IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-1-349-04378-1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A Note on the Gain from Trade

In: Fundamental Issues in Trade Theory

Author

Listed:
  • J. S. Metcalfe
  • Ian Steedman

Abstract

The object of this essay is to investigate the nature of the gain or loss from trade in capitalist economies that are in long-run stationary equilibrium.1 The analysis may be considered an extension of recent theoretical work which has rightly emphasised the role of produced means of production in the general equilibrium analysis of trade,2 although we depart from current analysis in allowing for the impact of a positive rate of interest upon the equilibrium properties of the economies we discuss. It must be made clear that we shall be investigating the gain from trade in two entirely different senses. First, we consider two separate economies identical in all respects, except that one is in a state of autarky while the other is engaged in international trade at given international prices; the gain from trade is derived in familiar fashion by comparing the stationary equilibrium characteristics of the two economies. Secondly, we investigate the gain from trade within the context of a single economy that is initially in a state of autarky and is then unexpectedly faced with the option of trade at given international prices. We are here investigating the gain from trade in terms of the capitalists’ investment decision, weighing together the ‘gains’ and ‘losses’ of the unexpected switch from autarky to trade. The important feature of this analysis is that it takes account of the impact upon attainable consumption of the transition from autarkic to with-trade steady states.

Suggested Citation

  • J. S. Metcalfe & Ian Steedman, 1979. "A Note on the Gain from Trade," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Ian Steedman (ed.), Fundamental Issues in Trade Theory, chapter 4, pages 47-63, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-04378-1_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-04378-1_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Bruno & Edwin Burmeister & Eytan Sheshinski, 1966. "The Nature and Implications of the Reswitching of Techniques," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(4), pages 526-553.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asim Erdilek, 1977. "The Problem of Deadweight Loss in the International Trade of Growing Capitalist Economies," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 113(II), pages 171-191, June.
    2. Cláudio Gontijo, 2000. "The Ricardian theory of international trade: a criticism," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG td141, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dilip Madan & Eugene Seneta, 1990. "On the monotonicity of the labour-capital ratio in Sraffa's model," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 101-107, February.
    2. Saverio M. Fratini, 2010. "Reswitching And Decreasing Demand For Capital," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 676-682, November.
    3. Kazuhiro Kurose & Naoki Yoshihara, 2018. "The Heckscher—Ohlin—Samuelson Trade Theory and the Cambridge Capital Controversies: On the Validity of Factor Price Equalisation Theorem," Working Papers SDES-2018-17, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Nov 2018.
    4. Kurose, Kazuhiro & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2016. "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model and the Cambridge Capital Controversies," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2016-05, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    5. Carlo Milana, 2019. "Solving the Reswitching Paradox in the Sraffian Theory of Capital," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 97-125, November.
    6. James E. Foster & Tapan Mitra, 2003. "Ranking investment projects," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 22(3), pages 469-494, October.
    7. Cameron Harwick, 2022. "Unmixing the metaphors of Austrian capital theory," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 163-176, June.
    8. Stefano Zambelli, 2014. "Aggregate Production Functions and Neoclassical Properties: An Empirical Verification," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1405, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    9. Zambelli, Stefano & Fredholm, Thomas & Venkatachalam, Ragupathy, 2017. "Robust measurement of national technological progress," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 38-55.
    10. Bidard, Christian & Salvadori, Neri, 1995. "Duality between prices and techniques," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 379-389, June.
    11. Kurose, Kazuhiro & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2018. "The Heckscher—Ohlin—Samuelson Trade Theory and the Cambridge Capital Controversies: On the Validity of Factor Price Equalisation Theorem," Discussion Paper Series 686, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    12. Carlo Milana, 2024. "Refuting Samuelson’s capitulation on the re-switching of techniques in the Cambridge capital controversy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 179-197, June.
    13. Mariolis, Theodore, 2010. "A neo-Ricardian critique of the traditional static theory of trade, customs unions and common markets," MPRA Paper 23088, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Quaas, Georg, 2025. "Joint technological changes in multiple industries," Working Papers 182, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Economics and Management Science.
    15. Michael Osborne & Ian Davidson, 2016. "The Cambridge capital controversies: contributions from the complex plane," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 251-269, April.
    16. Saverio M. Fratini, 2019. "On The Second Stage Of The Cambridge Capital Controversy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1073-1093, September.
    17. Ulrich van Suntum, "undated". "Dynamic Efficiency and Reswitching," Working Papers 200122, Institute of Spatial and Housing Economics, Munster Universitary.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-04378-1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.