IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea85/278618.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Direct Payments And Acreage Reduction: An Estimate Of Program Induced Export Subsidies And Taxes

Author

Listed:
  • Zellner, James A.

Abstract

Estimates of export subsidy or tax equivalents of commodity price and income support programs were made, incorporating parti— cipation and slippage effects. If a ten percent or larger acreage reduction program is required the program is an implicit export tax. Larger acreage reductions resulted in larger implicit taxes.

Suggested Citation

  • Zellner, James A., 1985. "Direct Payments And Acreage Reduction: An Estimate Of Program Induced Export Subsidies And Taxes," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278618, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea85:278618
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278618/files/aaea-1985-069.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gallagher, Paul & Green, Robert C., 1984. "A Cropland Use Model: Theory And Suggestions For Estimating Planted Acreage Response," Staff Reports 277586, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Gallagher, Paul W. & Green, Robert C., 1984. "A Cropland Use Model," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10764, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Salathe, Larry E. & Price, J. Michael & Gadson, Kenneth E., 1982. "The Food and Agricultural Policy Simulator," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 34(2), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Gadson, Kenneth E. & Price, J. Michael & Salathe, Larry E., 1982. "Food And Agricultural Policy Simulator (Fapsim): Structural Equations And Variable Definitions," Staff Reports 276743, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. J. P. Houck & M. E. Ryan, 1972. "Supply Analysis for Corn in the United States: The Impact of Changing Government Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 184-191.
    6. Paarlberg, Philip L., 1984. "When Are Export Subsidies Rational?," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 36(1), pages 1-7, January.
    7. Houck, James P. & Ryan, Mary E., 1972. "Supply Analysis For Corn In The United States: The Impact Of Changing Government Programs," Staff Papers 13554, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Miller, Thomas A., 1974. "Estimating the Income Supplement in Farm Program Payments," Technical Bulletins 158583, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoffman, Linwood A. & Livezey, Janet, 1987. "The U.S. Oats Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305462, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Westcott, Paul C. & Hull, David B., 1985. "A Quarterly Forecasting Model for U.S. Agriculture," Technical Bulletins 156815, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Hoffman, Linwood A. & Sronce, Philip W., 1987. "Oats Imports, The U.S. Market, And Government Programs," Staff Reports 277951, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Jeon, Jong-Pyeong, 1989. "The impacts of policy alternatives and foreign demand fluctuations on the US rice market," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010204, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Chen, Dean T. & Ito, Shoichi, 1989. "Modeling Supply Response for Rice Program Analysis: An Application of Implicit Revenue Switching Functions," Staff Reports 257924, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    6. Gadson, Kenneth E. & Price, J. Michael & Salathe, Larry E., 1982. "Food And Agricultural Policy Simulator (Fapsim): Structural Equations And Variable Definitions," Staff Reports 276743, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Chen, Dean T. & Penson, John B. & Teboh, Jacob F., 1988. "The Implicit Revenue Function Approach to Farm Program Analysis," Staff Reports 257912, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    8. Grant, Warren R. & Beach, John & Lin, William, 1984. "Factors Affecting Supply, Demand, And Prices Of U.S. Rice," Staff Reports 277629, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Chembezi, Duncan M. & Womack, Abner W., 1992. "Regional Acreage Response For U.S. Corn And Wheat: The Effects Of Government Programs," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Bailey, Kenneth W. & Womack, Abner W., 1985. "Wheat Acreage Response: A Regional Econometric Investigation," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Schnitkey, Gary D. & Taylor, C. Robert & Barry, Peter J., 1989. "Evaluating Farmland Investments Considering Dynamic Stochastic Returns And Farmland Prices," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Haile, M.G. & Kalkuhl, M., 2014. "Volatility in the international food markets: implications for global agricultural supply and for market and price policy," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    13. Kanlaya J. Barr & Bruce A. Babcock & Miguel A. Carriquiry & Andre M. Nassar & Leila Harfuch, 2011. "Agricultural Land Elasticities in the United States and Brazil," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 449-462.
    14. Just, Richard E., 1992. "Discovering Microeconomic Relationships in Agriculture," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146530, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Umanath Malaiarasan & R. Paramasivam & K. Thomas Felix & S. J. Balaji, 2020. "Simultaneous equation model for Indian sugar sector," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 22(1), pages 113-141, June.
    16. Evans, R. Samuel & Kenyon, David E., 1974. "Regional Soybean Acreage Response Analysis and Projections for 1974," Miscellaneous Publications 327162, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Soule, Meredith J. & Nimon, R. Wesley & Mullarkey, Daniel J., 2001. "Risk Management And The Environment: Impacts At The Intensive And Extensive Margins," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20670, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Holt, Matthew T., 1989. "Risk, Rational Expectations, and Price Stabilization in the U.S. Corn Market," Staff Papers 200480, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    19. Wu, JunJie & Adams, Richard M., 2002. "Micro Versus Macro Acreage Response Models: Does Site-Specific Information Matter?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Rausser, Gordon C. & Lichtenberg, Erik & Lattimore, Ralph, 1981. "Developments in theory and empirical applications of endogenous governmental behavior," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt34j553k1, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance; Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea85:278618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aaea.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.