IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pru328.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Michael Rushton

Personal Details

First Name:Michael
Middle Name:
Last Name:Rushton
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pru328
https://spea.indiana.edu/faculty-research/directory/profiles/faculty/full-time/rushton-michael.html

Affiliation

School of Public and Environmental Affairs
Indiana University

Bloomington, Indiana (United States)
http://www.spea.indiana.edu/
RePEc:edi:spiiuus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters

Working papers

  1. Rushton, M., 1997. "The Moral Rights of Artists: Droit Moral ou Droit Pecuniaire?," Papers 76, Regina - Department of Economics.
  2. Rushton, M., 1991. "Tax Policy and Business Investment: What Have we Learned in the Past Dozen Years?," Papers 38, Regina - Department of Economics.
  3. Rushton, M., 1990. "The Linear Quadratic Model of Dynamic Input Demand: Estimates with Canadian Manufacturing Data," Papers 32, Regina - Department of Economics.
  4. Rushton, M., 1990. "The Multivariate Flexible Accelerator Model of Input Demand: Estimates with Canadian Manufacturing Data," Papers 33, Regina - Department of Economics.

Articles

  1. Michael Rushton, 2017. "Sigrid Hemels and Kazuko Goto (eds.): Tax incentives for the creative industries," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(4), pages 489-491, November.
  2. Sam Cameron & Michael Rushton, 2008. "Editorial," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(4), pages 241-242, December.
  3. Michael Rushton, 2008. "Victor A. Ginsburgh and David Throsby (eds): Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Vol. 1," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 79-81, March.
  4. Christine H. Roch & Michael Rushton, 2008. "Racial Context and Voting over Taxes," Public Finance Review, , vol. 36(5), pages 614-634, September.
  5. Michael Rushton, 2008. "Editorial," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 1-1, March.
  6. Michael Rushton, 2008. "Who pays? Who benefits? Who decides?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(4), pages 293-300, December.
  7. Michael Rushton, 2007. "Editorial," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 31(1), pages 1-1, March.
  8. Michael Rushton, 2006. "John Carey: What Good are the Arts?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 30(4), pages 317-319, December.
  9. Michael Rushton, 2004. "Tyler Cowen: 2002, Creative Destruction: How Globalization is Changing the World's Cultures," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 28(1), pages 81-83, February.
  10. Michael Rushton, 2002. "Richard E. Caves, Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 26(1), pages 82-84, February.
  11. Michael Rushton, 2001. "The Law and Economics of Artists' Inalienable Rights," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 25(4), pages 243-257, November.
  12. Michael Rushton, 2000. "Public Funding of Controversial Art," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 24(4), pages 267-282, November.
  13. Michael Rushton, 2000. "John W. O'Hagan, The State and the Arts: An Analysis of Key Economic Policy Issues in Europe and the United States," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 24(2), pages 165-167, May.
  14. Michael Rushton, 1999. "Paul Kearns, The Legal Concept of Art," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 23(4), pages 333-334, November.
  15. Michael Rushton, 1999. "Methodological Individualism and Cultural Economics," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 23(3), pages 137-146, August.
  16. Michael Rushton, 1998. "The Moral Rights of Artists: Droit Moral ou Droit Pécuniaire?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(1), pages 15-32, March.
  17. Michael Rushton, 1997. "Simon Frith, Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 21(2), pages 158-159, June.
  18. Michael Rushton, 1997. "When in Rome ... Amending Canada's Copyright Act," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 23(3), pages 317-330, September.

Chapters

  1. Michael Rushton, 2011. "Artists’ Rights," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  2. Michael Rushton, 2011. "Pricing the Arts," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 49, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  3. Michael Rushton, 2010. "Federal Tax Policy," Chapters, in: Bruce A. Seaman & Dennis R. Young (ed.), Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics and Management, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  4. Michael Rushton, 2003. "Artistic freedom," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  5. Michael Rushton, 2002. "Copyright and freedom of expression: an economic analysis," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), Copyright in the Cultural Industries, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Rushton, M., 1997. "The Moral Rights of Artists: Droit Moral ou Droit Pecuniaire?," Papers 76, Regina - Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Ruth Towse, 2010. "Creativity, Copyright and the Creative Industries Paradigm," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 461-478, August.
    2. Melissa Boyle & Stacy Nazzaro & Debra O’Connor, 2010. "Moral rights protection for the visual arts," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 34(1), pages 27-44, February.
    3. Michael Rushton, 2003. "Artists' rights," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Ruth Towse, 2008. "Why has cultural economics ignored copyright?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(4), pages 243-259, December.
    5. Ruth Towse, 2006. "Copyright And Artists: A View From Cultural Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 567-585, September.
    6. Robert B. Ekelund & Richard Higgins & John D. Jackson, 2020. "ART as meta-credence: authentication and the role of experts," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(1), pages 155-171, March.
    7. Michael Rushton, 1999. "Methodological Individualism and Cultural Economics," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 23(3), pages 137-146, August.

