IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/361208.html

Heterogeneity in Public’s Preferences for Wind and Solar Farms Development in Northeast US: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Dang, Ruirui
  • Badole, Sachin B.
  • Towe, Charles
  • Heintzelman, Martin D.

Abstract

This study uses data from a discrete choice experiment in the northeastern U.S. to examine resident preferences for siting wind and solar energy projects. It explores the impacts of landscape, agricultural production, cooperation, and financial compensation to stakeholders. Findings suggest that households are more favorable to renewable energy development if subsidies are provided on their electricity bills. Key factors influencing decisions include visual impact, proximity, and community engagement. Payments to landowners and communities also play a significant role in shaping local support and acceptance. Our study further reveals considerable heterogeneity in preferences. Respondents demonstrated overall support for wind or solar farm development in their local community, though preferences differed among various demographic and attitudinal groups, with the average respondent willing to be compensated $88 less in their base electric bill.

Suggested Citation

  • Dang, Ruirui & Badole, Sachin B. & Towe, Charles & Heintzelman, Martin D., 2025. "Heterogeneity in Public’s Preferences for Wind and Solar Farms Development in Northeast US: A Discrete Choice Experiment," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361208, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361208
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.361208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/361208/files/104567_104579_105300_Heterogeneity_in_Publics_Preferences_for_Wind_and_Solar_Farms_Development_in_Northeast_US-_A_Discrete_Choice_Experiment.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.361208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerr, Sandy & Johnson, Kate & Weir, Stephanie, 2017. "Understanding community benefit payments from renewable energy development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 202-211.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryszard Kata & Rafał Pitera, 2023. "Local Authority Investments in the Field of Energy Transition and Their Determinants (on the Example of South-Eastern Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Wang, Jianjun & Liu, Fang & Li, Li & Zhang, Jian, 2022. "More than innovativeness: Comparing residents’ motivations for participating renewable energy communities in different innovation segments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 552-563.
    3. Määttä, Senni, 2024. "Community-developer collaboration and voluntary community benefits in Scotland: Are community benefits a gift or compensation?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Johansen, Katinka, 2021. "Blowing in the wind: A brief history of wind energy and wind power technologies in Denmark," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. le Maitre, Julia & Ryan, Geraldine & Power, Bernadette & O'Connor, Ellen, 2023. "Empowering onshore wind energy: A national choice experiment on financial benefits and citizen participation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    6. Meier, Jan-Niklas & Lehmann, Paul, 2020. "Optimal federal co-regulation of renewable energy deployment," UFZ Discussion Papers 8/2020, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    7. Elie, Luc & Granier, Caroline & Rigot, Sandra, 2021. "The different types of renewable energy finance: A Bibliometric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Segura, E. & Morales, R. & Somolinos, J.A., 2018. "A strategic analysis of tidal current energy conversion systems in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 527-551.
    9. Knoblauch, Theresa A.K. & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Stauffacher, Michael, 2019. "Siting deep geothermal energy: Acceptance of various risk and benefit scenarios in a Swiss-German cross-national study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 807-816.
    10. Shoeib, Eman Ahmed Hamed & Hamin Infield, Elisabeth & Renski, Henry C., 2021. "Measuring the impacts of wind energy projects on U.S. rural counties’ community services and cost of living," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Hvelplund, Frede & Djørup, Søren, 2019. "Consumer ownership, natural monopolies and transition to 100% renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 440-449.
    12. Johansen, K. & Emborg, J., 2018. "Wind farm acceptance for sale? Evidence from the Danish wind farm co-ownership scheme," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 413-422.
    13. Woo, JongRoul & Chung, Sungsam & Lee, Chul-Yong & Huh, Sung-Yoon, 2019. "Willingness to participate in community-based renewable energy projects: A contingent valuation study in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 643-652.
    14. Knauf, Jakob & le Maitre, Julia, 2023. "A matter of acceptability? Understanding citizen investment schemes in the context of onshore wind farm development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Gebreslassie, Mulualem G., 2020. "Public perception and policy implications towards the development of new wind farms in Ethiopia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    16. Ryszard Kata & Magdalena Cyrek & Małgorzata Wosiek, 2024. "The Significance of the Financial Situation of Local Government Units for Their Energy Transition Activities: The Case of the Podkarpackie Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Robert Wade & Geraint Ellis, 2022. "Reclaiming the Windy Commons: Landownership, Wind Rights, and the Assetization of Renewable Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, May.
    18. Ramirez, Jacobo & Angelino Velázquez, Diego & Vélez-Zapata, Claudia, 2022. "The potential role of peace, justice, and strong institutions in Colombia's areas of limited statehood for energy diversification towards governance in energy democracy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    19. Leer Jørgensen, Marie & Anker, Helle Tegner & Lassen, Jesper, 2020. "Distributive fairness and local acceptance of wind turbines: The role of compensation schemes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Clausen, Laura Tolnov & Rudolph, David, 2020. "Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: Synergies and mismatches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.