IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/miscgh/358577.html

Mining Communities Perception of Open Pit Operations: The Case of the People of Brahabebome

Author

Listed:
  • Coleman, Clarence Bosompim

Abstract

Economic liberalisation in Ghana has made the hitherto unprofitable mining sector the most viable sector of the economy over the past decade. Cost effectiveness consideration and improved extraction technologies have combined to make open pit mining the preferred method of mining among the large number of mining companies operating in the country. However, the open pit mining has some perceived environmental consequences. The subject matter of this dissertation is to find out the perception of people of Brahabebome of the effect of surface mining operations on the environment. The study was carried out at Brahabebome a small community in the Wassa West District of the Western Region. The objective of the study is to investigate the perception of the people on the effect of surface mining activities on the environment. Primary data were as obtained by using simple random sampling to select 100 household heads and structured questionnaires administered to them. Again structured questionnaires were administered to regulatory institutions and other stakeholders as well as a non-governmental organisation. The study sought to find out the perception of the community of the effect of surface mining operations on water, air, forest land and birds and animals. Simple percentages were used to analyse the field data. It was found out from the study that 33% of respondents disliked surface mining activities because of the noise generated during operations; 31% of respondents disliked surface mining because of the perceived pollution of streams and other water sources. Also 29% of respondents mentioned dust generated during surface mining operations as their major dislike of surface mining operations and 5% of respondents the degradation of land. From the study it was found out that majority of respondents 98% rated the contribution of surface mining activities to noise generation as very significant. Further, it was found from the study that 74% of respondents share the view that the contribution of surface mining to air pollution was very significant. Additionally, 94% of respondents rated the contribution of surface mining to the removal of vegetation and forest cover as very significant 96% of respondents rated the contribution of surface mining activities to the destruction of farmlands as very significant or above average. Excavation due to surface mining is perceived to have badly denuded the land and with inhabitants limited as to the type crops to be cultivated very few, 4% of respondents are engaged in farming. It is recommended amongst others that excess land which is not needed for surface mining operations must be ceded to the community to enable them engage in farming and other related activities. Furthermore, Government must provide the policy and legislative framework for a process by which the mining firms, Government, non-governmental Organisations (NGO’s) and the community can communicate in a proactive and constructive way which will allow mining firms minimize the perceived negative effects on the local community.

Suggested Citation

  • Coleman, Clarence Bosompim, 2003. "Mining Communities Perception of Open Pit Operations: The Case of the People of Brahabebome," Miscellaneous Publications 358577, University of Ghana, Institute of Statistical Social & Economic Research (ISSER).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:miscgh:358577
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.358577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/358577/files/MA_2003_Clarence_Bosompim_Coleman.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.358577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 1998. "The concept of sustainable economic development," Chapters, in: The Economics of Environment and Development, chapter 1, pages 1-21, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Colby, M.E., 1990. "Environmental Management In Development: The Evolution Of Paradigms," World Bank - Discussion Papers 80, World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongbin Li & Xinzheng Shi, 2025. "The effect of the one-child policy on fertility in China: identification based on difference-in-differences," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 1-31, March.
    2. Randøy, Trond & Strøm, R. Øystein & Mersland, Roy, 2015. "The Impact of Entrepreneur-CEOs in Microfinance Institutions: A Global Survey," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 39(4), pages 927-953.
    3. Sabine Liebenehm & Ingmar Schumacher & Eric Strobl, 2024. "Rainfall shocks and risk aversion: Evidence from Southeast Asia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(1), pages 145-176, January.
    4. Taylor, Donald C., 1992. "Underlying Values and Beliefs "Modern Science" Versus "Sustainable Development"," Economics Staff Papers 232225, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Paramasivam Ramasamy & Umanath Malaiarasan, 2023. "Agricultural credit in India: determinants and effects," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 169-195, June.
    6. Bandhu, Sarvesh & Lahkar, Ratul, 2025. "Implementing efficiency with equality," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Gendron, Corinne, 2014. "Beyond environmental and ecological economics: Proposal for an economic sociology of the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 240-253.
    8. Tarja Ketola, 2007. "Ten years later: where is our common future now?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 171-189, March.
    9. Soderbaum, P, 1990. "Neoclassical and Institutional Approaches to Agriculture, Environment and Development," 1990 Symposium, Agricultural Restructuring in Southern Africa, July 24-27, 1990, Swakopmund, Namibia 183532, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Maitra, Sudeshna, 2024. "On the theory and measurement of relative poverty using durable ownership data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 153-169.
    11. Gautam Bose & Arghya Ghosh, 2022. "Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity, or just tax the rich? Development, efficiency, and the pursuit of equity," Discussion Papers 2022-02, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    12. Roumasset, James A., 2024. "The Microeconomics of Agricultural Development: Risk, Institutions, and Agricultural Policy," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 21(AJAD 20th), October.
    13. Stark, Oded & Pang, Yu & Fan, Simon, 2024. "Agglomeration, Pollution, and Migration: A Substantial Link, and Policy Design," EconStor Open Access Book Chapters, in: World Scientific Handbook of Global Migration, Volume 3: Types of Migrants and Economies: A Global Perspective, pages 199-225, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Jean-Marie Baland & Guilhem Cassan & François Woitrin, 2024. "Stopping rule as sex-selective abortions and instrumental births. A unified framework and world evidence," DeFiPP Working Papers 2406, University of Namur, Development Finance and Public Policies.
    15. Massoud Karshenas, 1994. "Environment, Technology and Employment: Towards a New Definition of Sustainable Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 25(4), pages 723-756, October.
    16. Olga Navickienė & Asta Valackienė & Renata Činčikaitė & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, 2023. "A Theoretical Model of the Development of Public Citizenship in a Sustainable Environment: Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Norgaard, Richard B., 1992. "Sustainability and the economics of assuring assets for future generations," Policy Research Working Paper Series 832, The World Bank.
    18. Jiancai Pi & Xinyi Liu, 2024. "Pollution control and multinational firms," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 20(1), pages 3-27, March.
    19. Balu Pawde & Tara Shankar Shaw & Pushpa L. Trivedi, 2024. "Manufacturing Activity and Inequality in India," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 22(4), pages 911-944, December.
    20. Yiyao Li, 2024. "How do Capacity-Based National Development Planning Play a Role in Achieving Integrated Development Goals?—A Quantitative comparative study in the Context Of China's Five-Year Plan," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 593-612, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:miscgh:358577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/issergh.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.