Articles

  1. Christine H. Roch & Michael Rushton, 2008. "Racial Context and Voting over Taxes," Public Finance Review, , vol. 36(5), pages 614-634, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Russell Weaver, 2015. "The Racial Context of Convenience Voting Cutbacks," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440155, August.
    2. John M. Foster, 2013. "Voter Ideology, Economic Factors, and State and Local Tax Progressivity," Public Finance Review, , vol. 41(2), pages 177-202, March.
    3. Gabriel Heller‐Sahlgren, 2023. "Group threat and voter turnout: Evidence from a refugee placement program," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 470-504, July.
    4. John M. Foster & Jacob Fowles, 2018. "Ethnic Heterogeneity, Group Affinity, and State Higher Education Spending," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(1), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Russel Weaver & Sharmistha Bagchi-Sen, 2015. "Racially Polarized Voting in a Southern U.S. Election: How Urbanization and Residential Segregation Shape Voting Patterns," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 45(1), pages 15-34, Spring.

  2. Michael Rushton, 2008. "Who pays? Who benefits? Who decides?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(4), pages 293-300, December.

    Cited by:

    1. John O'Hagan, 2011. "Tax Concessions," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 57, Edward Elgar Publishing.

  3. Michael Rushton, 2001. "The Law and Economics of Artists' Inalienable Rights," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 25(4), pages 243-257, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Melissa Boyle & Stacy Nazzaro & Debra O’Connor, 2010. "Moral rights protection for the visual arts," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 34(1), pages 27-44, February.
    2. Michael Rushton, 2003. "Artists' rights," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Francesco Angelini & Massimiliano Castellani & Pierpaolo Pattitoni, 2023. "You can’t export that! Export ban for modern and contemporary Italian art," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 533-557, December.
    4. Ruth Towse, 2008. "Why has cultural economics ignored copyright?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(4), pages 243-259, December.
    5. Ruth Towse, 2006. "Copyright And Artists: A View From Cultural Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 567-585, September.

  4. Michael Rushton, 2000. "Public Funding of Controversial Art," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 24(4), pages 267-282, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Joseph J. Cordes & Robert S. Goldfarb, 2007. "Decreasing the "Bad" for Mixed Public Goods and Bads: The Case of Public Sculpture," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 159-176, Spring.
    2. Bartosz Jusypenko & Aleksandra Wiśniewska, 2020. ""I go, I pay". The role of experience in recognizing the need for public financing of cultural goods," Working Papers 2020-04, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    3. Michael Rushton, 2003. "Artists' rights," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Rushton, Michael, 2022. "The Economic Approach to Public Funding for the Arts," MPRA Paper 113405, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Michael Rushton, 2003. "Artistic freedom," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.

  5. Michael Rushton, 1999. "Methodological Individualism and Cultural Economics," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 23(3), pages 137-146, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Lauren Haaften-Schick & Amy Whitaker, 2022. "From the Artist’s Contract to the blockchain ledger: new forms of artists’ funding using equity and resale royalties," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(2), pages 287-315, June.
    2. Bronwyn Coate & Robert Hoffmann, 2022. "The behavioural economics of culture," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(1), pages 3-26, March.
    3. Michael Rushton, 2000. "Public Funding of Controversial Art," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 24(4), pages 267-282, November.
    4. Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2002. "Cultural heritage as multi-dimensional, multi-value and multi-attribute economic good: toward a new framework for economic analysis and valuation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 529-558.
    5. Clément, Valérie & Moureau, Nathalie & Vidal, Marion, 2009. "À la recherche des biens sous tutelle," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 85(4), pages 383-401, décembre.
    6. Elodie Brahic & Valérie Clément & Nathalie Moureau & Marion Vidal, 2008. "A la recherche des Merit Goods," Working Papers 08-08, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, revised Jun 2008.

  6. Michael Rushton, 1998. "The Moral Rights of Artists: Droit Moral ou Droit Pécuniaire?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(1), pages 15-32, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Michael Rushton, 1997. "When in Rome ... Amending Canada's Copyright Act," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 23(3), pages 317-330, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Michael Rushton, 1998. "The Moral Rights of Artists: Droit Moral ou Droit Pécuniaire?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 22(1), pages 15-32, March.
    2. Michael Rushton, 1999. "Methodological Individualism and Cultural Economics," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 23(3), pages 137-146, August.

Chapters

  1. Michael Rushton, 2011. "Artists’ Rights," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Cited by:

    1. Ruth Towse, 2006. "Copyright And Artists: A View From Cultural Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 567-585, September.

  2. Michael Rushton, 2010. "Federal Tax Policy," Chapters, in: Bruce A. Seaman & Dennis R. Young (ed.), Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics and Management, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Cited by:

    1. Michael Rushton, 2008. "Who pays? Who benefits? Who decides?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(4), pages 293-300, December.
    2. James Alm & Daniel Teles, 2017. "State and Federal Tax Policy toward Nonprofit Organizations," Working Papers 1704, Tulane University, Department of Economics.

  3. Michael Rushton, 2002. "Copyright and freedom of expression: an economic analysis," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), Copyright in the Cultural Industries, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Cited by:

    1. Michael Rushton, 2003. "Artistic freedom," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Michael Rushton should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.