IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/spr/mathfi/v18y2024i1d10.1007_s11579-024-00356-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Nash equilibria for relative investors with (non)linear price impact

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole Bäuerle

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT))

  • Tamara Göll

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT))

Abstract

We consider the strategic interaction of n investors who are able to influence a stock price process and at the same time measure their utilities relative to the other investors. Our main aim is to find Nash equilibrium investment strategies in this setting in a financial market driven by a Brownian motion and investigate the influence the price impact has on the equilibrium. We consider both CRRA and CARA utility functions. Our findings show that the problem is well-posed as long as the price impact is at most linear. Moreover, numerical results reveal that the investors behave very aggressively when the price impact is close to a critical parameter.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Bäuerle & Tamara Göll, 2024. "Nash equilibria for relative investors with (non)linear price impact," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 2, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:mathfi:v:18:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11579-024-00356-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11579-024-00356-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11579-024-00356-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11579-024-00356-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Hua & Mamaysky, Harry, 2005. "Dynamic trading policies with price impact," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 891-930, May.
    2. Robert A. Jarrow, 2008. "Market Manipulation, Bubbles, Corners, and Short Squeezes," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Financial Derivatives Pricing Selected Works of Robert Jarrow, chapter 6, pages 105-130, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Curatola, Giuliano, 2022. "Price impact, strategic interaction and portfolio choice," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Xiangge Luo & Alexander Schied, 2018. "Nash equilibrium for risk-averse investors in a market impact game with transient price impact," Papers 1807.03813, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.
    5. Suleyman Basak & Dmitry Makarov, 2014. "Strategic Asset Allocation in Money Management," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 179-217, February.
    6. Robert A. Jarrow, 2008. "Derivative Security Markets, Market Manipulation, and Option Pricing Theory," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Financial Derivatives Pricing Selected Works of Robert Jarrow, chapter 7, pages 131-151, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Guanxing Fu & Xizhi Su & Chao Zhou, 2020. "Mean Field Exponential Utility Game: A Probabilistic Approach," Papers 2006.07684, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    8. Peter Bank & Dietmar Baum, 2004. "Hedging and Portfolio Optimization in Financial Markets with a Large Trader," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Guanxing Fu & Chao Zhou, 2023. "Mean field portfolio games," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 189-231, January.
    10. Alexander Kempf & Stefan Ruenzi, 2008. "Tournaments in Mutual-Fund Families," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 1013-1036, April.
    11. Goncalo dos Reis & Vadim Platonov, 2020. "Forward utility and market adjustments in relative investment-consumption games of many players," Papers 2012.01235, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    12. Guanxing Fu, 2023. "Mean field portfolio games with consumption," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 4, February.
    13. Henrik Cronqvist & Rüdiger Fahlenbrach, 2009. "Large Shareholders and Corporate Policies," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(10), pages 3941-3976, October.
    14. Suhan Altay & Katia Colaneri & Zehra Eksi, 2017. "Portfolio optimization for a large investor controlling market sentiment under partial information," Papers 1706.03567, arXiv.org.
    15. Alexander Schied & Tao Zhang, 2019. "A Market Impact Game Under Transient Price Impact," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 102-121, February.
    16. Guanxing Fu & Paulwin Graewe & Ulrich Horst & Alexandre Popier, 2021. "A Mean Field Game of Optimal Portfolio Liquidation," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 1250-1281, November.
    17. Daniel Lacker & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2019. "Mean field and n‐agent games for optimal investment under relative performance criteria," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1003-1038, October.
    18. Zehra Eksi & Hyejin Ku, 2017. "Portfolio optimization for a large investor under partial information and price impact," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 86(3), pages 601-623, December.
