IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404768.html

Internal Control as a Sustainability Tool in Equine Business

Author

Listed:
  • Coskun, Ali
  • Suplicki, Emma

Abstract

The equine industry occupies a unique position in the intersection of agriculture, recreation, tourism, sports management, service delivery, and animal welfare. Equine businesses contribute significantly to rural economies and community development through several activities. Despite their economic and social importance, many equine enterprises, particularly small and mediumsized businesses, continue to operate with informal management practices, limited governance structures, and minimal internal control systems. Consequently, these organizations face a variety of financial, operational, compliance, safety, environmental, and reputational risks that may threaten long-term sustainability and organizational resilience. This conceptual study examines the application of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Internal Control Framework within small and medium-sized equine businesses. Drawing upon the literature on internal control, risk management, sustainability, and equine business management, the study identifies the major risks facing equine enterprises and develops a COSO-based internal control framework tailored to the industry's unique operational characteristics. The framework demonstrates how the five COSO components can be adapted to strengthen governance, improve decision-making, enhance compliance, safeguard assets, support horse welfare, and improve organizational performance. The paper also presents a practical implementation roadmap designed specifically for equine SMEs, providing guidance for integrating internal controls into routine operations without requiring complex organizational structures or significant additional resources. By embedding internal controls into everyday management processes, equine businesses can improve accountability, strengthen risk management, enhance stakeholder confidence, and better align operational activities with sustainability objectives. The study contributes to the limited literature on governance and internal control in the equine sector by extending the application of the COSO framework to an 3 underexplored industry. It positions internal control not merely as a compliance mechanism but as a strategic management tool that supports financial sustainability, operational effectiveness, horse welfare, stakeholder trust, and long-term organizational

Suggested Citation

  • Coskun, Ali & Suplicki, Emma, 2026. "Internal Control as a Sustainability Tool in Equine Business," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404768, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404768
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404768/files/195301_197010_115232_AAEA-InternalControl-Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puji Rahayu Setyaningsih & Nengzih Nengzih, 2020. "Internal Control, Organizational Culture, and Quality of Information Accounting to Prevent Fraud: Case Study From Indonesia's Agriculture Industry," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 316-328, July.
    2. Wunhong Su & Liuzhen Zhang & Chao Ge & Shuai Chen, 2022. "Association between Internal Control and Sustainability: A Literature Review Based on the SOX Act Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Pontrandolfi, A. & Capitanio, F. & Enjolras, G. & Goodwin, B., 2014. "Analysis of the factors used by farmers to manage risk. A case study on Italian farms," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L'Informatore Agrario, vol. 2014(4).
    4. Manuela Meraner & Robert Finger, 2019. "Risk perceptions, preferences and management strategies: evidence from a case study using German livestock farmers," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 110-135, January.
    5. Oana Daniela Lupoae & Riana Iren Radu & Mihaela-Carmen Muntean, 2022. "Capturing Entrepreneurial Opportunities in the Romanian Equine Sector: an Fs-Qca Approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 455-472, March.
    6. Murad Harasheh & Roberta Provasi, 2023. "A need for assurance: Do internal control systems integrate environmental, social, and governance factors?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 384-401, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vigani, Mauro & Khafagy, Amr & Berry, Robert, 2024. "Public spending for agricultural risk management: Land use, regional welfare and intra-subsidy substitution," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Janßen, Niklas, 2025. "Integrating sustainability in risk management and internal control systems: An empirical assessment of ESG reporting of German DAX40 firms," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(4), pages 858-875.
    3. Rega, Federico Giovanni & Russo, Simona & Salerno, Dario, 2025. "Disentangling the S and the G in the European banking industry: The role of climate risk and opportunity awareness," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
    4. Doan Nainggolan & Faizal Rahmanto Moeis & Mette Termansen, 2023. "Does risk preference influence farm level adaptation strategies? – Survey evidence from Denmark," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(7), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Nading Jr., Micheal & Etienne, Xiaoli & Trujillo-Barrera, Andres & Hatzenbuehler, Patrick & Wilder, Brett, 2024. "Factors Influencing Wheat Marketing Decisions: Insights from Idaho Focus Groups," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), September.
    6. Schaub, Sergei & Buchmann, Nina & Lüscher, Andreas & Finger, Robert, 2020. "Economic benefits from plant species diversity in intensively managed grasslands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Anupama Shantharaju & Md Aminul Islam & Jarrod M. Kath & Shahbaz Mushtaq & Arun Muniyappa & Lila Singh-Peterson, 2024. "Understanding Constraints and Enablers of Climate Risk Management Strategies: Evidence from Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Regional South India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Soriano, Bárbara & Garrido, Alberto & Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele & Accatino, Francesco & Antonioli, Federico & Krupin, Vitaliy & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Ollendorf, Franziska & Rommel, Jens & Spiege, 2023. "Actors and their roles for improving resilience of farming systems in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 98, pages 134-146.
    9. Huang, Jun & Han, Feifei & Li, Yun, 2023. "Government as major customer: The effects of government procurement on corporate environmental, social, and governance performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Coopmans, Isabeau & Wauters, Erwin & Spiegel, Alisa & Slijper, Thomas & Mathijs, Erik, 2025. "Exploring farmers' perceived resilience: A profiling of the Flemish farming system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    11. Jialin Yan & Haibo Hu & Yiruo Hu, 2024. "Does internal control improve enterprise environmental, social, and governance information disclosure? Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4980-4994, September.
    12. Li, Houjian & Cheng, Quanfeixue & Su, Mengying & Zhang, Kuan, 2025. "Empowering ESG: The pivotal influence of directors' and officers' liability insurance on corporate sustainability," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Monica Laura Zlati & Andrei Mirel Florea & Valentin Marian Antohi & Marius Sorin Dinca & Florentin Bercu & Costinela Fortea & Stanciu Silvius, 2023. "Financing Romanian Agricultural Cooperatives’ Investments for the 2023–2027 Horizon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, January.
    14. Amaka Nnaji & Nazmun Ratna & Alan Renwick & Wanglin Ma, 2023. "Risk perception, farmer−herder conflicts and production decisions: evidence from Nigeria," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(2), pages 683-716.
    15. Awlad Hosen Sagar & Md Abu Bakkar Siddik & Rubayet Hasan, 2020. "The Determinants of Risk-Sharing Strategies of Food-Retailers: A Study on Chittagong, Bangladesh," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(6), pages 337-347, December.
    16. Pardeshi, Shefali & Loughrey, Jason & O'Connor, Declan, . "Farm Investment and Adoption of Fixed Milk Price Contracts on Irish Dairy Farms," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 73(1).
    17. Hou, Lingling & Min, Shi & Huang, Qiuqiong & Huang, Jikun, 2023. "Farmers' perceptions of drought-severity and the impacts on ex-ante and ex-post adaptations to droughts: Evidence from maize farmers in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    18. Ach Maulidi & Jake Ansell, 2025. "CSR Fraud, Employee Green Behaviour, Green Capability: The Mediating Role of Person‐Organisation Fit," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6159-6180, September.
    19. Zhang, Yufei & Ye, Guanhong, 2025. "Judicial independence and corporate ESG performance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1789-1818.
    20. Huang, Yujie & Zhang, Guoqing & Chen, Xiaofeng & Du, Kerui, 2025. "From awareness to action: The role of ESG committees in driving corporate ambidextrous green innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.