IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pwe345.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Gregory J. Werden

Personal Details

First Name:Gregory
Middle Name:J.
Last Name:Werden
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pwe345
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Antitrust Division
Department of Justice
Government of the United States

Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
http://www.justice.gov/atr/



JUDICIARY +CENTER BUILDING 555 4TH ST. N.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20001
RePEc:edi:atrgvus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Gregory J. WERDEN, 1997. "Simulating The Effects Of Differentiated Products Mergers: A Practitioners' Guide," Department of Resource Economics Regional Research Project 967, University of Massachusetts.
  2. Froeb, L.M. & Werden, G.J., 1997. "A Robust test for Consumer Welfare Enhancing Mergers Among Sellers of a Homogeneous Product," Papers 97-1, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  3. Crooke, P. & Froeb, L.M. & Tschantz, S. & Werden, G.J., 1997. "Effects of the Assumed Demand System on Simulated Postmerger Equilibrium," Papers 97-3, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  4. Werden, G.J., 1996. "Demand Elasticities in Antitrust Analysis," Papers 96-11, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  5. Werden, G.J., 1996. "Simulating the Effects of Differentiated Products Mergers," Papers 96-02, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  6. Werden, G.J., 1996. "A Robust Test for Consumer Welfare Enhancing Mergers Among Sellers of Differentiated Products," Papers 96-01, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  7. Werden, G.J. & Froeb, L.M., 1996. "The Entry Including Effects of Horizontal Mergers," Papers 96-08, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  8. Werden, G.J. & G.J. & Froeb, L.M., 1995. "Simulation as an Alternative to Structural Merger Policy in Differentiated Products Industries," Papers 95-02, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  9. Schwartz, M. & Werden, G.J., 1995. "A Quality-Signaling Rationale for Aftermarket Tying," Papers 95-01, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  10. Werden, G.J. & Froeb, L.M. & Tardiff, T.J., 1994. "The Use of the Logit Model in Applied Industrial Organization," Papers 94-1, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  11. Froeb, L. & Werden, G.J. & Tardiff, T.J., 1993. "The Demsetz Postulate and the Effects of Mergers in Differentiated Products Industries," Papers 93-5, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  12. Werden, G.J. & Koyak, R.A. & Froeb, L.M., 1993. "What Is the Effect of Bid-Rigging on Prices," Papers 93-2, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  13. Hay, G.A. & Werden, G.J., 1993. "Horizontal Mergers: Law, Policy, and Economies," Papers 93-1, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  14. Werden, G.J. & Froeb, L.M., 1993. "The Effects of Mergers in Differentiated products Industries: Logit Demand and Structural Merger Policy," Papers 93-4, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  15. Werden, G.J., 1992. "The History of Antitrust Market Delineation," Papers 92-8, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  16. Froeb, L.M. & Werden, G.J., 1991. "Correlation, Causality, and all that Jazz: The Inherent Shortcomings of Price Tests for Antitrust Market Delineation," Papers 91-6, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  17. Werden, G.J., 1990. "Antitrust Policy Toward Horizontal Mergers: A Comment On Farrell And Shapiro," Papers 90-4, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  18. Froeb, L.M. & Werden, G.J., 1990. "Market Delineation Under The Merger Guidelines: The Role Of Residual Demand Elasticities," Papers 90-3, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  19. Werden, G.J., 1990. "Four Suggestions On Market Delineation," Papers 90-5, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  20. Joskow, A.S. & Werden, G.J. & Johnson, R.L., 1990. "Entry, Exit, And Performance In Airline Market," Papers 90-10, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
  21. Philip Crooke, Luke Froeb, & Steven Tschantz & Gregory J. Werden, "undated". "Computing Post Merger Nash Equilibria: Local vs. Global Demand Properties," Computing in Economics and Finance 1997 127, Society for Computational Economics.

