non-parametric kernel estimation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 103-128.
    14. Mansini, Renata & Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2014. "Twenty years of linear programming based portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 518-535.
    15. Chen, Zhiping & Wang, Yi, 2008. "Two-sided coherent risk measures and their application in realistic portfolio optimization," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 2667-2673, December.
    16. Daniel Espinoza & Eduardo Moreno, 2014. "A primal-dual aggregation algorithm for minimizing conditional value-at-risk in linear programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 617-638, December.
    17. Ma, Yilin & Wang, Yudong & Wang, Weizhong & Zhang, Chong, 2023. "Portfolios with return and volatility prediction for the energy stock market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    18. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    19. Dominique Guégan & Wayne Tarrant, 2012. "On the necessity of five risk measures," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 533-552, November.
    20. Gupta, Pankaj & Mittal, Garima & Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar, 2013. "Expected value multiobjective portfolio rebalancing model with fuzzy parameters," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 190-203.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1406.7723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.