IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/0812.3705.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bilateral counterparty risk valuation with stochastic dynamical models and application to Credit Default Swaps

Author

Listed:
  • Damiano Brigo
  • Agostino Capponi

Abstract

We introduce the general arbitrage-free valuation framework for counterparty risk adjustments in presence of bilateral default risk, including default of the investor. We illustrate the symmetry in the valuation and show that the adjustment involves a long position in a put option plus a short position in a call option, both with zero strike and written on the residual net value of the contract at the relevant default times. We allow for correlation between the default times of the investor, counterparty and underlying portfolio risk factors. We use arbitrage-free stochastic dynamical models. We then specialize our analysis to Credit Default Swaps (CDS) as underlying portfolio, generalizing the work of Brigo and Chourdakis (2008) [5] who deal with unilateral and asymmetric counterparty risk. We introduce stochastic intensity models and a trivariate copula function on the default times exponential variables to model default dependence. Similarly to [5], we find that both default correlation and credit spread volatilities have a relevant and structured impact on the adjustment. Differently from [5], the two parties will now agree on the credit valuation adjustment. We study a case involving British Airways, Lehman Brothers and Royal Dutch Shell, illustrating the bilateral adjustments in concrete crisis situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Damiano Brigo & Agostino Capponi, 2008. "Bilateral counterparty risk valuation with stochastic dynamical models and application to Credit Default Swaps," Papers 0812.3705, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2009.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:0812.3705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0812.3705
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van der Zwaard, Thomas & Grzelak, Lech A. & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2021. "A computational approach to hedging Credit Valuation Adjustment in a jump-diffusion setting," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 391(C).
    2. Guglielmo D'Amico & Raimondo Manca & Giovanni Salvi, 2011. "Bivariate Semi-Markov Process for Counterparty Credit Risk," Papers 1112.0226, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2012.
    3. Damiano Brigo & Mirela Predescu & Agostino Capponi, 2010. "Credit Default Swaps Liquidity modeling: A survey," Papers 1003.0889, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2010.
    4. Li, Hui, 2009. "Double Impact on CVA for CDS: Wrong-Way Risk with Stochastic Recovery," MPRA Paper 19684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Enrico Biffis & David Blake & Lorenzo Pitotti & Ariel Sun, 2016. "The Cost of Counterparty Risk and Collateralization in Longevity Swaps," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 83(2), pages 387-419, June.
    6. Simonella, Roberta & Vázquez, Carlos, 2023. "XVA in a multi-currency setting with stochastic foreign exchange rates," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 59-79.
    7. Hui Li, 2013. "A Note On The Double Impact On Cva For Cds: Wrong-Way Risk With Stochastic Recovery," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 1-14.
    8. Cetina, Jill & Paddrik, Mark & Rajan, Sriram, 2018. "Stressed to the core: Counterparty concentrations and systemic losses in CDS markets," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 38-52.
    9. Damiano Brigo & Massimo Morini & Marco Tarenghi, 2009. "Credit Calibration with Structural Models: The Lehman case and Equity Swaps under Counterparty Risk," Papers 0912.4404, arXiv.org.
    10. Chuang Yi, 2011. "Dangerous Knowledge: Credit Value Adjustment With Credit Triggers," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 839-865.
    11. Ying Jiao & Huyên Pham, 2011. "Optimal investment with counterparty risk: a default-density model approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 725-753, December.
    12. Arregui, Iñigo & Simonella, Roberta & Vázquez, Carlos, 2022. "Total value adjustment for European options in a multi‐currency setting," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 413(C).
    13. Damiano Brigo & Cristin Buescu & Massimo Morini, 2011. "Impact of the first to default time on Bilateral CVA," Papers 1106.3496, arXiv.org.
    14. Mai Jan-Frederik & Scherer Matthias, 2013. "What makes dependence modeling challenging? Pitfalls and ways to circumvent them," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 30(4), pages 287-306, December.
    15. Damiano Brigo & Andrea Pallavicini & Vasileios Papatheodorou, 2009. "Bilateral counterparty risk valuation for interest-rate products: impact of volatilities and correlations," Papers 0911.3331, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2010.
    16. Yifan Yang & Frank J. Fabozzi & Michele Leonardo Bianchi, 2015. "Bilateral counterparty risk valuation adjustment with wrong way risk on collateralized commodity counterparty," Journal of Financial Engineering (JFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(01), pages 1-31.
    17. Arregui, Iñigo & Salvador, Beatriz & Vázquez, Carlos, 2017. "PDE models and numerical methods for total value adjustment in European and American options with counterparty risk," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 308(C), pages 31-53.
    18. Damiano Brigo, 2011. "Counterparty Risk FAQ: Credit VaR, PFE, CVA, DVA, Closeout, Netting, Collateral, Re-hypothecation, WWR, Basel, Funding, CCDS and Margin Lending," Papers 1111.1331, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2012.
    19. Dilip B. Madan, 2012. "From credit valuation adjustments to credit capital commitments," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(6), pages 839-845, April.
    20. Long Teng & Matthias Ehrhardt & Michael Günther, 2013. "Bilateral Counterparty Risk Valuation Of Cds Contracts With Simultaneous Defaults," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(07), pages 1-20.
    21. Bäuerle Nicole & Schmock Uwe, 2012. "Dependence properties of dynamic credit risk models," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 29(3), pages 243-268, August.
    22. Harvey J. Stein, 2016. "Fixing Risk Neutral Risk Measures," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-28, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:0812.3705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.