IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae23/365846.html

A Demonstration of the Efficiency of Agricultural Production in the CEMAC Zone

Author

Listed:
  • Elie, Ngasseu Noupie
  • Beauclair, Atadouanla Segning
  • Jean, Tchitchoua

Abstract

The principal objective of this paper, consist to evaluate the level of efficiency of agricultural production (that is, Earth-based) of the Central African Economic and Monetary State (CEMAC). More specifically, this research is focused on assessing the level of the technical efficiency of agricultural Production in the six CEMAC countries of agricultural factors (consisting of Technical efficiency and technological efficiency). The use of a non-parametric model (through the “Malmquist” Productivity Index method) on data of the World Development indicator (WDI 2021) from the six countries of the sub-region over the period 1999-2020. The results from the study show that not only the availability of land, labour, tractors, fertilizers and human capital leads to technical inefficiency (loss of 3% over the study period) but also to technological efficiency (gain of 2.5% of the study period) of agricultural production. However, in the entire CEMAC Sub-Region, there is a loss of agricultural productivity of the order 0.5%, mainly due to Chad, which has a total loss of agricultural productivity of 19.7%

Suggested Citation

  • Elie, Ngasseu Noupie & Beauclair, Atadouanla Segning & Jean, Tchitchoua, 2023. "A Demonstration of the Efficiency of Agricultural Production in the CEMAC Zone," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 365846, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:365846
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.365846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/365846/files/French%207.%20Agriculture%20in%20CEMAC.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.365846?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    2. Aigner, Dennis & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Peter, 1977. "Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 21-37, July.
    3. Atkinson, Scott E & Cornwell, Christopher, 1994. "Estimation of Output and Input Technical Efficiency Using a Flexible Form and Panel Data," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 35(1), pages 245-255, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madau, Fabio A., 2012. "Technical and scale efficiency in the Italian Citrus Farming: A comparison between Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) and Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA) Models," MPRA Paper 41403, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Luis R. Murillo‐Zamorano, 2004. "Economic Efficiency and Frontier Techniques," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 33-77, February.
    3. Nsiri, Nour & Kleftodimos, Georgios & Drogué, Sophie, 2025. "Efficiency of agricultural systems in Morocco: A meta-frontier analysis of resource use and water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    4. António Afonso & Ana Patricia Montes & José M. Domínguez, 2024. "Measuring Tax Burden Efficiency in OECD Countries: An International Comparison," CESifo Working Paper Series 11333, CESifo.
    5. Barros, Carlos Pestana & Williams, Jonathan, 2013. "The random parameters stochastic frontier cost function and the effectiveness of public policy: Evidence from bank restructuring in Mexico," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 98-108.
    6. An, Duong Hoai, 2022. "Performance of universities in Vietnam," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Jagjeevan Kanoujiya & Shailesh Rastogi, 2024. "Nexus between efficiency and financial distress of listed firms in India: a comparative study using frontier techniques," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(2), pages 835-866, June.
    8. Danish Ahmed SIDDIQUI & Qazi Masood AHMED, 2019. "Are institutions a crucial determinant of cross country economic efficiency? A two-stage double bootstrap data envelopment analysis," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(618), S), pages 89-114, Spring.
    9. Banker, Rajiv & Natarajan, Ram & Zhang, Daqun, 2019. "Two-stage estimation of the impact of contextual variables in stochastic frontier production function models using Data Envelopment Analysis: Second stage OLS versus bootstrap approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 368-384.
    10. Johnes, Jill, 2006. "Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 273-288, June.
    11. Shuji Yao & Zhongwei Han & Dan Luo, 2010. "Performance of the Chinese Insurance Industry under Economic Reforms," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12788, June.
    12. Noel Uri, 2003. "The Effect of Incentive Regulation in Telecommunications in the United States," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 169-191, May.
    13. Goddard, John & Molyneux, Philip & Williams, Jonathan, 2014. "Dealing with cross-firm heterogeneity in bank efficiency estimates: Some evidence from Latin America," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 130-142.
    14. Badunenko, Oleg & Galeotti, Marzio & Hunt, Lester C., "undated". "Better to grow or better to improve? Measuring environmental efficiency in OECD countries with a Stochastic Environmental Kuznets Frontier," FEEM Working Papers 316226, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    15. Idiano D’Adamo & Cinzia Daraio & Simone Di Leo & Léopold Simar, 2024. "A Flexible and Sustainable Analysis of Waste Efficiency at the European Level," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(4), pages 881-894, December.
    16. Doumpos, Michael & Hasan, Iftekhar & Pasiouras, Fotios, 2017. "Bank overall financial strength: Islamic versus conventional banks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 513-523.
    17. J. Cummins & Hongmin Zi, 1998. "Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods: An Application to the U.S. Life Insurance Industry," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 131-152, October.
    18. Raul Moragues & Juan Aparicio & Miriam Esteve, 2023. "Ranking the Importance of Variables in a Nonparametric Frontier Analysis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Ahn, Heinz & Clermont, Marcel & Langner, Julia, 2023. "Comparative performance analysis of frontier-based efficiency measurement methods – A Monte Carlo simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 294-312.
    20. Frenda, Antonio & Sepe, Enrica & Scippacercola, Sergio, 2021. "Efficiency analysis of social protection expenditure in the Italian Regions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:365846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.