IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aeg/wpaper/2011-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The implementor/adversarial algorithm for cyclic and robust scheduling problems in health-care

Author

Listed:
  • Matias Holte

    (SINTEF ICT, Norway Dept. of Applied Mathematics)

  • Carlo Mannino

    (Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica "Antonio Ruberti" Sapienza, Universita' di Roma)

Abstract

A general problem in health-care consists in allocating some scarce medical resource, such as operating rooms or medical staff, to medical specialties in order to keep the queue of patients as short as possible. A major difficulty stems from the fact that such an allocation must be established several months in advance, whereas the exact number of patients for each specialty is an uncertain parameter. Another problem arises for cyclic schedules, where the allocation is defined over a short period, e.g. a week, and then repeated during the time horizon. Even if the demand is perfectly known in advance, the number of patients may vary from week to week. We model both the uncertain and the cyclic allocation problem as adjustable robust scheduling problems. We develop a row and column generation algorithm to solve this problem: this turns out to be the implementor/adversarial algorithm for robust optimization recently introduced by Bienstock for portfolio selection. We apply our general model to compute master surgery schedules for a real-life instance from a large hospital in Oslo.

Suggested Citation

  • Matias Holte & Carlo Mannino, 2011. "The implementor/adversarial algorithm for cyclic and robust scheduling problems in health-care," DIS Technical Reports 2011-03, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
  • Handle: RePEc:aeg:wpaper:2011-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~bibdis/RePEc/aeg/2011-03.pdf
    File Function: First version 2011
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belien, Jeroen & Demeulemeester, Erik, 2007. "Building cyclic master surgery schedules with leveled resulting bed occupancy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1185-1204, January.
    2. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    3. Hans, Erwin & Wullink, Gerhard & van Houdenhoven, Mark & Kazemier, Geert, 2008. "Robust surgery loading," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1038-1050, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van den Broek d’Obrenan, Anne & Ridder, Ad & Roubos, Dennis & Stougie, Leen, 2020. "Minimizing bed occupancy variance by scheduling patients under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 336-349.
    2. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    3. Cappanera, Paola & Visintin, Filippo & Banditori, Carlo, 2014. "Comparing resource balancing criteria in master surgical scheduling: A combined optimisation-simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 179-196.
    4. Narges Hosseini & Kevin Taaffe, 2015. "Allocating operating room block time using historical caseload variability," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 419-430, December.
    5. Shuwan Zhu & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang & Jun Pei & Panos M. Pardalos, 2019. "Operating room planning and surgical case scheduling: a review of literature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 757-805, April.
    6. Thomas Schneider, A.J. & Theresia van Essen, J. & Carlier, Mijke & Hans, Erwin W., 2020. "Scheduling surgery groups considering multiple downstream resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 741-752.
    7. Vijayakumar, Bharathwaj & Parikh, Pratik J. & Scott, Rosalyn & Barnes, April & Gallimore, Jennie, 2013. "A dual bin-packing approach to scheduling surgical cases at a publicly-funded hospital," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 583-591.
    8. Sara Ceschia & Andrea Schaerf, 2016. "Dynamic patient admission scheduling with operating room constraints, flexible horizons, and patient delays," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 377-389, August.
    9. Javiera Barrera & Rodrigo A. Carrasco & Susana Mondschein & Gianpiero Canessa & David Rojas-Zalazar, 2020. "Operating room scheduling under waiting time constraints: the Chilean GES plan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 501-527, March.
    10. Filippo Visintin & Paola Cappanera & Carlo Banditori, 2016. "Evaluating the impact of flexible practices on the master surgical scheduling process: an empirical analysis," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 182-205, June.
    11. Holte, Matias & Mannino, Carlo, 2013. "The implementor/adversary algorithm for the cyclic and robust scheduling problem in health-care," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 551-559.
    12. Penn, M.L. & Potts, C.N. & Harper, P.R., 2017. "Multiple criteria mixed-integer programming for incorporating multiple factors into the development of master operating theatre timetables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 194-206.
    13. Anjomshoa, Hamideh & Dumitrescu, Irina & Lustig, Irvin & Smith, Olivia J., 2018. "An exact approach for tactical planning and patient selection for elective surgeries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 728-739.
    14. Jeroen Oostrum & Eelco Bredenhoff & Erwin Hans, 2010. "Suitability and managerial implications of a Master Surgical Scheduling approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 91-104, July.
    15. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Sepehr Nemati & Oleg V. Shylo & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Andrew J. Schaefer, 2016. "The Surgical Patient Routing Problem: A Central Planner Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 657-673, November.
    17. repec:ipg:wpaper:14 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2016. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," Discussion Papers of Business and Economics 4/2016, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Business and Economics.
    19. Gréanne Leeftink & Erwin W. Hans, 2018. "Case mix classification and a benchmark set for surgery scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 17-33, February.
    20. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    21. Range, Troels Martin & Kozlowski, Dawid & Petersen, Niels Chr., 2019. "Dynamic job assignment: A column generation approach with an application to surgery allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 78-93.
    22. Siqueira, Cecília L. & Arruda, Edilson F. & Bahiense, Laura & Bahr, Germana L. & Motta, Geraldo R., 2018. "Long-term integrated surgery room optimization and recovery ward planning, with a case study in the Brazilian National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 870-883.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health-care optimization; Master surgery scheduling; Robust optimization; Mixed-integer programming;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aeg:wpaper:2011-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dirosit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonietta Angelica Zucconi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dirosit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.