IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma07/345421.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PR - Strategic Management Of Farm Businesses: The Role Of Strategy Tools With Particular Reference To The Balanced Scorecard

Author

Listed:
  • Shadbolt, Nicola M.

Abstract

Strategic management has been described as being different from other levels of management in several ways. It is non-routine, non-programmable, unique and creative, more ambiguous, uncertain and complex than ‘operational’ management and yet it has the greatest impact on the future of the business. There are a number of strategy tools available that can be used by farm businesses to guide strategic thinking, strategic decision-making and strategy implementation. The range of strategy tools used by rural professionals is not wide; of particular note is the observed misuse of the SWOT analysis with subsequent poor identification of external opportunities. The use of the balanced scorecard (BSC) tool is described and how it has been adapted for use in farm and ranching businesses discussed. To be successful, both farm and non-farm businesses can and have utilised the flexibility provided by the BSC tool to design a framework that fits their purpose and delivers to their vision.

Suggested Citation

  • Shadbolt, Nicola M., 2007. "PR - Strategic Management Of Farm Businesses: The Role Of Strategy Tools With Particular Reference To The Balanced Scorecard," 16th Congress, Cork, Ireland, July 15-20, 2007 345421, International Farm Management Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma07:345421
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345421/files/07Shadbolt.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345421?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shadbolt, Nicola M. & Beeby, N. & Brier, B. & Gardner, John W.G., 2003. "A Critique of the Use of the Balanced Scorecard in Multi-Enterprise Family Farm Businesses," 14th Congress, Perth, Western Australia, August 10-15, 2003 24380, International Farm Management Association.
    2. Henry Mintzberg & James A. Waters, 1985. "Of strategies, deliberate and emergent," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 257-272, July.
    3. Andersson, Per, 2002. "Competence Development Program for the Farmer with Reference to Life as Well as Business," 13th Congress, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 7-12, 2002 7007, International Farm Management Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan Chen & Xinglong Yang & Nicola Shadbolt, 2020. "The Balanced Scorecard as a Tool Evaluating the Sustainable Performance of Chinese Emerging Family Farms—Evidence from Jilin Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Andreasson, Martin & Karabag, Solmaz Filiz & Simonsson, Johan & Agarwal, Girish, 2024. "Dynamics of related and unrelated digital diversification in established firms: Strategies, programs, process, and outcomes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. José Luis Esparza-Aguilar & Argentina Soto-Maciel & Ma. Isabel De la Garza-Ramos, 2016. "Entrepreneurial orientation in Mexican family businesses," Journal of Economic and Financial Studies (JEFS), LAR Center Press, vol. 4(6), pages 29-39, December.
    4. Martín-Rojas, Rodrigo & García-Morales, Victor J. & Garrido-Moreno, Aurora & Salmador-Sánchez, Maria Paz, 2021. "Social Media Use and the Challenge of Complexity: Evidence from the Technology Sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 621-640.
    5. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    6. Sirén, Charlotta & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Stretching strategic learning to the limit: The interaction between strategic planning and learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 653-663.
    7. Patrick Hoverstadt & Lucy Loh, 2024. "Back to basics: Developing systems methodologies from first (systems) principles," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 207-215, January.
    8. Marina Fiedler & Isabell Welpe & Arnold Picot, 2010. "Understanding Radical Change: An Examination of Management Departments in German-speaking Universities," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 21(2), pages 111-134.
    9. Chenhall, Robert H. & Hall, Matthew & Smith, David, 2010. "Social capital and management control systems: A study of a non-government organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 737-756, November.
    10. Ali, Abdul & Mancha, Ruben & Pachamanova, Dessislava, 2018. "Correcting analytics maturity myopia," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 211-219.
    11. Sinfield, J.V. & Ajmani, A. & McShane, W., 2024. "Strategic roadmapping to accelerate and risk-mitigate enabling innovations: A generalizable method and a case illustration for marine renewable energy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    12. Petra Andries & Dirk Czarnitzki, 2014. "Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 21-38, June.
    13. Nicolas Lesca & Marie-Laurence Caron-Fasan, 2005. "La veille vue comme un système cybernétique," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(4), pages 93-120, December.
    14. Gebauer, Heiko & Worch, Hagen & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 57-73.
    15. De Leeuw, A. C. J. & Volberda, H. W., 1996. "On the concept of flexibility: A dual control perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 121-139, April.
    16. Young-Choon Kim & Taekjin Shin & Sangchan Park, 2021. "Enhancing firm performance through intra-group managerial experience: Evidence from group-affiliated firms in Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 435-465, June.
    17. Camille Guirou & Laurent Beduneau-Wang, 2025. "Vizualizing & strategizing public value : Make it visible, make it public !," Post-Print halshs-05044452, HAL.
    18. Iman Seoudi & Matthias Huehn & Bo Carlsson, 2008. "Penrose Revisited: A Re-Appraisal of the Resource Perspective," Working Papers 14, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    19. Yannick LUNG & Bernard JULLIEN & Christophe MIDLER, 2016. "From the Logan to the Kwid. \r\nAmbidexterity, reverse and fractal innovation, design-to-cost: recipes from Renault\'s Entry strategy," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2016-19, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    20. Nurmi, Raimo, 1998. "Knowledge-intensive firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 26-32.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma07:345421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.