IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/miscgh/358577.html

Mining Communities Perception of Open Pit Operations: The Case of the People of Brahabebome

Author

Listed:
  • Coleman, Clarence Bosompim

Abstract

Economic liberalisation in Ghana has made the hitherto unprofitable mining sector the most viable sector of the economy over the past decade. Cost effectiveness consideration and improved extraction technologies have combined to make open pit mining the preferred method of mining among the large number of mining companies operating in the country. However, the open pit mining has some perceived environmental consequences. The subject matter of this dissertation is to find out the perception of people of Brahabebome of the effect of surface mining operations on the environment. The study was carried out at Brahabebome a small community in the Wassa West District of the Western Region. The objective of the study is to investigate the perception of the people on the effect of surface mining activities on the environment. Primary data were as obtained by using simple random sampling to select 100 household heads and structured questionnaires administered to them. Again structured questionnaires were administered to regulatory institutions and other stakeholders as well as a non-governmental organisation. The study sought to find out the perception of the community of the effect of surface mining operations on water, air, forest land and birds and animals. Simple percentages were used to analyse the field data. It was found out from the study that 33% of respondents disliked surface mining activities because of the noise generated during operations; 31% of respondents disliked surface mining because of the perceived pollution of streams and other water sources. Also 29% of respondents mentioned dust generated during surface mining operations as their major dislike of surface mining operations and 5% of respondents the degradation of land. From the study it was found out that majority of respondents 98% rated the contribution of surface mining activities to noise generation as very significant. Further, it was found from the study that 74% of respondents share the view that the contribution of surface mining to air pollution was very significant. Additionally, 94% of respondents rated the contribution of surface mining to the removal of vegetation and forest cover as very significant 96% of respondents rated the contribution of surface mining activities to the destruction of farmlands as very significant or above average. Excavation due to surface mining is perceived to have badly denuded the land and with inhabitants limited as to the type crops to be cultivated very few, 4% of respondents are engaged in farming. It is recommended amongst others that excess land which is not needed for surface mining operations must be ceded to the community to enable them engage in farming and other related activities. Furthermore, Government must provide the policy and legislative framework for a process by which the mining firms, Government, non-governmental Organisations (NGO’s) and the community can communicate in a proactive and constructive way which will allow mining firms minimize the perceived negative effects on the local community.

Suggested Citation

  • Coleman, Clarence Bosompim, 2003. "Mining Communities Perception of Open Pit Operations: The Case of the People of Brahabebome," Miscellaneous Publications 358577, University of Ghana, Institute of Statistical Social & Economic Research (ISSER).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:miscgh:358577
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.358577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/358577/files/MA_2003_Clarence_Bosompim_Coleman.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.358577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 1998. "The concept of sustainable economic development," Chapters, in: The Economics of Environment and Development, chapter 1, pages 1-21, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Colby, M.E., 1990. "Environmental Management In Development: The Evolution Of Paradigms," World Bank - Discussion Papers 80, World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bramoullé, Y. & Ghiglino, C., 2024. "Status Consumption in Networks: A Reference Dependent Approach," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2414, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Karimi, Abdul Hakim, 2024. "Measuring Sustainability Literacy: Scale Development and Validation," MPRA Paper 122875, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Hongbin Li & Xinzheng Shi, 2025. "The effect of the one-child policy on fertility in China: identification based on difference-in-differences," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Randøy, Trond & Strøm, R. Øystein & Mersland, Roy, 2015. "The Impact of Entrepreneur-CEOs in Microfinance Institutions: A Global Survey," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 39(4), pages 927-953.
    5. Gloria Claudio‐Quiroga & Carlos Poza, 2024. "Measuring the circular economy in Europe: Big differences among countries, great opportunities to converge," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4707-4725, October.
    6. Sugata Marjit & Suryaprakash Mishra, 2023. "Credit market imperfection, lack of entrepreneurship and capital outflow from a developing economy," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1855-1873, August.
    7. Pascale Combes Motel & Jean-Louis Combes & Bao-We-Wal Bambe & Chantale Riziki Oweggi, 2023. "Does Climate Change Affect Firms’ Innovative Capacity in Developing Countries ?," Working Papers hal-04341934, HAL.
    8. Elands, Birgit H. M. & Wiersum, K. Freerk, 2001. "Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of socio-political discourses," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1-2), pages 5-16, September.
    9. Sabine Liebenehm & Ingmar Schumacher & Eric Strobl, 2024. "Rainfall shocks and risk aversion: Evidence from Southeast Asia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(1), pages 145-176, January.
    10. Philip Bond & Ashok S. Rai, 2004. "Cosigned Or Group Loans," Department of Economics Working Papers 2004-08, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    11. Donald, Aletheia & Goldstein, Markus & Koroknay-Palicz, Tricia & Sage, Mathilde, 2024. "The Fertility Impacts of Development Programs," IZA Discussion Papers 17500, IZA Network @ LISER.
    12. Zheyi Zhu & Yuxin Chen & Ke Ning & Zengjin Liu, 2024. "Policy setting, heterogeneous scale, and willingness to adopt green production behavior: field evidence from cooperatives in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1529-1555, January.
    13. Taylor, Donald C., 1992. "Underlying Values and Beliefs "Modern Science" Versus "Sustainable Development"," Economics Staff Papers 232225, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    14. Erfurth, Philipp, 2024. "Unequal unification? Income inequality and unification in nineteenth century Italy and Germany," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Garibah Mensah Dominic & Dolly Paul Carlo, 2024. "Exploring The Perspectives of Child Labour Victims on The Sociocultural Determinants of Child Labour: A Case of Yeji on Lake Volta," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(5), pages 2089-2111, May.
    16. Yifan Li & Qiaozhuan Liang, 2024. "A Comparative Study of Two Networked (neoendogenous) Development Approaches: The EU LEADER and China’s Resident Work Team in Poor Villages (RWTIPV)," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 387-411, August.
    17. Duo Qin & Marie Anne Cagas & Geoffrey Ducanes & Xinhua He & Rui Liu & Shiguo Liu, 2006. "Income Disparity and Economic Growth: Evidence from People's Republic of China," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 84, Asian Development Bank.
    18. Paramasivam Ramasamy & Umanath Malaiarasan, 2023. "Agricultural credit in India: determinants and effects," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 169-195, June.
    19. Bandhu, Sarvesh & Lahkar, Ratul, 2025. "Implementing efficiency with equality," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Gendron, Corinne, 2014. "Beyond environmental and ecological economics: Proposal for an economic sociology of the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 240-253.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:miscgh:358577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/issergh.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.