Articles

  1. Bernhard Ganglmair & Luke M. Froeb & Gregory J. Werden, 2012. "Patent Hold-Up and Antitrust: How A Well-Intentioned Rule Could Retard Innovation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 249-273, June.
  2. Gregory J. Werden, 2011. "The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Market for Corporate Control," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 167(1), pages 168-173, March.
  3. Gregory J. Werden & Luke M. Froeb & Mikhael Shor, 2011. "Behavioral Antitrust and Merger Control," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 167(1), pages 126-142, March.
  4. Gregory Werden, 2008. "Assessing the Effects of Antitrust Enforcement in the United States," De Economist, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 433-451, December.
  5. Amit Gandhi & Luke Froeb & Steven Tschantz & Gregory J. Werden, 2008. "Post‐Merger Product Repositioning," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 49-67, March.
  6. Froeb, Luke & Tschantz, Steven & Werden, Gregory J., 2005. "Pass-through rates and the price effects of mergers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(9-10), pages 703-715, December.
  7. Gregory J. Werden, 2004. "Does Antitrust Policy Improve Consumer Welfare? Assessing the Evidence: Comments," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(3), pages 224-225, Summer.
  8. Gregory Werden, 2001. "Microsoft's Pricing of Windows and the Economics of Derived Demand Monopoly," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 18(3), pages 257-262, May.
  9. Gregory Werden, 2001. "Microsoft's Pricing of Windows: A Reply to Reddy, Evans, Nichols, and Schmalensee," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 18(3), pages 269-271, May.
  10. Gregory Werden, 2000. "Market Delineation under the Merger Guidelines: Monopoly Cases and Alternative Approaches," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 16(2), pages 211-218, March.
  11. Werden, Gregory J., 2000. "Market Monitoring by Regional Transmission Organizations: What Role Should They Play in Detecting and Mitigating Market Power?," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 26-31, October.
  12. Gregory Werden, 2000. "Expert Report in United States v. Interstate Bakeries Corp. and Continental Baking Co," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 139-148.
  13. Luke Froeb & Gregory Werden, 2000. "An Introduction to the Symposium on the Use of Simulation in Applied Industrial Organization," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 133-137.
  14. Gregory Werden & Luke Froeb & James Langenfeld, 2000. "Lost Profits from Patent Infringement: The Simulation Approach," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 213-227.
  15. Philip Crooke & Luke Froeb & Steven Tschantz & Gregory Werden, 1999. "Effects of Assumed Demand Form on Simulated Postmerger Equilibria," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 15(3), pages 205-217, November.
  16. Froeb, Luke M. & Werden, Gregory J., 1998. "A robust test for consumer welfare enhancing mergers among sellers of a homogeneous product," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 367-369, March.
  17. Werden, Gregory J, 1996. "A Robust Test for Consumer Welfare Enhancing Mergers among Sellers of Differentiated Products," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 409-413, December.
  18. Gregory Werden & Luke Froeb & Timothy Tardiff, 1996. "The Use of the Logit Model in Applied Industrial Organization," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 83-105.
  19. Joskow, Andrew S. & Werden, Gregory J. & Johnson, Richard L., 1994. "Entry, exit, and performance in airline markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 457-471, December.
  20. Werden, Gregory J & Froeb, Luke M, 1994. "The Effects of Mergers in Differentiated Products Industries: Logit Demand and Merger Policy," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 407-426, October.
  21. Evans, William N & Froeb, Luke M & Werden, Gregory J, 1993. "Endogeneity in the Concentration-Price Relationship: Causes, Consequences, and Cures," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 431-438, December.
  22. Hay, George A & Werden, Gregory J, 1993. "Horizontal Mergers: Law, Policy, and Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(2), pages 173-177, May.
  23. Froeb, Luke M. & Koyak, Robert A. & Werden, Gregory J., 1993. "What is the effect of bid-rigging on prices?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 419-423.
  24. Werden, Gregory J, 1991. "Horizontal Mergers: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(4), pages 1002-1006, September.
  25. Pittman, Russell W. & Werden, Gregory J., 1990. "The divergence of SIC industries from antitrust markets : Indications from Justice Department merger cases," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 283-286, July.
  26. Werden, Gregory J., 1990. "The limited relevance of patient migration data in market delineation for hospital merger cases," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 363-376, February.
  27. Werden, Gregory J. & Williams, Michael A., 1989. "Can the concentration-collusion hypothesis be refuted empirically?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 253-257, September.
  28. Werden, Gregory J., 1988. "The divergence of SIC industries from antitrust markets : Some evidence from price fixing cases," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 193-197.
  29. Werden, Gregory J & Baumann, Michael G, 1986. "A Simple Model of Imperfect Competition in Which Four Are Few but Three Are Not," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 331-335, March.
  30. Hirschey, Mark John & Werden, Gregory J., 1979. "Managerial incentives in the financial sector," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 269-274.
  31. Michael Rothschild & Gregory J. Werden, 1979. "Returns to Scale From Random Factor Services: Existence and Scope," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 329-335, Spring.
    RePEc:bla:jindec:v:46:y:1998:i:4:p:525-43 is not listed on IDEAS

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Gregory J. Werden should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.