IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae23/365864.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Accelerated exiting of captured commercial producers and the structural impact thereof: An agent-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Cloete, Kandas
  • Möhring, Anke
  • Zantsi, Siphe

Abstract

The government of South Africa is trying to transform the country’s commercial agriculture through land redistribution programmes to a more inclusive and racially equitable sector. However, the redistribution efforts have not been very successful and radical approaches, such as expropriating land without compensation, have been approved partially, although the potential harm of this approach is known. This paper explores the prospects of commercial producers who would be willing to exit voluntarily in the near future to make land available for redistribution. In addition, it also considers what factors are restricting the acceleration of this rate of exit from a land-supply perspective with respect to barriers to exit. The prospect of structural change from such acceleration is also explored, using three scenarios. An agent-based mathematical model is used to implement the three scenarios. The model is constructed from a dataset of 450 commercial producers across South Africa. The results suggest that a reasonable amount of arable land could be available for redistribution, with modest structural change regarding animal production, despite drastic alterations in veld. These results provide some guidelines that for an alternative to the harmful and radical approach of land expropriation currently being considered. All potential exiting commercial producers have common reasons for doing so, which could be used to initialise a positively inclined, structured discussion on land supply as a foundation for redistribution, which, to a large extent, is approached from a land demand perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Cloete, Kandas & Möhring, Anke & Zantsi, Siphe, 2023. "Accelerated exiting of captured commercial producers and the structural impact thereof: An agent-based approach," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365864, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:365864
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.365864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/365864/files/377.%20Exit%20in%20South%20Africa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.365864?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katchova, Ani L. & Ahearn, Mary Clare, 2014. "Farmland Ownership and Leasing: Implications for Young and Beginning Farmers," Staff Papers 184725, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    2. Annalisa Ferrando & Alessandro Ruggieri, 2018. "Financial constraints and productivity: Evidence from euro area companies," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 257-282, July.
    3. Johann Kirsten & Charles Machethe & Talent Ndlovu & Pascalina Lubambo, 2016. "Performance of land reform projects in the North West province of South Africa: Changes over time and possible causes," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 442-458, July.
    4. Kandas Cloete & Stefan Mann & Marion Delport, 2022. "Confident or captured? Commercial producers in South Africa," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(7), pages 976-992, March.
    5. Chen, Hongyu & Weersink, Alfons & Beaulieu, Martin & Lee, Yu Na & Nagelschmitz, Katrin, "undated". "A Historical Review of Changes in Farm Size in Canada," Working Papers 283563, University of Guelph, Institute for the Advanced Study of Food and Agricultural Policy.
    6. Jean-Paul Chavas, 1994. "Production and Investment Decisions Under Sunk Cost and Temporal Uncertainty," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(1), pages 114-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cloete, Kandas & Möhring, Anke & Zantsi, Siphe, 2023. "Modelling the exiting of South African producers from commercial agricultural production – an agent-based model," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 62(3-4), December.
    2. Wang, Maolin & Lin, Huiting & Huang, Yehua & Lu, Huiyan, 2023. "Poverty alleviation and firm productivity: Evidence from China's minimum wage system," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Roberto Ganau & Kristina Maslauskaite & Monica Brezzi, 2021. "Credit constraints, labor productivity, and the role of regional institutions: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Europe," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 299-328, March.
    4. Verschoor, Aart-Jan & Gandidzanwa, Colleta & Newby, Terence & Collett, Anneliza & Venter, Sonja, 2023. "Proposing a farm assessment toolkit: evaluating a South African land reform case study," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 62(3-4), December.
    5. Anna M. Ferragina & Fernanda Mazzotta & Khalid Sekkat, 2016. "Financial constraints and productivity growth across the size spectrum: microeconomic evidence from Morocco," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 361-381, December.
    6. Loïc Levi & Laure Latruffe & Aude Ridier, 2019. "Farm performance and investment decisions: evidence from the French (Brittany) dairy sector," Working Papers SMART 19-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    7. Sasan Bakhtiari & Robert Breunig & Lisa Magnani & Jacquelyn Zhang, 2020. "Financial Constraints and Small and Medium Enterprises: A Review," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 96(315), pages 506-523, December.
    8. Qi‐an Chen & Shuxiang Tang & Yuan Xu, 2022. "Do government subsidies and financing constraints play a dominant role in the effect of state ownership on corporate innovation? Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3698-3714, December.
    9. Francesco Manaresi & Nicola Pierri, 2024. "The Asymmetric Effect of Credit Supply on Firm‐Level Productivity Growth," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(4), pages 677-704, June.
    10. Barham, Bradford L. & Chavas, Jean-Paul & Klemme, Richard M., 1994. "Low Capital Dairy Strategies In Wisconsin: Lessons From A New Approach To Measuring Profitability," Staff Papers 12631, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Gossé Jean-Baptiste & Hermet Émilie & Mourjane Anass & Dufouleur Mathilde, 2020. "Developing the Capital Markets Union to mobilise savings and stimulate investment in Europe [Développer l’Union des marchés de capitaux pour mobiliser l’épargne et stimuler l’investissement en Euro," Bulletin de la Banque de France, Banque de France, issue 231.
    12. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu, 2023. "Total factor productivity and tax avoidance: An asymmetric micro-data analysis for European oil and gas companies," Working Papers hal-04163245, HAL.
    13. Heikki Lehtonen & Reimund Rötter & Taru Palosuo & Tapio Salo & Janne Helin & Yulia Pavlova & Helena Kahiluoto, 2010. "A Modelling Framework for Assessing Adaptive Management Options of Finnish Agrifood Systems to Climate Change," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(2), pages 1-3, May.
    14. Wheatley, W. Parker & Liu, Donald J. & del Ninno, Carlo, 2001. "Empirical Analysis Of Hysteresis In Rural Labor Markets In A Developing Country: The Case Of Bangladesh," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20594, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Colleta Gandidzanwa & Aart Jan Verschoor & Thabo Sacolo, 2021. "Evaluating Factors Affecting Performance of Land Reform Beneficiaries in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Levine, Oliver & Warusawitharana, Missaka, 2021. "Finance and productivity growth: Firm-level evidence," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 91-107.
    17. Robert Breunig & Diana Hourani & Sasan Bakhtiari & Elisabetta Magnani, 2020. "Do financial constraints affect the composition of workers of a firm?," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 23(1), pages 79-97.
    18. Li, Yifan & Miao, Zhuang & Tuuli, Maxwell, 2022. "Exchange rate volatility and import of intermediate inputs: Evidence from Chinese firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 120-134.
    19. Md Samsul Alam & Md Shahidul Islam & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad & Shazia Bilal, 2021. "Rapid rise of life expectancy in Bangladesh: Does financial development matter?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 4918-4931, October.
    20. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu & Camélia Turcu, 2022. "Productivity, financial performance, and corporate governance: evidence from Romanian R&D firms," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(51), pages 5956-5975, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:365864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.