IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/wzbmtn/327875.html

Fairer als gedacht: Keine Nachteile für Frauen in Berufungsverfahren

Author

Listed:
  • Rusconi, Alessandra
  • Solga, Heike

Abstract

Der Wettbewerb ist hart, die Anforderungen hoch. Auch heute noch gibt es in Deutschland deutlich mehr Professoren als Professorinnen. Werden Frauen bei Berufungen benachteiligt, weil ihre Leistung geringer bewertet wird als die von Männern? Eine experimentelle Studie macht Hoffnung: Bei gleicher Qualifikation haben Frauen sogar einen kleinen Vorteil. Das ist auch ein Erfolg der zahlreichen Maßnahmen an den Universitäten.

Suggested Citation

  • Rusconi, Alessandra & Solga, Heike, 2023. "Fairer als gedacht: Keine Nachteile für Frauen in Berufungsverfahren," WZB-Mitteilungen: Quartalsheft für Sozialforschung, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, issue 182 (4/23, pages 38-41.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbmtn:327875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/327875/1/f-25877_repo.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew B. Ross & Britta M. Glennon & Raviv Murciano-Goroff & Enrico G. Berkes & Bruce A. Weinberg & Julia I. Lane, 2023. "Author Correction: Women are credited less in science than men," Nature, Nature, vol. 621(7979), pages 41-41, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gavin Cook, 2026. "Towards a Sociology of Sociology: Inequality, Elitism, and Prestige in the Sociological Enterprise From 1970 to the Present," Papers 2601.04579, arXiv.org.
    2. Hoekman, Jarno & Rake, Bastian, 2024. "Geography of authorship: How geography shapes authorship attribution in big team science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    3. Francisca M. Antman & Kirk B. Doran & Xuechao Qian & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2024. "Half Empty and Half Full? Women in Economics and the Rise in Gender-Related Research," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 114, pages 226-231, May.
    4. Gabriela Fontanarrosa & Lucía Zarbá & Valeria Aschero & Daniel Andrés Dos Santos & María Gabriela Nuñez Montellano & Maia C Plaza Behr & Natalia Schroeder & Silvia Beatriz Lomáscolo & María Elisa Fanj, 2024. "Over twenty years of publications in Ecology: Over-contribution of women reveals a new dimension of gender bias," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Kahn, Shulamit & MacGarvie, Megan, 2024. "New evidence on international postdocs in the US: Less pay, different experiences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(9).
    6. repec:osf:socarx:w34pr_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:osf:osfxxx:yr8me_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Muhammad Asim & Peter Muriuki Gatheru & Joy J Chebet & Mehr G Shah & Anna Thorson & Vanessa Brizuela, 2023. "Support, networks, and relationships: Findings from a mixed-methods evaluation of a mentorship programme for early career women researchers in sexual and reproductive health and rights," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Letki, Natalia & Biały, Grzegorz & Sankowski, Piotr & Walentek, Dawid, 2022. "Streamlining for excellence discriminates against women: A study of research productivity of 2.7 mln scientists in 45 countries," OSF Preprints yr8me, Center for Open Science.
    10. Nakajima, Kazuki & Liu, Ruodan & Shudo, Kazuyuki & Masuda, Naoki, 2023. "Quantifying gender imbalance in East Asian academia: Research career and citation practice," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    11. Rainer Widmann & Michael E. Rose & Marina Chugunova, 2023. "Allegations of Sexual Misconduct, Accused Scientists, and Their Research," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 419, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    12. Cory Koedel & Trang Pham, 2023. "The Narrowing Gender Wage Gap Among Faculty at Public Universities in the U.S," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    13. Nikola Komlenac & Liora Neugebauer & Jennifer Birke & Margarethe Hochleitner, 2023. "All employees benefit: arguments that help increase support for affirmative action in academic careers," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Nancy Reid, 2024. "On Sufficiency and Ancillarity," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 86(1), pages 160-172, November.
    15. Manuel S. Mariani & Federico Battiston & Emőke-Ágnes Horvát & Giacomo Livan & Federico Musciotto & Dashun Wang, 2024. "Collective dynamics behind success," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Abramitzky, Ran & Greska, Lena & Pérez, Santiago & Price, Joseph & Schwarz, Carlo & Waldinger, Fabian, 2024. "Climbing the Ivory Tower: How Socio-Economic Background Shapes Academia," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 739, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    17. Tal Seidel Malkinson & Devin B Terhune & Mathew Kollamkulam & Maria J Guerreiro & Dani S Bassett & Tamar R Makin, 2023. "Gender imbalances in the editorial activities of a selective journal run by academic editors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Amirali Karimi & Catherine Beaudry & Vincent Larivière, 2026. "Scientists on the move: The impact of collaboration with different mobility groups on the performance of Canadian scientists," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-63, April.
    19. Chauvin, Juan Pablo & Tricaud, Clemence, 2022. "Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12411, Inter-American Development Bank.
    20. Matte Hartog & Andres Gomez-Lievano & Ricardo Hausmann & Frank Neffke, 2024. "Inventing modern invention: the professionalization of technological progress in the US," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2408, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Apr 2024.
    21. Stansbury, Anna & Rodriguez, Kyra, 2026. "The Class Gap in Career Progression: Evidence from U.S. Academia," SocArXiv ugdjf_v1, Center for Open Science.
    22. MinSub Kim & Joyce J. Chen & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2023. "Gender pay gaps in economics: A deeper look at institutional factors," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(4), pages 471-486, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbmtn:327875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.