IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/jumsac/326971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic, culture, and corporate cost behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Gläser, Meret Anna

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered unprecedented government interventions, creating a unique setting to examine implications on corporate cost behaviour. This study explores the relationship between the stringency of government interventions during the pandemic and labour cost stickiness, as well as the moderating role of national culture, using 15,446 firm-year observations from 3,383 listed firms across 25 European countries from 2017 to 2022. A difference-in-differences regression analysis reveals that stringent interventions are related to increased labor cost stickiness, suggesting that managers view such measures as a signal of pandemic control which reduces their pessimism about future demand. Additionally, a median-based sample split shows that several dimensions of national culture moderate the relation between governmental stringency and labour cost stickiness, highlighting that culture influences how managers form future expectations based on stringent government interventions. The study connects formal institutions, i.e. governmental interventions, and informal institutions, i.e. national culture, with cost asymmetry as well as expands firm-level cost behaviour research in the context of the COVID-19 crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gläser, Meret Anna, 2025. "Government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic, culture, and corporate cost behaviour," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(3), pages 715-747.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:326971
    DOI: 10.5282/jums/v10i3pp715-747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/326971/1/1935990918.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5282/jums/v10i3pp715-747?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noreen, Eric & Noreen, Eric & Soderstrom, Naomi, 1994. "Are overhead costs strictly proportional to activity? : Evidence from hospital departments," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-2), pages 255-278, January.
    2. Ashraf, Badar Nadeem, 2020. "Economic impact of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence from financial markets," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    3. Aggarwal, Shobhit & Nawn, Samarpan & Dugar, Amish, 2021. "What caused global stock market meltdown during the COVID pandemic–Lockdown stringency or investor panic?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    4. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    5. Martin Holzhacker & Ranjani Krishnan & Matthias D. Mahlendorf, 2015. "The Impact of Changes in Regulation on Cost Behavior," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 534-566, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oh, Seungbin & Choi, Ahrum, 2025. "How does divergence of control and cash-flow rights influence cost stickiness?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    2. Gu, Yuqi & Ouyang, Bo, 2024. "Debt covenant violations and corporate cost management," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Szczygielski, Jan Jakub & Charteris, Ailie & Bwanya, Princess Rutendo & Brzeszczyński, Janusz, 2022. "The impact and role of COVID-19 uncertainty: A global industry analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Szczygielski, Jan Jakub & Charteris, Ailie & Bwanya, Princess Rutendo & Brzeszczyński, Janusz, 2023. "Which COVID-19 information really impacts stock markets?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Perote, Javier & Vicente-Lorente, José D. & Zuñiga-Vicente, Jose Angel, 2023. "How reactive is investment in US green bonds and ESG-eligible stocks in times of crisis? Exploring the COVID-19 crisis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. Lin, Yu-En & Teng, Shi & Yu, Bo & Lam, Keith S.K., 2025. "ESG rating, rating divergence and investment efficiency: International evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Sven Hartlieb & Thomas R. Loy, 2022. "The impact of cost stickiness on financial reporting: evidence from income smoothing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3913-3950, September.
    8. Josep M. Argilés-Bosch & Josep Garcia-Blandón & Diego Ravenda, 2023. "Cost behavior in e-commerce firms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2101-2134, December.
    9. Tingyong Zhong & Fangcheng Sun & Haiyan Zhou & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2020. "Business Strategy, State-Owned Equity and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Joshua Kinyamal Ole Shankil & Dr. Jane Munga, 2025. "Corporate Governance Practices and Performance of County Government of Narok; Kenya," Human Resource and Leadership Journal, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 10(6), pages 59-83.
    11. Tran, Phan Huy Hieu, 2021. "Does employee stock ownership program reduce a company’s stock volatility during the Covid-19 lockdown?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    12. Phan Huy Hieu Tran, 2021. "Does employee stock ownership program reduce a company’s stock volatility during the Covid-19 lockdown?," Post-Print hal-04881081, HAL.
    13. Katarzyna Czech & Michał Wielechowski, 2021. "Is the Alternative Energy Sector COVID-19 Resistant? Comparison with the Conventional Energy Sector: Markov-Switching Model Analysis of Stock Market Indices of Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Mark C. Anderson & Rajiv D. Banker & Surya N. Janakiraman, 2003. "Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”?," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 47-63, March.
    15. Li, Tongxia & Lu, Chun & Xu, Lei, 2025. "Access to finance and cost stickiness: Evidence from anti-recharacterization laws," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Ibrahim, Awad Elsayed Awad & Ali, Hesham & Aboelkheir, Heba, 2022. "Cost stickiness: A systematic literature review of 27 years of research and a future research agenda," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    17. Tampakoudis, Ioannis & Noulas, Athanasios & Kiosses, Nikolaos, 2022. "The market reaction to syndicated loan announcements before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of corporate governance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    18. Jia Li & Zhengying Luo, 2021. "Product market competition and cost stickiness: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1808-1821, October.
    19. David Aboody & Shai Levi & Dan Weiss, 2018. "Managerial incentives, options, and cost-structure choices," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 422-451, June.
    20. Josep Mª. Argilés‐Bosch & Josep Garcia‐Blandón & Diego Ravenda, 2023. "Empirical analysis of the relationship between labour cost stickiness and labour reforms in Spain," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(S1), pages 1187-1221, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:326971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jums.academy/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.