IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umaesp/13510.html

State Trading, Agricultural Marketing Boards, And The Role Of Government In Marketing

Author

Listed:
  • Dahl, Reynold P.

Abstract

The objectives of this paper are to (1) review the reasoning behind the extension of government into marketing operations in developing countries, (2) identify the principal types of marketing boards and state-trading operations that are found in developing countries and their functions, and (3) consider the question of balance between government and private enterprise in marketing with implications for research. . .

Suggested Citation

  • Dahl, Reynold P., 1972. "State Trading, Agricultural Marketing Boards, And The Role Of Government In Marketing," Staff Papers 13510, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13510
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.13510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/13510/files/21522.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.13510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayami, Yujiro & Peterson, Willis, 1972. "Social Returns to Public Information Services: Statistical Reporting of U. S. Farm Commodities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 119-130, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christophe Gouel, 2020. "The Value of Public Information in Storable Commodity Markets: Application to the Soybean Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 846-865, May.
    2. Kizito, Andrew M. & Donovan, Cynthia & Staatz, John M., 2012. "Impact of Agricultural Market Information Systems Activities on Market Performance in Mozambique: Mozambique Country Report," Food Security International Development Working Papers 169572, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    3. John W. Freebairn, 1975. "Forecasting For Australian Agriculture," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 19(3), pages 154-174, December.
    4. Vernon Ruttan, 1980. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 529-547, January.
    5. J. W. Freebairn, 1976. "The Value and Distribution of the Benefits of Commodity Price Outlook Information," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 52(2), pages 199-212, June.
    6. Gardner, Bruce L., 1997. "Returns to Policy-Related Social Science Research in Agriculture," Working Papers 197845, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    7. repec:ags:mididp:152396 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Antonovitz, Frances & Roe, Terry, 1986. "A Theoretical and Empirical Approach to the Value of Information in Risky Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 68(1), pages 105-114, February.
    9. Byerlee, Derek R. & Anderson, Jock R., 1982. "Risk, Utility and the Value of Information in Farmer Decision Making," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(03), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Bosch, Darrell J. & Lee, Katherine L., 1988. "The Farm Level Effects Of Better Access To Information: The Case Of Dart," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(2), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Schneeberger, Kenneth C., 1982. "Discussion: Valuation Of Crop And Livestock Reports: Methodological Issues And Questions," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(01), pages 1-2, July.
    12. Kizito, Andrew M., 2009. "Estimating the Benefits from Improved Market Information," Graduate Research Master's Degree Plan B Papers 48844, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    13. Rafsnider, Giles T. & Skold, Melvin D. & Driscoll, Richard S., 1983. "Increases In Costs And Returns Due To Intensifying Range Forage Production Surveys: An Information Economic Analysis," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(01), pages 1-10, July.
    14. Lindner, Bob, 1987. "Toward A Framework for Evaluating Agricultural Economics Research," Discussion Papers 315419, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    15. Ryan, Jim, 2002. "Assessing the impact of food policy research: rice trade policies in Viet Nam," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-29, February.
    16. Freebairn, John W., 1978. "An Evaluation of Outlook Information for Australian Agricultural Commodities," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(03), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Krog, David Russell, 1988. "Plant-process model corn yield forecasts for Iowa," ISU General Staff Papers 1988010108000010686, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Tomek, William G. & Robinson, Kenneth L., 1977. "PART V. Agricultural Price Analysis and Outlook," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337217.
    19. Marquis, Duane L. & Ray, Daryll E., 1981. "Use Of Stochastic Simulation To Value Improved Crop Forecast Information," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279419, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. David E. Schimmelpfennig & George W. Norton, 2005. "Assessing The Value Of Economics Research: The Case Of The Bias In The Consumer Price Index," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(4), pages 625-635, October.
    21. Paul W. Gallagher, 2009. "Roles for evolving markets, policies, and technology improvements in U.S. corn ethanol industry development," Regional Economic Development, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Apr, pages 12-33.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umaesp:13510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.