IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi18/275848.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agrarholzanbau In Der Deutschen Landwirt-Schaft: Ergebnisse Einer Empirischen Erhebung

Author

Listed:
  • Beer, Lara
  • Schaper, Christian
  • Theuvsen, Ludwig

Abstract

Prognosen zufolge wird es in der EU bis 2030 eine Bedarfslücke für biogene Festbrennstoffe geben, die aufgrund verschiedener Restriktionen nicht allein durch die Nutzung von „Wald-holz“ geschlossen werden kann. Laut Experten bedarf es daher zukünftig eines vermehrten Anbaus von Energieholz auf landwirtschaftlichen Flächen, um diese Bedarfslücke zu schlie-ßen. Bei der Betrachtung der aktuellen Anbauzahlen von Agrarholz wird jedoch deutlich, dass die Bereitschaft deutscher Landwirte zum Anbau bislang noch sehr gering ist. Um die poten-tielle Bereitschaft von Landwirten zum Agrarholzanbau besser einschätzen zu können und mögliche Zielgruppen für eine Ausweitung des Agrarholzanbaus in Deutschland zu identifi-zieren, wurde im vorliegenden Beitrag eine deutschlandweite Online-Umfrage unter 285 Landwirten durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse der Analyse zeigen einerseits, dass Landwirte ins-gesamt eine eher ablehnende Haltung gegenüber Agrarholz vertreten, andererseits zeigen sie aber auch, dass Landwirte hinsichtlich ihrer Anbaubereitschaft nicht als homogene Gruppe verstanden werden dürfen. Mittels einer Clusteranalyse konnten fünf unterschiedliche Grup-pen von Landwirten ermittelt werden, die sich teils erheblich in ihren Einstellungen zu Agrar-holz sowie ihrer Bereitschaft, Agrarholz anzubauen, unterscheiden. Auf der Grundlage der Ergebnisse der empirischen Analyse können abschließend Handlungsempfehlungen für eine Ausweitung des Agrarholzanbaus abgeleitet werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Beer, Lara & Schaper, Christian & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2018. "Agrarholzanbau In Der Deutschen Landwirt-Schaft: Ergebnisse Einer Empirischen Erhebung," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275848, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi18:275848
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.275848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/275848/files/Vortrag_154.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.275848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zschache, Ulrike & Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan von & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2009. "Die öffentliche Auseinandersetzung über Bioenergie in den Massenmedien: diskursanalytische Grundlagen und erste Ergebnisse," DARE Discussion Papers 0906, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Glithero, Neryssa J. & Wilson, Paul & Ramsden, Stephen J., 2013. "Prospects for arable farm uptake of Short Rotation Coppice willow and miscanthus in England," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 209-218.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Otter, Verena & Deutsch, Maximilian, 2023. "Did policy lose sight of the wood for the trees? An UTAUT-based partial least squares estimation of farmers acceptance of innovative sustainable land use systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beer, Lara & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2020. "Factors influencing German farmer’s decision to grow alley cropping systems as ecological focus areas: a regression analysis," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    2. Ben Fradj, Nosra & Jayet, Pierre Alain & Rozakis, Stelios & Georganta, Eleni & Jędrejek, Anna, 2020. "Contribution of agricultural systems to the bioeconomy in Poland: Integration of willow in the context of a stylised CAP diversification," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Zafeiriou, Eleni & Petridis, Konstantinos & Karelakis, Christos & Arabatzis, Garyfallos, 2016. "Optimal combination of energy crops under different policy scenarios; The case of Northern Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 607-616.
    4. Witzel, Carl-Philipp & Finger, Robert, 2016. "Economic evaluation of Miscanthus production – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 681-696.
    5. Calliope Panoutsou & Efthymia Alexopoulou, 2020. "Costs and Profitability of Crops for Bioeconomy in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Choi, Hyung Sik & Entenmann, Steffen K., 2019. "Land in the EU for perennial biomass crops from freed-up agricultural land: A sensitivity analysis considering yields, diet, market liberalization and world food prices," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 292-306.
    7. Weiss, Daniel & Nemeczek, Fabian, 2021. "A text-based monitoring tool for the legitimacy and guidance of technological innovation systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Jule Schulze & Karin Frank & Joerg A Priess & Markus A Meyer, 2016. "Assessing Regional-Scale Impacts of Short Rotation Coppices on Ecosystem Services by Modeling Land-Use Decisions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Wilson, P. & Glithero, N.J. & Ramsden, S.J., 2014. "Prospects for dedicated energy crop production and attitudes towards agricultural straw use: The case of livestock farmers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 101-110.
    10. Wang, Zhanwu & Wang, Zhenfeng & Tahir, Nadeem & Wang, Heng & Li, Jin & Xu, Guangyin, 2020. "Study of synergetic development in straw power supply chain: Straw price and government subsidy as incentive," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    11. Adams, P.W.R. & Lindegaard, K., 2016. "A critical appraisal of the effectiveness of UK perennial energy crops policy since 1990," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 188-202.
    12. Parra-López, Carlos & Holley, Martin & Lindegaard, Kevin & Sayadi, Samir & Esteban-López, Gonzalo & Durán-Zuazo, Víctor H. & Knauer, Christoph & Engelbrechten, Hans-Georg von & Winterber, Ralf & Henri, 2017. "Strengthening the development of the short-rotation plantations bioenergy sector: Policy insights from six European countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 781-793.
    13. van Tol, M.C.M. & Moncada, J.A. & Lukszo, Z. & Weijnen, M., 2021. "Modelling the interaction between policies and international trade flows for liquid biofuels: an agent-based modelling approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Glithero, N.J. & Wilson, P. & Ramsden, S.J., 2015. "Optimal combinable and dedicated energy crop scenarios for marginal land," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 82-91.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi18:275848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.