IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1405.5294.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Valuation of Barrier Options using Sequential Monte Carlo

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel V. Shevchenko
  • Pierre Del Moral

Abstract

Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods have successfully been used in many applications in engineering, statistics and physics. However, these are seldom used in financial option pricing literature and practice. This paper presents SMC method for pricing barrier options with continuous and discrete monitoring of the barrier condition. Under the SMC method, simulated asset values rejected due to barrier condition are re-sampled from asset samples that do not breach the barrier condition improving the efficiency of the option price estimator; while under the standard Monte Carlo many simulated asset paths can be rejected by the barrier condition making it harder to estimate option price accurately. We compare SMC with the standard Monte Carlo method and demonstrate that the extra effort to implement SMC when compared with the standard Monte Carlo is very little while improvement in price estimate can be significant. Both methods result in unbiased estimators for the price converging to the true value as $1/\sqrt{M}$, where $M$ is the number of simulations (asset paths). However, the variance of SMC estimator is smaller and does not grow with the number of time steps when compared to the standard Monte Carlo. In this paper we demonstrate that SMC can successfully be used for pricing barrier options. SMC can also be used for pricing other exotic options and also for cases with many underlying assets and additional stochastic factors such as stochastic volatility; we provide general formulas and references.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel V. Shevchenko & Pierre Del Moral, 2014. "Valuation of Barrier Options using Sequential Monte Carlo," Papers 1405.5294, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2015.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1405.5294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.5294
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert C. Merton, 2005. "Theory of rational option pricing," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Sudipto Bhattacharya & George M Constantinides (ed.), Theory Of Valuation, chapter 8, pages 229-288, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11523 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Hua He & William P. Keirstead & Joachim Rebholz, 1998. "Double Lookbacks," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), pages 201-228, July.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11498 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Naoto Kunitomo & Masayuki Ikeda, 1992. "Pricing Options With Curved Boundaries1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(4), pages 275-298, October.
    6. Mark Broadie & Paul Glasserman & Steven Kou, 1997. "A Continuity Correction for Discrete Barrier Options," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), pages 325-349, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prigent, Jean-Luc & Renault, Olivier & Scaillet, Olivier, 2004. "Option pricing with discrete rebalancing," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 133-161, January.
    2. Zvan, R. & Vetzal, K. R. & Forsyth, P. A., 2000. "PDE methods for pricing barrier options," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(11-12), pages 1563-1590, October.
    3. Rahman Farnoosh & Hamidreza Rezazadeh & Amirhossein Sobhani & M. Hossein Beheshti, 2016. "A Numerical Method for Discrete Single Barrier Option Pricing with Time-Dependent Parameters," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 48(1), pages 131-145, June.
    4. Jun, Doobae & Ku, Hyejin, 2015. "Static hedging of chained-type barrier options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 317-327.
    5. Xie, Fei & He, Zhijian & Wang, Xiaoqun, 2019. "An importance sampling-based smoothing approach for quasi-Monte Carlo simulation of discrete barrier options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 759-772.
    6. Kontosakos, Vasileios E. & Mendonca, Keegan & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Zuev, Konstantin M., 2021. "Pricing discretely-monitored double barrier options with small probabilities of execution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 313-330.
    7. Tristan Guillaume, 2011. "Some sequential boundary crossing results for geometric Brownian motion and their applications in financial engineering," Post-Print hal-00924277, HAL.
    8. J. Mart'in Ovejero, 2022. "Vanna-Volga pricing for single and double barrier FX options," Papers 2211.12652, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    9. Kim, Jerim & Kim, Jeongsim & Joo Yoo, Hyun & Kim, Bara, 2015. "Pricing external barrier options in a regime-switching model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 123-143.
    10. Engelen, Peter-Jan & Kool, Clemens & Li, Ye, 2016. "A barrier options approach to modeling project failure: The case of hydrogen fuel infrastructure," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 33-56.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Carole Bernard & Phelim Boyle, 2011. "Monte Carlo methods for pricing discrete Parisian options," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 169-196.
    13. Zhang, Jiayi & Zhou, Ke, 2024. "Analytical valuation of vulnerable chained options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Yongsik Kim & Hyeong-Ohk Bae & Hyeng Keun Koo, 2014. "Option pricing and Greeks via a moving least square meshfree method," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(10), pages 1753-1764, October.
    15. Yuh‐Dauh Lyuu & Yu‐Quan Zhang, 2023. "Pricing multiasset time‐varying double‐barrier options with time‐dependent parameters," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 404-434, March.
    16. Doobae Jun & Hyejin Ku, 2013. "Valuation of American partial barrier options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 167-191, July.
    17. Feng, Yun & Huang, Bing-hua & Young, Martin & Zhou, Qi-yuan, 2015. "Decomposing and valuing convertible bonds: A new method based on exotic options," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 193-206.
    18. Takahiko Fujita & Masahiro Ishii, 2010. "Valuation of a Repriceable Executive Stock Option," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Youngchul Han & Geonwoo Kim, 2016. "Efficient Lattice Method for Valuing of Options with Barrier in a Regime Switching Model," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-14, October.
    20. Lian, Guanghua & Zhu, Song-Ping & Elliott, Robert J. & Cui, Zhenyu, 2017. "Semi-analytical valuation for discrete barrier options under time-dependent Lévy processes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 167-183.
    21. Keegan Mendonca & Vasileios E. Kontosakos & Athanasios A. Pantelous & Konstantin M. Zuev, 2018. "Efficient Pricing of Barrier Options on High Volatility Assets using Subset Simulation," Papers 1803.03364, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1405.5294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.