IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/337874.html

Street mobilisation during election campaigns in multilevel systems: a supply–demand analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Schürmann, Lennart
  • Schmidt, Leonhard

Abstract

Election campaigns are periods of heightened political competition and opportunities for change. This research note examines whether such politicisation leads to increased street mobilisation, both in terms of who organises (supply) and who participates (demand). On the supply side, a 'professionalisation' of protest is expected, with more active institutional political and civil society actors. On the demand side, participation should rise. Relying on original protest event data from Germany (2000-2023), the analysis shows that campaign periods boost protest overall. Yet responses vary by election level: all groups mobilise most during first-order national elections. Regarding second-order elections, civil society actors and citizens respond more to subnational elections, suggesting localised protest dynamics, while institutional political actors focus on EU elections. This study adds to understanding how multi-level governance shapes 'unconventional' political behaviour and highlights the alignment and divergence between citizen activism and elite strategies during election campaigns.

Suggested Citation

  • Schürmann, Lennart & Schmidt, Leonhard, 2026. "Street mobilisation during election campaigns in multilevel systems: a supply–demand analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:337874
    DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2026.2634027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/337874/1/Full-text-article-Schuermann-Schmidt-Street-mobilisation.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01402382.2026.2634027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wasow, Omar, 2020. "Agenda Seeding: How 1960s Black Protests Moved Elites, Public Opinion and Voting," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(3), pages 638-659, August.
    2. Borbáth, Endre & Hutter, Swen, 2021. "Protesting Parties in Europe: A comparative analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(5), pages 896-908.
    3. Castanho Silva, Bruno & Schürmann, Lennart & Proksch, Sven-Oliver, 2024. "Modulation of Democracy: Partisan Communication During and After Election Campaigns," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 339-354.
    4. Castanho Silva, Bruno & Schürmann, Lennart & Proksch, Sven-Oliver, 2024. "Modulation of Democracy: Partisan Communication During and After Election Campaigns," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 339-354, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schürmann, Lennart & Schwalbach, Jan & Himmelrath, Noam, 2025. "Location matters! Geospatial dynamics of MP responses to Covid‐19 protests in multilevel systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 64, pages 513-524.
    2. Weisskircher, Manès & Hutter, Swen & Borbáth, Endre, 2022. "Protest and Electoral Breakthrough: Challenger Party-Movement Interactions in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue (Latest A, pages 1-1.
    3. Zhang, Shuo, 2026. "Mass mobilization and political change: Evidence from Hong Kong," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    4. Matthew Cebul & Jonathan Pinckney, 2025. "Nonviolent alternatives reduce external support for rebel groups: Evidence from two cross-national survey experiments," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(6), pages 1839-1856, November.
    5. Christos Mavridis & Orestis Troumpounis & Maurizio Zanardi, 2022. "Protests and Police Militarization," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0122, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    6. Aitor Marcos & Saima Kazmi & Patrick Hartmann, 2026. "Disruptive Climate Protests Against Companies: Analyzing Customer Perceptions in an Experimental Setting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 400-414, January.
    7. Dimitar Gueorguiev & Dongshu Liu, 2024. "Double standard: Chinese public opinion on the Hong Kong protests," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 41(4), pages 343-364, July.
    8. Markus Ostarek & Lennart Klein & Cathy Rogers & James Ozden & Laura Thomas-Walters, 2025. "Short and long-term effects of disruptive animal rights protest," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Charles Butcher & Jonathan Pinckney, 2022. "Friday on My Mind: Re-Assessing the Impact of Protest Size on Government Concessions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(7-8), pages 1320-1355, August.
    10. Anderson, D. Mark & Charles, Kerwin Kofi & Karbownik, Krzysztof & Rees, Daniel I. & Steffens, Camila, 2025. "Civil rights protests and election outcomes: Exploring the effects of the poor people’s campaign," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Thomas Zeitzoff & Grace Gold, 2024. "Cyber and contentious politics: Evidence from the US radical environmental movement," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 134-149, January.
    12. Joshua Conrad Jackson & Yuanze Liu & Nour Kteily, 2026. "The widening partisan gap in legislative support for civil rights in the United States," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Joost Berkhout & Jan Beyers & Marcel Hanegraaff, 2023. "The Representative Potential of Interest Groups: Internal Voice in Post-Communist and Western European Countries," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 50-64.
    14. Kimberly Turner & Kiela Crabtree, 2021. "Reclaiming the public space," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3127-3134, December.
    15. Oscar Nupia Mart√≠nez & Carlos Andr√©s √Ålvarez Gallo, 2024. "The Impact of Massive Protests on Individual Attitudes," Documentos CEDE 21190, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    16. Pomerenke, David, 2023. "How do protests shape discourse? Causal methods for determining the impact of protest events on newspaper coverage," SocArXiv z2qbc, Center for Open Science.
    17. Brox, Enzo & Krieger, Tommy, 2025. "Far-right mass protests and their effects on internal migration," ZEW Discussion Papers 25-045, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Sargis Karavardanyan, 2024. "Economic Development, Inequality and Dynamics of Social Movements in the United States: Theory and Quantitative Analysis," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 22(2), pages 421-474, June.
    19. Bocar A. Ba & Abdoulaye Ndiaye & Roman G. Rivera & Alexander Whitefield, 2024. "Mispricing Narratives after Social Unrest," Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Institute Working Papers 096, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    20. Gollust, Sarah E. & Haselswerdt, Jake, 2021. "A crisis in my community? Local-level awareness of the opioid epidemic and political consequences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:337874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.