IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea82/279212.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PERCEPTIONS, ATTITUDES AND RISK: Overlooked Variables in Formulating Public Policy on Soil Conservation and Water Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Christensen, Lee A.
  • Miranowski, John A.

Abstract

The formulation of public goals for soil conservation and water quality improvement requires consideration of farmers' perception of the problems and their attitudes towards risk inherent in proposed options. Traditional budget analyses assume profit maximization objectives and ignore risk . attitudes. Risk attitudes are related to wealth position and thus influence receptivity to new technologies. The divergent interests of farmers and society regarding soil conservation and water quality are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Christensen, Lee A. & Miranowski, John A., 1982. "PERCEPTIONS, ATTITUDES AND RISK: Overlooked Variables in Formulating Public Policy on Soil Conservation and Water Quality," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279212, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea82:279212
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.279212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/279212/files/aaea-1982-086.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.279212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young, Douglas L., 1979. "Risk Preferences Of Agricultural Producers: Their Use In Extension And Research," 1979 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, Pullman, Washington 278203, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Douglas L. Young, 1979. "Risk Preferences of Agricultural Producers: Their Use in Extension and Research," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(5), pages 1063-1070.
    3. Steven T. Sonka, 1979. "Risk Management and Risk Preferences in Agriculture: Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(5), pages 1083-1084.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prato, Tony, 1987. "Economic Feasibility Of Conservation Tillage In The Palouse With Stochastic Erosion Rates And Yields," A.E. Research Series 305060, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    2. Libby, Lawrence W., 1982. "A Perspective That Strong Public Action Is Needed To Deal With The Problems of Soil Erosion," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279215, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Loïc Levi & Laure Latruffe & Aude Ridier, 2019. "Farm performance and investment decisions: evidence from the French (Brittany) dairy sector," Working Papers SMART 19-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    2. Erasmus, Barend & van Jaarsveld, Albert & van Zyl, Johan & Vink, Nick, 2000. "The effects of climate change on the farm sector in the Western Cape," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(4), pages 1-15, December.
    3. André, Francisco J. & Herrero, Inés & Riesgo, Laura, 2010. "A modified DEA model to estimate the importance of objectives with an application to agricultural economics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 371-382, October.
    4. van Zyl, J. & Groenewald, J. A., 1986. "A Comparison Of Certain Decision-Making Techniques Under Risk - An Empirical Investigation Of Maize Cultivar Selection," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 25(1), February.
    5. Marra, Michele & Pannell, David J. & Abadi Ghadim, Amir, 2003. "The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 75(2-3), pages 215-234.
    6. Basanta R. Dhungana & Peter L. Nuthall & Gilbert V. Nartea, 2004. "Measuring the economic inefficiency of Nepalese rice farms using data envelopment analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(2), pages 347-369, June.
    7. Messina, C. D. & Hansen, J. W. & Hall, A. J., 1999. "Land allocation conditioned on El Nino-Southern Oscillation phases in the Pampas of Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 197-212, June.
    8. Wilson, Paul N., 1984. "The Implementation of Convex Set: Discussion," Regional Research Projects >1984: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 25-28, 1984, New Orleans, Louisiana 307226, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    9. S. Martin & F. McLeay, 1998. "The Diversity of Farmers' Risk Management Strategies in a Deregulated New Zealand Environment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 218-233, June.
    10. Musser, Wesley N., 1994. "Progress In Risk Analysis In Regional Projects," 1994 Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses Risk, Technical Committee Meeting, March 24-26, 1994, Gulf Shores State Park, Alabama 271553, Regional Research Projects > S-232: Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk.
    11. Hauser, Robert J. & Eales, James S., 1985. "On the Measurement of Risks and Returns of Hedging with Options," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278561, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Elaine M. Liu, 2013. "Time to Change What to Sow: Risk Preferences and Technology Adoption Decisions of Cotton Farmers in China," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(4), pages 1386-1403, October.
    13. Gomez-Limon, Jose A. & Arriaza, Manuel & Riesgo, Laura, 2003. "An MCDM analysis of agricultural risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 569-585, December.
    14. Knowles, Glenn J., 1980. "Estimating Utility Functions," Risk Analysis in Agriculture: Research and Educational Developments, January 16-18, 1980, Tucson, Arizona 271570, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    15. Ahearn, Mary Clare & Collender, Robert N. & Diao, Xinshen & Harrington, David H. & Hoppe, Robert A. & Korb, Penelope J. & Makki, Shiva S. & Morehart, Mitchell J. & Roberts, Michael J. & Roe, Terry L. , 2004. "Decoupled Payments In A Changing Policy Setting," Agricultural Economic Reports 33981, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Robison, Lindon & Lev, Larry, 1983. "Distinguishing Between Initial and Final Outcome Variables to Predict Choices Under Risk or Why Woody Chip Went to the Air," Staff Paper Series 200693, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    17. Boggess, William G., 1987. "On Risk Modeling And Its Implications For Economic Analysis: A Discussion," Regional Research Projects > 1987: S-180 Annual Meeting, March 22-25, 1987, San Antonio, Texas 272334, Regional Research Projects > S-180: An Economic Analysis of Risk Management Strategies for Agricultural Production Firms.
    18. Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Helmers, Glenn A., 1980. "E,V Frontier Analysis Using Total And Random Variance As Measures Of Risk," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 279235, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Harris, Thomas R. & Mapp, Harry P. Jr., 1981. "Irrigation Scheduling In The Oklahoma Panhandle Using Stochastic Dominance Theory," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279304, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Breitenbach, Marthinus C. & Meyer, Nicolas G., 2000. "Modelling fertiliser use in the grain crop and oilseed sectors of South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(3), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea82:279212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aaea.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.