IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Irrigation infrastructure charging: Non-rival access, cost sharing and exclusion


  • Beare, Stephen
  • Heaney, Anna
  • Pechey, Lili


Many irrigation areas are facing the problems of aging infrastructure and a declining revenue base from which to fund maintenance and repair activities. The push toward full cost recovery for storage and delivery services arising from water reform policies means that some supply utilities will need to consider the strategic rationalisation of infrastructure to remain viable in the long term. Consideration must also be given to the implementation of appropriate charging regimes for infrastructure access to ensure that irrigators are not sub-optimally excluded from the delivery system. Below the point of congestion, non-volumetric charges for access to irrigation infrastructure are analogous to a pricing regime for a non-rival but exclusive good. Two charging models for infrastructure access are analysed in this paper – socialised cost sharing and serial cost sharing – in the context of the efficient provision of a non-rival good. Findings indicate that over-rationalisation may occur under a socialised cost sharing model but that this potential is eliminated under a serial cost sharing model.

Suggested Citation

  • Beare, Stephen & Heaney, Anna & Pechey, Lili, 2006. "Irrigation infrastructure charging: Non-rival access, cost sharing and exclusion," 2006 Conference (50th), February 8-10, 2006, Sydney, Australia 137992, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare06:137992

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Hervé Moulin, 1994. "Serial Cost-Sharing of Excludable Public Goods," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 305-325.
    2. S. C. Littlechild & G. Owen, 1973. "A Simple Expression for the Shapley Value in a Special Case," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 370-372, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Community/Rural/Urban Development;


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare06:137992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.