IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/tiim13/s1_127-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Product Portfolio Management: Current Challenges and Preconditions

Author

Listed:
  • Arto Tolonen

    (University of Oulu, Finland)

  • Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera

    (University of Oulu, Finland)

  • Harri Haapasalo

    (University of Oulu, Finland)

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of this study is to clarify the current challenges relating to Product Portfolio Management (PPM). Also, any preconditions for active PPM in terms of concepts, processes, tools, KPIs and governance models are analyzed. Design/methodology/approach: Current state analysis of product portfolio management practices are based on both, a thorough literature review and several case companies. Case companies represent many business areas such as HW, SW, services and even combinations of them, solution providers. Findings: The role of PPM is not to be a follower of activities caused by customers, product development, sales, deliver and care organizations, and processes. The primary role of PPM should be active management of current product portfolio, over product life cycle, instead of merely focusing on new product development. Product portfolio management as a concept and process is not that well understood and in place like other business processes. Research limitations: The limitations of this study include analyzing a limited number of companies. Also, the experience of the analyzed companies varies from only few years to a relatively long history. Practical implications: The implications of this study include the potential preconditions of clarifying the role of product portfolio management. The findings can aid business managers in understanding the PPM as an entity that has a role in managing products and portfolios based on strategic and financial targets over product lifecycles. Originality/value: This study approaches PPM from a more comprehensive viewpoint than the traditional NPD focused PPM that is mainly covered by the existing literature. A company’s future portfolio is seen as a sum of the existing product portfolio and the products created via NPD. Existing product portfolio is also expanded by possible products introduced by joint ventures. This article questions whether PPM ought to be considered equally as a business process, similarly as product, sales, delivery and care processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Arto Tolonen & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera & Harri Haapasalo, 2013. "Product Portfolio Management: Current Challenges and Preconditions," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    • Handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s1_127-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S1_127-144.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thonemann, Ulrich W. & Bradley, James R., 2002. "The effect of product variety on supply-chain performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 548-569, December.
    2. Julie Ward & Bin Zhang & Shailendra Jain & Chris Fry & Thomas Olavson & Holger Mishal & Jason Amaral & Dirk Beyer & Ann Brecht & Brian Cargille & Russ Chadinha & Kathy Chou & Gavin DeNyse & Qi Feng & , 2010. "HP Transforms Product Portfolio Management with Operations Research," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 17-32, February.
    3. Taylor Randall & Karl Ulrich, 2001. "Product Variety, Supply Chain Structure, and Firm Performance: Analysis of the U.S. Bicycle Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(12), pages 1588-1604, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Tiaojun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2014. "Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 114-124.
    2. Lyons, Andrew Charles & Um, Juneho & Sharifi, Hossein, 2020. "Product variety, customisation and business process performance: A mixed-methods approach to understanding their relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Ayd{i}n Alptekinou{g}lu & Charles J. Corbett, 2008. "Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 204-217, August.
    4. Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Lorin M. Hitt, 2012. "Information Technology and Trademarks: Implications for Product Variety," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1211-1226, June.
    5. Tolonen, Arto & Shahmarichatghieh, Marzieh & Harkonen, Janne & Haapasalo, Harri, 2015. "Product portfolio management – Targets and key performance indicators for product portfolio renewal over life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 468-477.
    6. Shanshan Guo & H. Sebastian Heese, 2017. "Product variety and distribution channel structure," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3392-3410, June.
    7. Xiao, Tiaojun & Xu, Tiantian, 2014. "Pricing and product line strategy in a supply chain with risk-averse players," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 305-315.
    8. Um, Juneho & Lyons, Andrew & Lam, Hugo K.S. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Dominguez-Pery, Carine, 2017. "Product variety management and supply chain performance: A capability perspective on their relationships and competitiveness implications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 15-26.
    9. Wan, Xiang & Britto, Rodrigo & Zhou, Zenan, 2020. "In search of the negative relationship between product variety and inventory turnover," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. Huang, Shui-Mu & Su, Jack C.P., 2013. "Impact of product proliferation on the reverse supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 626-639.
    11. Yu, Yugang & Huang, George Q., 2010. "Nash game model for optimizing market strategies, configuration of platform products in a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) supply chain for a product family," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 361-373, October.
    12. Sampath Rajagopalan, 2013. "Impact of Variety and Distribution System Characteristics on Inventory Levels at U.S. Retailers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 191-204, May.
    13. Park, Kijung & Okudan Kremer, Gül E., 2015. "Assessment of static complexity in design and manufacturing of a product family and its impact on manufacturing performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 215-232.
    14. Sheth, Ananya & Sinfield, Joseph V., 2022. "An analytical framework to compare innovation strategies and identify simple rules," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Kai-Lung Hui, 2004. "Product Variety Under Brand Influence: An Empirical Investigation of Personal Computer Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 686-700, May.
    16. Wang, Pengfei, 2019. "Price space and product demography: Evidence from the workstation industry, 1980–1996," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    17. Kim, Soo Wook & Park, Sangwook, 2008. "Development of a three-echelon SC model to optimize coordination costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 1044-1061, February.
    18. Patxi J. Bernales & Yongtao Guan & Harihara Prasad Natarajan & Patricia Souza Gimenez & Mario Xavier Alvarez Tajes, 2017. "Less Is More: Harnessing Product Substitution Information to Rationalize SKUs at Intcomex," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 230-243, June.
    19. Thomé, Antonio Márcio T. & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Pires, Sílvio R.I. & Ceryno, Paula & Klingebiel, Katja, 2014. "A multi-tier study on supply chain flexibility in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 91-105.
    20. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Jalali, Hamed & Lamas, Alejandro, 2021. "One too many: Product proliferation and the financial performance in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s1_127-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/conferences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.