IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea81/279247.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Analysis of Research Expenditures for Selected Agricultural Commodities

Author

Listed:
  • Garren, Nathan M.
  • White, Fred C.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Garren, Nathan M. & White, Fred C., 1981. "An Analysis of Research Expenditures for Selected Agricultural Commodities," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279247, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea81:279247
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.279247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/279247/files/aaea-1981-008.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.279247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willis L. Peterson, 1969. "The Allocation of Research, Teaching, and Extension Personnel in U.S. Colleges of Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 51(1), pages 41-56.
    2. Maury Bredahl & Willis Peterson, 1976. "The Productivity and Allocation of Research: U.S. Agricultural Experiment Stations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(4_Part_1), pages 684-692.
    3. Bredahl, Maury E. & Peterson, Willis L., 1976. "The Productivity And Allocation Of Research: U.S. Agricultural Experiment Stations," Staff Papers 13698, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "The Production Function Approach to the Relationship Between Productivity Growth and R & D," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232791, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    2. Azam, Qazi Tauqir & Bloom, Erik A. & Evenson, Robert E., 1991. "Agricultural Research Productivity in Pakistan," Center Discussion Papers 321325, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    3. Narrod, Clare A., 2001. "Technology, Policies, And The Role Of The Private Sector In The Global Poultry Revolution," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14567, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. Lawrence Busch, 2008. "Nanotechnologies, food, and agriculture: next big thing or flash in the pan?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(2), pages 215-218, June.
    5. Narrod, Clare A. & Pray, Carl E. & Tiongco, Marites, 2008. "Technology transfer, policies, and the role of the private sector in the global poultry revolution:," IFPRI discussion papers 841, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Margolis, Robert M. & Kammen, Daniel M., 1999. "Evidence of under-investment in energy R&D in the United States and the impact of Federal policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(10), pages 575-584, October.
    7. Russell, N.P. & Thirtle, C.G., 1988. "Measuring the Contribution of Publicly Funded Research and Development Expenditure to Increasing UK Oilseed Rape Yields," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232796, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    8. Huffman, Wallace E. & Orazem, Peter, 1985. "The Market for New Ph.D. Agricultural Economists," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278607, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Peterson, Willis L. & Hayami, Yujiro, 1977. "Technical Change in Agriculture," A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 1: Traditional Fields of Agricultural Economics 1940s to 1970s,, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Norton, George W. & Davis, Jeffrey S., 1979. "Review Of Methods Used To Evaluate Returns To Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13520, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    11. de Gorter, Harry & Nielson, David J. & Rausser, Gordon C., 1990. "The political economy of productive and predatory policies: a case study from agriculture," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0q9495xv, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    12. Huffman, Wallace E. & Connor, Larry J., 1986. "A Perspective on the Market for Agricultural Economists: Background, Trends, and Issues," ISU General Staff Papers 198607010700001498, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Gregory M. Perry, 2023. "Cooperative extension, experiment station, and Land Grant Universities: Competitors or partners for state funding?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 947-969, June.
    14. Huffman, Wallace E. & Miranowski, John A., 1979. "An Economic Analysis Of Expenditures On State Experiment Station Research," ISU General Staff Papers 197908010700001095, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Runge, C. Ford, 2006. "Agricultural Economics: A Brief Intellectual History," Staff Papers 13649, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    16. Peterson, Willis & Hayami, Yujiro, 1977. "PART VII. Technical Change in Agriculture," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337219, january.
    17. Rajeswari S., 1995. "Agricultural research effort: Conceptual clarity and measurement," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 617-635, April.
    18. Ellingson, Dennis & Peterson, Willis L., 1981. "The Allocation Of Research Personnel: Administrators' Response To Expected Rates To Return," Staff Papers 14093, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    19. Peterson, Willis L., 1989. "Public Support Of Experiment Stations," Staff Papers 14229, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. E. Pasour & Marc Johnson, 1982. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research revisited," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 301-317, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea81:279247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aaea.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.