IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/360738.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tailoring Conservation Policy: Farmer Typologies and Differential Barrier Perceptions in Drainage Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Chakravorty, Rwit
  • Feng, Hongli
  • Hennessy, David A.

Abstract

This study examines barriers to conservation drainage adoption despite cost-share incentives in the U.S. Midwest. Using survey data from 530 farm operators across the Corn Belt, we employ probit model, boosted regression trees, and latent class analysis to analyze factors influencing farmer non-acceptance of 50% cost-share programs for controlled drainage, saturated buffers, and wetland restoration. Results reveal substantial non-acceptance rates of 54.5-68.1% across practices. Probit models show that neighbor adoption reduces non-acceptance probability by 12.3 percentage points for controlled drainage, while higher liability-to-asset ratios consistently increase responsiveness to financial incentives across all practices. Machine learning analysis reveals that climate variables and geographic location are heavily influential in adoption decisions. Latent class analysis identifies four distinct farmer types, suggesting that uniform conservation programs are inadequate for addressing farmer heterogeneity. Understanding farmer heterogeneity and designing targeted interventions will be key to achieving widespread adoption of sustainable drainage practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakravorty, Rwit & Feng, Hongli & Hennessy, David A., 2025. "Tailoring Conservation Policy: Farmer Typologies and Differential Barrier Perceptions in Drainage Practices," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360738, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360738
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.360738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360738/files/75187_103808_105300_Chapter3_v1_2025_05_23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.360738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.