IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/circec/v2y2022i3d10.1007_s43615-021-00137-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Augmented Reality (AR) Supporting Citizen Engagement in Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Tina Katika

    (Institute of Communication and Computer Systems of the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering)

  • Ioannis Karaseitanidis

    (Institute of Communication and Computer Systems of the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering)

  • Dimitra Tsiakou

    (Institute of Communication and Computer Systems of the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering)

  • Christos Makropoulos

    (School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens)

  • Angelos Amditis

    (Institute of Communication and Computer Systems of the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering)

Abstract

Improving the public’s awareness of and engagement with sustainable practices is essential for transitioning from a linear to a circular economy (CE). This task is not trivial; however, research into new ways of effectively supporting awareness and engagement, especially in view of digitalization trends, is still missing. In this study, we investigate the ability of augmented reality (AR) technology to improve awareness of CE practices and to engage citizens, inclusively, in the CE approach. Specifically, we report on the development of a novel AR engagement tool and present the results of two studies undertaken using this tool to assess the reliability and validity of this engagement practice. The first study focuses on the citizens of a municipality in Greece, and the second focuses on the general public outside the municipality boundaries. Attributes related to user engagement, such as novelty, aesthetics, perceived usability, endurability, focused attention, self-efficacy, perceived learning, and interest in the topic, were assessed, as were factors affecting these attributes related to the participants’ knowledge of CE principles and exposure to similar technologies. The two studies indicate that the AR engagement tool increased social inclusion and community cohesion and was able to successfully bring CE principles and benefits to the public’s attention. Higher engagement levels were observed in participants who had limited exposure to the concept of CE prior to using the AR tool, and its use was found to improve their confidence and interest in CE. This study aspires to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the use of mobile AR and to support further evidence-based development of digital tools for public awareness and engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Tina Katika & Ioannis Karaseitanidis & Dimitra Tsiakou & Christos Makropoulos & Angelos Amditis, 2022. "Augmented Reality (AR) Supporting Citizen Engagement in Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:2:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s43615-021-00137-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-021-00137-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43615-021-00137-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43615-021-00137-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith Petts, 2001. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deliberative Processes: Waste Management Case-studies," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 207-226.
    2. Walter R. Stahel, 2016. "The circular economy," Nature, Nature, vol. 531(7595), pages 435-438, March.
    3. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2010. "The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 50-69, January.
    4. Perlaviciute, Goda & Steg, Linda, 2014. "Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 361-381.
    5. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2008. "What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(6), pages 938-955, April.
    6. Heather L. O'Brien & Elaine G. Toms, 2010. "The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(1), pages 50-69, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandra Neri & Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Simone Franzò & Vikas Kumar & Tommaso Lampertico & Carlo Andrea Bassani, 2023. "The role of digital technologies in supporting the implementation of circular economy practices by industrial small and medium enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4693-4718, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nripesh Trivedi & Daniel Adomako Asamoah & Derek Doran, 2018. "Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 239-257, April.
    2. Zixing Shen & Michael J. Pritchard, 2022. "Cognitive engagement on social media: A study of the effects of visual cueing in educational videos," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(9), pages 1253-1267, September.
    3. Heather L. O'Brien, 2017. "Antecedents and learning outcomes of online news engagement," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2809-2820, December.
    4. Bitrián, Paula & Buil, Isabel & Catalán, Sara, 2021. "Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 170-185.
    5. Carolina Herrando & Julio Jiménez-Martínez & María José Martín-De Hoyos, 2017. "Passion at first sight: how to engage users in social commerce contexts," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 701-720, December.
    6. Nripesh Trivedi & Daniel Adomako Asamoah & Derek Doran, 0. "Keep the conversations going: engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    7. Simona VINEREAN & Alin OPREANA, 2015. "Consumer Engagement in Online Settings: Conceptualization and Validation of Measurement Scales," Expert Journal of Marketing, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(2), pages 35-50.
    8. Pagani, Margherita & Malacarne, Giovanni, 2017. "Experiential Engagement and Active vs. Passive Behavior in Mobile Location-based Social Networks: The Moderating Role of Privacy," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 133-148.
    9. Zhuojun Gu & Ravi Bapna & Jason Chan & Alok Gupta, 2022. "Measuring the Impact of Crowdsourcing Features on Mobile App User Engagement and Retention: A Randomized Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1297-1329, February.
    10. Omar Besbes & Yonatan Gur & Assaf Zeevi, 2016. "Optimization in Online Content Recommendation Services: Beyond Click-Through Rates," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 15-33, February.
    11. Orland Hoeber & Morgan Harvey & Shaheed Ahmed Dewan Sagar & Matthew Pointon, 2022. "The effects of simulated interruptions on mobile search tasks," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 777-796, June.
    12. Shelly Rathee & Kritika Narula & Arul Mishra & Himanshu Mishra, 2023. "Alphanumeric vs. Numeric Token Systems and the Healthcare Experience: Field Evidence from Healthcare Delivery in India," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1180-1221, February.
    13. Makram Soui & Mabrouka Chouchane & Narjes Bessghaier & Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer & Marouane Kessentini, 2022. "On the Impact of Aesthetic Defects on the Maintainability of Mobile Graphical User Interfaces: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 659-676, April.
    14. Tamilla Triantoro & Ram Gopal & Raquel Benbunan-Fich & Guido Lang, 0. "Personality and games: enhancing online surveys through gamification," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-10.
    15. Jong-Long Guo & Hsiao-Pei Hsu & Mei-Hsun Lin & Cheng-Yu Lin & Chiu-Mieh Huang, 2020. "Testing the Usability of Digital Educational Games for Encouraging Smoking Cessation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Caitríona Ní Shé & Eabhnat Ní Fhloinn & Ciarán Mac an Bhaird, 2023. "Student Engagement with Technology-Enhanced Resources in Mathematics in Higher Education: A Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-34, February.
    17. Grant, Stephanie M. & Hodge, Frank D. & Sinha, Roshan K., 2018. "How disclosure medium affects investor reactions to CEO bragging, modesty, and humblebragging," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 118-134.
    18. Diana R. Sanchez & Markus Langer, 2020. "Video Game Pursuit (VGPu) Scale Development: Designing and Validating a Scale With Implications for Game-Based Learning and Assessment," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(1), pages 55-86, February.
    19. Tamilla Triantoro & Ram Gopal & Raquel Benbunan-Fich & Guido Lang, 2020. "Personality and games: enhancing online surveys through gamification," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 169-178, September.
    20. Leticia Regueiro & Richard Newton & Mohamed Soula & Diego Méndez & Björn Kok & David C. Little & Roberto Pastres & Johan Johansen & Martiña Ferreira, 2022. "Opportunities and limitations for the introduction of circular economy principles in EU aquaculture based on the regulatory framework," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 2033-2044, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:circec:v:2:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s43615-021-00137-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.