IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/mgt/micp11/801-823.html

Supply Chain Performance Measurement Framework for Manufacturing Industries – A Theoretical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ilkka Sillanpaa

    (Konecranes Oyj, Finland)

  • Pekka Kess

    (University of Oulu, Finland)

Abstract

The article addresses the issues of Supply Chain (SC) performance measurement – the process of qualifying the efficiency and effectiveness of the supply chain. The aim of this study is to create a supply chain measurement framework for the manufacturing industry. This study creates a framework for supply chain measurement by presenting the main theory framework for such measurement. It is stated that supply chain performance measurement is extremely important in developing the supply chain. The measurement framework in this study offers guidelines for measuring the supply chain in the manufacturing industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilkka Sillanpaa & Pekka Kess, 2011. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement Framework for Manufacturing Industries – A Theoretical Approach," MIC 2011: Managing Sustainability? Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Portorož, 23–26 November 2011 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgt:micp11:801-823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-266-112-0/papers/MIC4196.pdf
    File Function: full text in English
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-266-113-7.pdf
    File Function: Conference Programme with Abstracts
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Otto, Andreas & Kotzab, Herbert, 2003. "Does supply chain management really pay? Six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 306-320, January.
    2. Beamon, Benita M., 1998. "Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 281-294, August.
    3. Kamalini Ramdas & Robert E. Spekman, 2000. "Chain or Shackles: Understanding What Drives Supply-Chain Performance," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 3-21, August.
    4. Gunasekaran, A. & Patel, C. & McGaughey, Ronald E., 2004. "A framework for supply chain performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 333-347, February.
    5. Waggoner, Daniel B. & Neely, Andy D. & P. Kennerley, Mike, 1999. "The forces that shape organisational performance measurement systems: An interdisciplinary review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 53-60, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ogulin, R. & Selen, W. & Ashayeri, J., 2010. "Determinants of Informal Coordination in Networked Supply Chains," Discussion Paper 2010-133, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Ogulin, R. & Selen, W. & Ashayeri, J., 2010. "Determinants of Informal Coordination in Networked Supply Chains," Other publications TiSEM 6bbf5984-752c-4760-b899-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Ivakina, A. & Zenkevich, N., 2018. "Working capital optimization under liquidity constraints in collaborative supply chains," Working Papers 15110, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    4. Braz, Renata Gomes Frutuoso & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Martins, Roberto Antonio, 2011. "Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 751-760, October.
    5. Juneho Um, 2017. "The impact of supply chain agility on business performance in a high level customization environment," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 10-19, June.
    6. Luís Alberto Godinho Coelho & Rui Manuel Mendes Mansidão, 2014. "Logistics Performance: a Theoretical Conceptual Model for Small and Medium Enterprises," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2014_12, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
    7. Li, Gang & Yang, Hongjiao & Sun, Linyan & Ji, Ping & Feng, Lei, 2010. "The evolutionary complexity of complex adaptive supply networks: A simulation and case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 310-330, April.
    8. Seiler, A. & Papanagnou, C. & Scarf, P., 2020. "On the relationship between financial performance and position of businesses in supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Rajesh K. Singh & Hari Om Sharma & Suresh K. Garg, 2016. "Study on Supply Chain Issues in an Auto Component Manufacturing Organization: Case Study," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1196-1210, October.
    10. Shao, Junyang & Moser, Roger & Henke, Michael, 2012. "Multidimensional supply performance framework: A conceptual development and empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 26-34.
    11. Hsin Chang & Chung-Jye Hung & Kit Wong & Chin-Ho Lee, 2013. "Using the balanced scorecard on supply chain integration performance—a case study of service businesses," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(4), pages 539-561, December.
    12. Ching-Chin Chern & Tzi-Yuan Chou & Bo Hsiao, 2016. "Assessing the efficiency of supply chain scheduling algorithms using data envelopment analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 823-856, November.
    13. Mathieu Bécue & Jean Belin & Damien Talbot, 2014. "Relational rent and underperformance of hub firms in the aeronautics value chain," Post-Print halshs-02337588, HAL.
    14. Hald, Kim Sundtoft & Mouritsen, Jan, 2018. "The evolution of performance measurement systems in a supply chain: A longitudinal case study on the role of interorganisational factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 256-271.
    15. Rajesh Katiyar & M. K. Barua & Purushottam L. Meena, 2018. "Analysing the Interactions Among the Barriers of Supply Chain Performance Measurement: An ISM with Fuzzy MICMAC Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(1), pages 48-68, February.
    16. Amit Kumar Marwah & Girish Thakar & R. C. Gupta, 2014. "Determinants of Supply Chain Performance of Indian Manufacturing Organizations," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 5(1), pages 14-27, February.
    17. Wen-Lung Shiau & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Chia-Han Tsai, 2015. "Supply chain management: exploring the intellectual structure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 215-230, October.
    18. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Maccarrone, Paolo & Caniato, Federico, 2017. "Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 299-315.
    19. Estampe, Dominique & Lamouri, Samir & Paris, Jean-Luc & Brahim-Djelloul, Sakina, 2013. "A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 247-258.
    20. Tram Anh Thi Nguyen & Thuy Lan Nguyen & Quynh Trang Thi Nguyen & Kim Anh Thi Nguyen & Curtis M. Jolly, 2023. "Measuring Supply Chain Performance for Khanh Hoa Sanest Soft Drink Joint Stock Company: An Application of the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:micp11:801-823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.