IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404653.html

Toward a Sustainable Green Revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Impact of Farmer and Retailer Training for Fertilizer Microdosing on Rice Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Magezi, Eustadius
  • Nakano, Yuko
  • Tsujimoto, Yasuhiro

Abstract

Balancing environmental sustainability and agricultural productivity is a major global challenge. In particular, increasing crop productivity while reducing fertilizer inputs is central to achieving sustainable intensification among smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study evaluates the impact of P-dipping—an innovative technique for lowland rice production that enables farmers to achieve high yield with a small amount of fertilizer by placing a triple superphosphate (TSP) fertilizer near the root system at transplanting— on yield, income, and profit. Despite the technological advantages of P-dipping, its diffusion would require improvements in the fertilizer supply chain, as TSP fertilizer remains largely unavailable in rural markets. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to answer two primary questions: the effectiveness of P-dipping training for farmers on productivity, and whether providing training to both farmers and local fertilizer retailers would enhance the development of the TSP market. We compared three groups: a control group without training, farmers trained only, and farmers trained together with fertilizer retailers. We find that the adoption of P-dipping increased fertilizer use efficiency by 10.6 to 14.0 kilograms of paddy per kilogram of fertilizer applied. Furthermore, the adoption increased rice yield by 6.9 to 14.1 kilograms per are compared to non-P-dipping plots, resulting in higher income and profit even under an international fertilizer price surge that occurred in 2022 during the experimental period from 2021 to 2024. Our intention-to-treatment effects show that providing P-dipping training to both farmers and fertilizer retailers results in more sustained adoption than training farmers only. Retailers, however, stopped stocking TSP when project logistical support ended, resulting in a decline in adoption rates. These findings suggest that while P-dipping can significantly improve fertilizer use efficiency and productivity, its long-term success depends on viable supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Magezi, Eustadius & Nakano, Yuko & Tsujimoto, Yasuhiro, 2026. "Toward a Sustainable Green Revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Impact of Farmer and Retailer Training for Fertilizer Microdosing on Rice Productivity," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404653, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404653
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404653/files/177620_201092_115232_20260602_AAEA_Fertilizer_Microdosing_Manuscript_with_Appendix.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelson, Hope & Fairbairn, Anna & Ellison, Brenna & Maertens, Annemie & Manyong, Victor, 2021. "Misperceived quality: Fertilizer in Tanzania," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Tessa Bold & Kayuki C. Kaizzi & Jakob Svensson & David Yanagizawa-Drott, 2017. "Lemon Technologies and Adoption: Measurement, Theory and Evidence from Agricultural Markets in Uganda," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(3), pages 1055-1100.
    3. Manzoor H. Dar & Alain de Janvry & Kyle Emerick & Elisabeth Sadoulet & Eleanor Wiseman, 2024. "Private Input Suppliers as Information Agents for Technology Adoption in Agriculture," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 219-248, April.
    4. T.S. Jayne & Shahidur Rashid, 2013. "Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis of recent evidence," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(6), pages 547-562, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deutschmann, Joshua W. & Duru, Maya & Siegal, Kim & Tjernström, Emilia, 2025. "Relaxing multiple agricultural productivity constraints at scale," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Seth Asante & Kwaw Andam & Andrew M. Simons, 2024. "Perceptions, Quality, and Uncertainty in Ghanaian Fertilizer Markets," Fordham Economics Discussion Paper Series dp2024-02er:dp2024-02, Fordham University, Department of Economics.
    3. repec:ags:aaea22:335821 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Porteous, Obie, 2020. "Trade and agricultural technology adoption: Evidence from Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Bjorn Van Campenhout & Anusha De, 2023. "Gendered perceptions in maize supply chains: Evidence from Uganda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    6. Puerto, Sergio, 2023. "Agriculture, innovation, and development: What happens when new technology is not good enough?," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335821, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Hope Michelson, 2025. "Navigating the Measurement Frontier: New Insights Into Small Farm Realities," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(3), pages 526-542, May.
    8. Nicholas Tyack & Martina Bozzola & Tim Swanson & Helena Ting, 2026. "Certification and Credibility: Do Seed Certification Systems in Uganda Help Signal Quality to Farmers?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(1), pages 48-56, February.
    9. Wouter Zant, 2022. "Two Birds with One Stone: Technology Adoption and Market Participation through Protection against Crop Failure," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 22-091/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Barriga, Alicia & Fiala, Nathan, 2020. "The supply chain for seed in Uganda: Where does it go wrong?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Ray, Srabashi, 2025. "Joint agricultural input use and food security: evidence from Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Oreoluwa Ola & Luisa Menapace, 2020. "Revisiting constraints to smallholder participation in high‐value markets: A best‐worst scaling approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(4), pages 595-608, July.
    13. Jamleck Osiemo & Francesco Cecchi & Erwin Bulte & Caroline Mwongera, 2026. "Experiential learning, narrative‐based learning, and insurance adoption: Experimental evidence from Kenya," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 108(1), pages 232-253, January.
    14. Paola Mallia, 2022. "You reap what (you think) you sow? Evidence on farmers’behavioral adjustments in the case of correct crop varietal identification," PSE Working Papers hal-03597332, HAL.
    15. Apurba Shee & Carlo Azzarri & Beliyou Haile, 2019. "Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Agricultural Technologies: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Beg, Sabrin & Islam, Mahnaz & Rahman, Khandker Wahedur, 2024. "Information and behavior: Evidence from fertilizer quantity recommendations in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Abay, Kibrom A. & Chamberlin, Jordan & Chivenge, Pauline & Spielman, David J., 2025. "Fertilizer, soil health, and economic shocks: A synthesis of recent evidence," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Kazushi Takahashi & Rie Muraoka & Keijiro Otsuka, 2020. "Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: A review of the recent literature," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 31-45, January.
    19. Ruth Hill & Carolina Mejia-Mantilla & Kathryn Vasilaky, 2021. "Is the Price Right? Returns to Input Adoption in Uganda," Working Papers 2105, California Polytechnic State University, Department of Economics.
    20. Chen, Juhui & Bai, Junfei & Lu, Xi & Ma, Yinghui & Zhou, Meng, 2026. "Audiovisual pesticide label: A digital expert to promote accurate pesticide use," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    21. Groote, Hugo De & Gharib, Mariam & Olson, Mike, 2021. "Economic Analysis of 50% Non-Pollinating (FNP) Maize Varieties in Africa," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315414, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.