IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404326.html

Optimizing Risk and Return for Commodity Producers Using Modern Portfolio Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Elliott, Matthew

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the application of Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) to commodity risk management, contrasting it with traditional technical indicator-based hedging strategies. While MPT approaches have been extensively utilized in the investment management industry for decades to optimize institutional portfolios and mutual funds, these sophisticated methods have not been widely applied by practitioners for optimizing hedges to commodity production. Using actual market data from 2018-2025, we analyze the performance of four distinct strategies: physical position holding, maximum Sharpe ratio optimization, minimum variance optimization, and technical Bollinger Band breakout signals for optimal risk management in commodity production. Our empirical analysis of a representative agricultural producer portfolio ($1.1M in corn and soybeans) reveals that the minimum variance strategy delivers superior risk-adjusted returns with a Sharpe ratio of 0.519, compared to technical strategies averaging -0.094. The study provides quantitative evidence that MPT-based approaches can significantly enhance commodity producers' risk management while reducing portfolio volatility by up to 47%.

Suggested Citation

  • Elliott, Matthew, 2026. "Optimizing Risk and Return for Commodity Producers Using Modern Portfolio Theory," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404326, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404326
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404326/files/177452_194960_115232_Commodity_Risk_Management_Paper_Final_3_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2003. "Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 603-621, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao Zhao & Olivier Ledoit & Hui Jiang, 2019. "Risk reduction and efficiency increase in large portfolios: leverage and shrinkage," ECON - Working Papers 328, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jan 2020.
    2. Hannart, Alexis & Naveau, Philippe, 2014. "Estimating high dimensional covariance matrices: A new look at the Gaussian conjugate framework," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 149-162.
    3. Cui, Xueting & Zhu, Shushang & Sun, Xiaoling & Li, Duan, 2013. "Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 2124-2139.
    4. Weilong Liu & Yanchu Liu, 2025. "Covariance Matrix Estimation for Positively Correlated Assets," Papers 2507.01545, arXiv.org.
    5. Sourish Das & Aritra Halder & Dipak K. Dey, 2017. "Regularizing Portfolio Risk Analysis: A Bayesian Approach," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 865-889, September.
    6. Santos, André A.P. & Nogales, Francisco J. & Ruiz, Esther & Dijk, Dick Van, 2012. "Optimal portfolios with minimum capital requirements," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1928-1942.
    7. Georges Hübner, 2005. "The Generalized Treynor Ratio," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 9(3), pages 415-435.
    8. Ding, Wenliang & Shu, Lianjie & Gu, Xinhua, 2023. "A robust Glasso approach to portfolio selection in high dimensions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 22-37.
    9. Mishra, Anil V., 2016. "Foreign bias in Australian-domiciled mutual fund holdings," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 101-123.
    10. Nathan Lassance & Alberto Martín-Utrera & Majeed Simaan, 2024. "The Risk of Expected Utility Under Parameter Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7644-7663, November.
    11. Liusha Yang & Romain Couillet & Matthew R. McKay, 2015. "A Robust Statistics Approach to Minimum Variance Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1503.08013, arXiv.org.
    12. Zichuan Guo & Mihai Cucuringu & Alexander Y. Shestopaloff, 2025. "Generalized Factor Neural Network Model for High-dimensional Regression," Papers 2502.11310, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    13. Papp, Gábor & Caccioli, Fabio & Kondor, Imre, 2019. "Bias-variance trade-off in portfolio optimization under expected shortfall with ℓ 2 regularization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100294, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Torben G. Andersen & Tim Bollerslev & Peter Christoffersen & Francis X. Diebold, 2007. "Practical Volatility and Correlation Modeling for Financial Market Risk Management," NBER Chapters, in: The Risks of Financial Institutions, pages 513-544, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Andries C. van Vlodrop & Andre (A.) Lucas, 2018. "Estimation Risk and Shrinkage in Vast-Dimensional Fundamental Factor Models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-099/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. Vaughn Gambeta & Roy Kwon, 2020. "Risk Return Trade-Off in Relaxed Risk Parity Portfolio Optimization," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-28, October.
    17. Fan, Jianqing & Liao, Yuan & Shi, Xiaofeng, 2015. "Risks of large portfolios," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 367-387.
    18. Bernardini, Emmanuela & Cubadda, Gianluca, 2015. "Macroeconomic forecasting and structural analysis through regularized reduced-rank regression," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 682-691.
    19. Seyoung Park & Eun Ryung Lee & Sungchul Lee & Geonwoo Kim, 2019. "Dantzig Type Optimization Method with Applications to Portfolio Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.