IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gmcc15/211638.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The current status of GM/non-GM canola coexistence in Australian broadacre farming systems and likely future challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Alcock, K.T.

Abstract

In a difficult and challenging political environment, the Australian grains industry has implemented a GM/non-GM canola coexistence framework that has succeeded in meeting market requirements for six seasons, with the seventh this year. The processes in place have enabled the industry to supply local demand and to deliver to two thirds to three quarters of production to GM and non-GM export markets, with non-GM canola to Europe as the largest single market. The challenges and impediments to this practical success have been idealistic rather than scientific, but are on-going. Two of the five Australian States where canola is grown maintain ‘moratoriums’ prohibiting GM crops under State Government legislation and the Australian Green Party and some State Labor Parties maintain policies to prohibit GM crops. Activist groups associated with the conservation lobbies and the organic food industry maintain their rage against GM crops. The organic food peak body, the Organic Federation of Australia, maintains a ‘zero tolerance’ policy on GM presence in crops and produce of all types (not just canola) and even to the land. This policy has led to the one single legal case over coexistence brought by an organic grower over GM canola material blown over a fence onto an organic farm (but with no presence within crop or produce). The case was tried and rejected and it was held that the GM producer was fully entitled to follow his industry standard practices, which including his complying with existing coexistence protocols. The key driver of the uptake of the glyphosate-tolerant GM varieties in use is herbicide resistance, which in Australia and particularly in Western Australian no-till systems represents a global worst case scenario, and includes glyphosate resistance in key weeds. Roundup Ready canola as a component of crop rotation is a valuable tool but it is accepted that it cannot be over-used and that, on balance, growers should rotate Roundup Ready canola with other canola cultivars attuned to different herbicide components as a part of a comprehensive herbicide resistance management framework. The growing of GM and non-GM canola on the same property accentuates the need for strict adherence to coexistence management through the production and marketing chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Alcock, K.T., 2015. "The current status of GM/non-GM canola coexistence in Australian broadacre farming systems and likely future challenges," GMCC-15: Seventh GMCC, November 17-20, 2015, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 211638, International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gmcc15:211638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/211638
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koo, Won W. & Jinding, Lin, 1992. "An Intersectoral Perspective on the Relationship between the Agricultural and Industrial Sectors in Chinese Economic Development," Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197870, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Foster, Kenneth A. & Mwanaumo, Anthony, 1995. "Estimation of dynamic maize supply response in Zambia," Agricultural Economics of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(1), April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Australia; canola; coexistence; litigation; Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gmcc15:211638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.