    19. Stephen J. Brown & William N. Goetzmann & James Park, 2001. "Careers and Survival: Competition and Risk in the Hedge Fund and CTA Industry," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(5), pages 1869-1886, October.
    20. Gilles-Edouard Espinosa & Nizar Touzi, 2015. "Optimal Investment Under Relative Performance Concerns," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 221-257, April.
    21. Kraft, Holger & Kühn, Christoph, 2011. "Large traders and illiquid options: Hedging vs. manipulation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1898-1915.
    22. Alexander Schied & Elias Strehle & Tao Zhang, 2015. "High-frequency limit of Nash equilibria in a market impact game with transient price impact," Papers 1509.08281, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    23. Liu, Hong & Yong, Jiongmin, 2005. "Option pricing with an illiquid underlying asset market," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 2125-2156, December.
    24. Alexander Schied & Tao Zhang, 2017. "A State-Constrained Differential Game Arising In Optimal Portfolio Liquidation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 779-802, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicole Bauerle & Tamara Goll, 2023. "Nash equilibria for relative investors with (non)linear price impact," Papers 2303.18161, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    2. Curatola, Giuliano, 2022. "Price impact, strategic interaction and portfolio choice," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. Panagiotis E. Souganidis & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2024. "Mean field games with unbounded controlled common noise in portfolio management with relative performance criteria," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 10, February.
    4. Nicole Bauerle & Tamara Goll, 2025. "Relative portfolio optimization via a value at risk based constraint," Papers 2503.20340, arXiv.org.
    5. Nicole Bäuerle & Tamara Göll, 2023. "Nash equilibria for relative investors via no-arbitrage arguments," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 97(1), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Bo, Lijun & Wang, Shihua & Yu, Xiang, 2024. "A mean field game approach to equilibrium consumption under external habit formation," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Kraft, Holger & Kühn, Christoph, 2011. "Large traders and illiquid options: Hedging vs. manipulation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1898-1915.
    8. Suhan Altay & Katia Colaneri & Zehra Eksi, 2017. "Portfolio optimization for a large investor controlling market sentiment under partial information," Papers 1706.03567, arXiv.org.
    9. Moritz Voß, 2022. "A two-player portfolio tracking game," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 16, number 6, February.
    10. Michail Anthropelos & Tianran Geng & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2020. "Competition in Fund Management and Forward Relative Performance Criteria," Papers 2011.00838, arXiv.org.
    11. Chao Deng & Xizhi Su & Chao Zhou, 2024. "Peer effect and dynamic ALM games among insurers," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 11, February.
    12. Gu Wang & Jiaxuan Ye, 2023. "Fund Managers’ Competition for Investment Flows Based on Relative Performance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 605-643, August.
    13. Zongxia Liang & Keyu Zhang, 2024. "A mean field game approach to relative investment–consumption games with habit formation," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 2, February.
    14. Michail Anthropelos & Scott Robertson & Konstantinos Spiliopoulos, 2018. "Optimal Investment, Demand and Arbitrage under Price Impact," Papers 1804.09151, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    15. Sergey Lototsky & Henry Schellhorn & Ran Zhao, 2016. "A String Model of Liquidity in Financial Markets," Papers 1608.05900, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    16. Masaaki Fujii & Masashi Sekine, 2023. "Mean-field Equilibrium Price Formation with Exponential Utility," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1210, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    17. Ludovic Tangpi & Xuchen Zhou, 2022. "Optimal Investment in a Large Population of Competitive and Heterogeneous Agents," Papers 2202.11314, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    18. Zongxia Liang & Keyu Zhang, 2023. "Time-inconsistent mean field and n-agent games under relative performance criteria," Papers 2312.14437, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    19. Moritz Vo{ss}, 2019. "A two-player portfolio tracking game," Papers 1911.05122, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    20. Fu, Guanxing & Horst, Ulrich & Xia, Xiaonyu, 2022. "Portfolio Liquidation Games with Self-Exciting Order Flow," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 327, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Portfolio optimization; Price impact; Nash equilibrium; Relative investor;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mathfi:v:18:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11579-024-00356-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.