IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/lsustb/31681.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Bioeconomics Of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Kazmierczak, Richard F., Jr.
  • Caffey, Rex H.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to produce a detailed aquaculture production model incorporating constraints unique to closed system culture and to conduct a formal economic analysis of closed system operation. Results generated by this model indicate that less than perfect management ability can eliminate the normal advantages associated with using high protein feed. While higher protein levels produce faster growth, and for this reason are often used in the industry, the increased direct feed costs and indirect costs due to metabolic feedbacks produce lower daily returns if high protein feed use continues through harvest. This model showed that inefficiency in solids removal negatively affects returns, but the majority of negative impacts were linked to declines in biological filter efficiency. As biological filter efficiency falls, time to harvest increases at an increasing rate and returns decrease at an increasing rate. Results also indicate that as stocking density increased, direct increases in returns were assured only if no metabolic feedbacks occurred. If the filter technology is operated inefficiently, higher stocking density may actually lead to economic failure. Thus, a tradeoff exists between stocking density and management ability, with the tradeoff being substantially affected by levels of dietary protein. In essence, economically viable tradeoffs between dietary protein and stocking density occur over relatively narrow ranges of management ability. Without highly experienced and capable management, the biological realities of recirculating systems may preclude profitable system operation. These simulated observations may in part explain why recirculating systems have yet to demonstrate widespread success on a commercial scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazmierczak, Richard F., Jr. & Caffey, Rex H., 1996. "The Bioeconomics Of Recirculating Aquaculture Systems," Station Bulletins 31681, Louisiana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:lsustb:31681
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31681/files/sb854.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oscar J. Cacho & Henry Kinnucan & Upton Hatch, 1991. "Optimal Control of Fish Growth," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(1), pages 174-183.
    2. Talpaz, Hovav & Tsur, Yacov, 1982. "Optimising aquaculture management of a single-species fish population," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 127-142, September.
    3. Larry Karp & Arye Sadeh & Wade L. Griffin, 1986. "Cycles in Agricultural Production: The Case of Aquaculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(3), pages 553-561.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Run & Leung, PingSun, 2009. "Optimal harvest time in continuous aquacultural production: The case of nonhomogeneous production cycles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 267-270, February.
    2. Sadeh, Arye & Griffin, Wade L., 1997. "Value of feedback in agricultural decisions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(2-3), pages 285-301.
    3. Yu, Run & Leung, PingSun, 2005. "Optimal harvesting strategies for a multi-cycle and multi-pond shrimp operation: A practical network model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 339-354.
    4. Domínguez-May, Roger & Poot-López, Gaspar R. & Hernández, Juan & Gasca-Leyva, Eucario, 2020. "Dynamic optimal ration size in tilapia culture: Economic and environmental considerations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    5. Hennessy, David A., 2006. "Feeding and the Equilibrium Feeder Animal Price-Weight Schedule," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Lawrence, John D. & Kaylen, Michael S., 1990. "Risk Management For Livestock Producers: Hedging And Contract Production," Staff Papers 13496, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    7. Kjell Holmåker & Thomas Sterner, 1999. "Growth or environmental concern: which comes first? Optimal control with pure stock pollutants," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 2(3), pages 167-185, September.
    8. Nikolaos Mykoniatis & Richard Ready, 2016. "Spatial Harvest Regimes for a Sedentary Fishery," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(2), pages 357-387, October.
    9. Juan Hernández Guerra & Miguel León Santana & Carmelo León González, 2003. "Optiminación Dinámica en la gestión del cultivo de la dorada en la región mediterranea y canaria," Documentos de trabajo conjunto ULL-ULPGC 2003-05, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la ULPGC.
    10. Kjell Holmåker & Thomas Sterner, 1999. "Growth or environmental concern: which comes first? Optimal control with pure stock pollutants," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 2(3), pages 167-185, September.
    11. Atle Oglend & Vesa-Heikki Soini, 2020. "Implications of Entry Restrictions to Address Externalities in Aquaculture: The Case of Salmon Aquaculture," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(4), pages 673-694, December.
    12. Tipraqsa, Prasnee & Craswell, Eric T. & Noble, Andrew D. & Schmidt-Vogt, Dietrich, 2007. "Resource integration for multiple benefits: Multifunctionality of integrated farming systems in Northeast Thailand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 694-703, June.
    13. Hernandez, Juan M. & Leon-Santana, Miguel & Leon, Carmelo J., 2007. "The role of the water temperature in the optimal management of marine aquaculture," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 872-886, September.
    14. Frank Jensen & Rasmus Nielsen & Henrik Meilby, 2023. "Regulation of aquaculture production," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 25(2), pages 161-204, April.
    15. Mykoniatis, Nikolaos & Ready, Richard C., 2012. "Optimal Oyster Management in Chesapeake Bay Incorporating Sanctuaries, Reserves, Aquaculture and Externalities," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124613, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. McClelland, John W. & Wetzstein, Michael E. & Noles, Richard K., 1987. "Optimal Replacement Policies for Recyclable Assets," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270113, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Farm Management; Production Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:lsustb:31681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dalsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.