IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr04/208244.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Multi-stage Monte Carlo Sampling Based Stochastic Programming Model for the Dynamic Vehicle Allocation Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Wei
  • Machemehl, Randy

Abstract

Optimization under uncertainty has seen many applications in the industrial world. The objective of this paper is to study the stochastic dynamic vehicle allocation problem (SDVAP), which is faced by many trucking companies, container companies, rental car agencies and railroads. To maximize profits and to manage fleets of vehicles in both time and space, this paper has formulated a multistage stochastic programming based model for SDVAP. A Monte Carlo Sampling Based Algorithm has been proposed to solve SDVAP. A probabilistic statement regarding the quality of the solution from the Monte Carlo sampling method is also identified by introducing a lower bound and an upper bound of the obtained optimal solution. A five-stage experimental network was introduced for demonstration of this algorithm. The computational results indicated a solution of high quality when Monte Carlo sampling based algorithm is used for solving SDVAP, strongly suggesting that these algorithms can be used for real world applications for decision making under uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Wei & Machemehl, Randy, 2004. "A Multi-stage Monte Carlo Sampling Based Stochastic Programming Model for the Dynamic Vehicle Allocation Problem," 45th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Evanston, Illinois, March 21-23, 2004 208244, Transportation Research Forum.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr04:208244
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.208244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/208244/files/2004_MonteCarlo_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.208244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raymond K.-M. Cheung & Warren B. Powell, 2000. "Shape -- A Stochastic Hybrid Approximation Procedure for Two-Stage Stochastic Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 73-79, February.
    2. Kouwenberg, Roy, 2001. "Scenario generation and stochastic programming models for asset liability management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 279-292, October.
    3. Linos F. Frantzeskakis & Warren B. Powell, 1990. "A Successive Linear Approximation Procedure for Stochastic, Dynamic Vehicle Allocation Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 40-57, February.
    4. George B. Dantzig, 1955. "Linear Programming under Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3-4), pages 197-206, 04-07.
    5. Fleten, Stein-Erik & Hoyland, Kjetil & Wallace, Stein W., 2002. "The performance of stochastic dynamic and fixed mix portfolio models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 37-49, July.
    6. Zenios, Stavros A. & Holmer, Martin R. & McKendall, Raymond & Vassiadou-Zeniou, Christiana, 1998. "Dynamic models for fixed-income portfolio management under uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(10), pages 1517-1541, August.
    7. Raymond K. Cheung & Chuen-Yih Chen, 1998. "A Two-Stage Stochastic Network Model and Solution Methods for the Dynamic Empty Container Allocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 142-162, May.
    8. Warren B. Powell, 1986. "A Stochastic Model of the Dynamic Vehicle Allocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 117-129, May.
    9. George B. Dantzig & Philip Wolfe, 1960. "Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 101-111, February.
    10. Kjetil Høyland & Stein W. Wallace, 2001. "Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 295-307, February.
    11. John R. Birge, 1985. "Decomposition and Partitioning Methods for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 989-1007, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Wei, 2014. "Optimizing Strategic Allocation of Vehicles for One-Way Car-sharing Systems Under Demand Uncertainty," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 53(3).
    2. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Song, Haiqing & Cheung, Raymond K. & Wang, Haiyan, 2014. "An arc-exchange decomposition method for multistage dynamic networks with random arc capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 474-487.
    4. Gregory A. Godfrey & Warren B. Powell, 2002. "An Adaptive Dynamic Programming Algorithm for Dynamic Fleet Management, I: Single Period Travel Times," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 21-39, February.
    5. Ketabchi, Saeed & Behboodi-Kahoo, Malihe, 2015. "Augmented Lagrangian method within L-shaped method for stochastic linear programs," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 12-20.
    6. Fei, Xin & Gülpınar, Nalân & Branke, Jürgen, 2019. "Efficient solution selection for two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 918-929.
    7. Fang, Yong & Chen, Lihua & Fukushima, Masao, 2008. "A mixed R&D projects and securities portfolio selection model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 700-715, March.
    8. Jacek Gondzio & Roy Kouwenberg, 2001. "High-Performance Computing for Asset-Liability Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 879-891, December.
    9. Ekblom, J. & Blomvall, J., 2020. "Importance sampling in stochastic optimization: An application to intertemporal portfolio choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 106-119.
    10. Osorio, Maria A. & Gulpinar, Nalan & Rustem, Berc & Settergren, Reuben, 2004. "Post-tax optimization with stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(1), pages 152-168, August.
    11. Silvia Araújo dos Reis & José Eugenio Leal & Antônio Márcio Tavares Thomé, 2023. "A Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programming Model for Tactical Planning in the Soybean Supply Chain," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-26, August.
    12. Warren Powell & Andrzej Ruszczyński & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2004. "Learning Algorithms for Separable Approximations of Discrete Stochastic Optimization Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 814-836, November.
    13. Song, Haiqing & Huang, Huei-Chuen, 2008. "A successive convex approximation method for multistage workforce capacity planning problem with turnover," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 29-48, July.
    14. Jia Shu & Miao Song, 2014. "Dynamic Container Deployment: Two-Stage Robust Model, Complexity, and Computational Results," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 135-149, February.
    15. de Lange, Petter E. & Fleten, Stein-Erik & Gaivoronski, Alexei A., 2004. "Modeling financial reinsurance in the casualty insurance business via stochastic programming," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 991-1012, February.
    16. Dupacova, Jitka, 2002. "Applications of stochastic programming: Achievements and questions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 281-290, July.
    17. Fleten, Stein-Erik & Hoyland, Kjetil & Wallace, Stein W., 2002. "The performance of stochastic dynamic and fixed mix portfolio models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 37-49, July.
    18. Raymond K. Cheung & Chuen-Yih Chen, 1998. "A Two-Stage Stochastic Network Model and Solution Methods for the Dynamic Empty Container Allocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 142-162, May.
    19. Gulpinar, Nalan & Rustem, Berc & Settergren, Reuben, 2004. "Simulation and optimization approaches to scenario tree generation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1291-1315, April.
    20. Wu, Dexiang & Wu, Desheng Dash, 2020. "A decision support approach for two-stage multi-objective index tracking using improved lagrangian decomposition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr04:208244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://trforum.org/annual-forum/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.