IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/325856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pressure and praise as an action research methodology: The case of Fairwork

Author

Listed:
  • Graham, Mark
  • Alyanak, Oğuz
  • Bertolini, Alessio
  • Feuerstein, Patrick
  • Kuttler, Tobias
  • Ustek Spilda, Funda
  • Valente, Jonas

Abstract

In platform-mediated sectors such as ride-hailing, delivery, care work and cloudwork, gig workers often lack essential employment protections such as minimum wage and social security. Misclassification of workers, opaque algorithms, exploitation of legal loopholes and lobbying by platforms against protective legislation further exacerbates inequalities and discrimination. The Fairwork project at the University of Oxford and WZB Berlin, in collaboration with a global network of partners, aims to improve conditions in the platform economy through action research. Using a principles-based framework, the project evaluates and scores platforms against universal standards of fairness – fair pay, fair conditions, fair contracts, fair management and fair representation. The action-research methodology combines data triangulation and stakeholder engagement to ensure platform evaluations are objective and impartial, while seeking to hold platforms accountable and advocating for better labour standards in the gig economy. This article explores Fairwork as an action research methodology that has established positive feedback loops, driving platforms towards pro-worker policy changes. We hope this discussion encourages other politically engaged social scientists to adopt action research approaches in their own work.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham, Mark & Alyanak, Oğuz & Bertolini, Alessio & Feuerstein, Patrick & Kuttler, Tobias & Ustek Spilda, Funda & Valente, Jonas, 2025. "Pressure and praise as an action research methodology: The case of Fairwork," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:325856
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X251336893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/325856/1/Full-text-article-Graham-Alyanak-Pressure-and-praise.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X251336893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessio Bertolini & Ruth Dukes, 2021. "Trade Unions and Platform Workers in the UK: Worker Representation in the Shadow of the Law," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 50(4), pages 662-688.
    2. Ernest Cañada & Carla Izcara & María José Zapata Campos, 2023. "Putting Fairness into the Gig Economy: Delivery Cooperatives as Alternatives to Corporate Platforms," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Pietro Ghirlanda & Vassil Kirov, 2024. "An alternative organizational model for a more democratic and equitable digital economy: A systematic literature review on platform cooperativism through the lens of stakeholder theory. Competitive ad," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 1197-1221, December.
    4. Andrew Stewart & Jim Stanford, 2017. "Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 420-437, September.
    5. Sergey Naumov & David Keith, 2023. "Optimizing the economic and environmental benefits of ride‐hailing and pooling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 904-929, March.
    6. Otto Kassi & Vili Lehdonvirta & Fabian Stephany, 2021. "How Many Online Workers are there in the World? A Data-Driven Assessment," Papers 2103.12648, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    7. Gianluca Iazzolino & Nicole Stremlau, 2024. "AI for social good and the corporate capture of global development," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 626-643, October.
    8. repec:osf:socarx:78nge_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Datta, Namita & Rong, Chen & Singh, Sunamika & Stinshoff, Clara & Iacob, Nadina & Nigatu, Natnael Simachew & Nxumalo, Mpumelelo & Klimaviciute, Luka, 2023. "Working Without Borders: The Promise and Peril of Online Gig Work," Jobs Group Papers, Notes, and Guides 32573393, The World Bank.
    10. Valentin Niebler & Giorgio Pirina & Michelangelo Secchi & Franco Tomassoni, 2023. "Towards ‘bogus employment?’ The contradictory outcomes of ride-hailing regulation in Berlin, Lisbon and Paris," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(2), pages 289-301.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Desmond Ayentimi & Albert Amankwaa & John Burgess, 2025. "The Emerging Gig Economy and Sustainable Development in Sub-Saharan Africa," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Kazakova, E. & Sandomirskaia, M. & Suvorov, A. & Khazhgerieva, A. & Shavshin, R., 2023. "Platforms, online labor markets, and crowdsourcing. Part 1. Traditional online labor market," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 60(3), pages 120-148.
    3. Fazio, Maria Victoria & Freund, Richard & Novella, Rafael, 2025. "Do entrepreneurial skills unlock opportunities for online freelancing? Experimental evidence from El Salvador," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Al James, 2024. "Platform work‐lives in the gig economy: Recentering work–family research," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 513-534, March.
    5. Mohamed Mousa & Walid Chaouali & Monowar Mahmood, 2023. "The Inclusion of Gig Employees and their Career Satisfaction: Do Individual and Collaborative Job Crafting Play a Role?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1055-1068, September.
    6. John Burgess & Julia Connell, 2020. "New technology and work: Exploring the challenges," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 310-323, September.
    7. Alex Veen & Tom Barratt & Caleb Goods, 2020. "Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 388-406, June.
    8. Santana, Monica & Cobo, Manuel J., 2020. "What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 846-862.
    9. Tom Barratt & Caleb Goods & Alex Veen, 2020. "‘I’m my own boss…’: Active intermediation and ‘entrepreneurial’ worker agency in the Australian gig-economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(8), pages 1643-1661, November.
    10. S. Ramesh & C. Shobha, 2025. "Unequal gigs: developing a scale to measure socio-economic disparities among gig workers," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 52(3), pages 355-368, September.
    11. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    12. Miray Erinc Oztas, 2024. "Migrant Women in the UK’s Digital Economy: The Elimination of Labour Market Barriers in the Digital Labour Market," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, September.
    13. Daniel Belanche & Luis V. Casaló & Carlos Flavián & Alfredo Pérez-Rueda, 2021. "The role of customers in the gig economy: how perceptions of working conditions and service quality influence the use and recommendation of food delivery services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(1), pages 45-75, March.
    14. Paola Tubaro & Antonio A. Casilli & Maxime Cornet & Clément Le Ludec & Juana Torres Cierpe, 2025. "Where does AI come from? A global case study across Europe, Africa, and Latin America," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 359-372, May.
    15. Chiara Belletti & Daniel Erdsiek & Ulrich Laitenberger & Paola Tubaro, 2021. "Crowdworking in France and Germany," Working Papers hal-03468022, HAL.
    16. Anna Davies & Betsy Donald & Mia Gray, 2023. "The power of platforms—precarity and place," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(2), pages 245-256.
    17. Zoe Hitzig & Benjamin Niswonger, 2022. "Optimal Defaults, Limited Enforcement and the Regulation of Contracts," Papers 2203.01233, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    18. Harry Moroz & Mariana Viollaz, 2024. "The Future of Work in Central America and the Dominican Republic," World Bank Publications - Reports 42043, The World Bank Group.
    19. Martins, Antje & Riordan, Tyler & Dolnicar, Sara, 2020. "A post-COVID-19 model of tourism and hospitality workforce resilience," SocArXiv 4quga, Center for Open Science.
    20. Bilgrami, A. & Cutler, H. & Sinha, K., 2021. "Do standardised workplace health and safety laws and increased enforcement activities reduce the probability of receiving workers' compensation?," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 21/08, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:325856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.