IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/122387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Öffentlichkeit als Mobilisierungsfaktor für soziale Bewegungen

Author

Listed:
  • Rucht, Dieter

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rucht, Dieter, 1994. "Öffentlichkeit als Mobilisierungsfaktor für soziale Bewegungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 337-358.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:122387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/122387/1/209840.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rucht, Dieter, 1994. "Modernisierung und neue soziale Bewegungen: Deutschland, Frankreich und USA im Vergleich," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 32, number 122892.
    2. Eisinger, Peter K., 1973. "The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(1), pages 11-28, March.
    3. Lipsky, Michael, 1968. "Protest as a Political Resource," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 1144-1158, December.
    4. Kitschelt, Herbert P., 1986. "Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 57-85, January.
    5. Breton, Albert & Breton, Raymond, 1969. "An Economic Theory of Social Movements," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 198-205, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Jing & Chang, I-Shin & Yilihamu, Qimanguli & Zhou, Yu, 2017. "Study on the practice of public participation in environmental impact assessment by environmental non-governmental organizations in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 186-200.
    2. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Satyapriya Rout & Annu Yudik, 2021. "Environmental Movements in North-East India: Political Opportunity Structure and Movement Success," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 26(2), pages 226-246, December.
    5. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Cornelia Woll, 2006. "Lobbying in the European Union: From Sui Generis to a Comparative Perspective," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/8523, Sciences Po.
    7. Artís, Annalí Casanueva & Avetian, Vladimir & Sardoschau, Sulin & Saxena, Kavya, 2022. "Social Media and the Broadening of Social Movements: Evidence from Black Lives Matter," IZA Discussion Papers 15812, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Manlio Cinalli, 2003. "Socio‐politically polarized contexts, urban mobilization and the environmental movement: a comparative study of two campaigns of protest in Northern Ireland," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 158-177, March.
    9. Cornelia Woll, 2006. "Lobbying in the European Union: From Sui Generis to a Comparative Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01021182, HAL.
    10. Roller, Edeltraud & Weßels, Bernhard, 1996. "Contexts of political protest in Western democracies: Political organization and modernity," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 96-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Jakob Anton Luger, 2015. "Ein neues Werkzeug: Die Europäische Bürgerinitiative am Fallbeispiel von „right2water“," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 4, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    12. Thibault Daudigeos & Thomas Roulet & Bertrand Valiorgue, 2020. "How Scandals Act as Catalysts of Fringe Stakeholders' Contentious Actions against Multinational Corporations," Post-Print hal-03041023, HAL.
    13. Zachrisson, Anna & Beland Lindahl, Karin, 2019. "Political opportunity and mobilization: The evolution of a Swedish mining-sceptical movement," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Xiaojie Zhang & Lili Wang, 2022. "Factors Contributing to Citizens’ Participation in COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China: An Integrated Model Based on Theory of Planned Behavior, Norm Activation Model, and Political Opportunity S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Watanabe, Tsutomu, 2007. "International comparison on the occurrence of social movements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 806-812, July.
    16. Cornelia Woll, 2006. "Lobbying in the European Union: From Sui Generis to a Comparative Perspective," Post-Print hal-01021182, HAL.
    17. Peter J. Phillips & Gabriela Pohl, 2021. "Crowd counting: a behavioural economics perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2253-2270, December.
    18. Jung-In Jo & Hyun Jin Choi, 2019. "Enigmas of grievances about inequality: Effects of attitudes toward inequality and government redistribution on protest participation," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 22(4), pages 348-368, December.
    19. H.V. Savitch & Grigoriy Ardashev, 2001. "Does Terror Have an Urban Future?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2515-2533, December.
    20. Newton, Kenneth & Giebler, Heiko, 2008. "Patterns of participation: Political and social participation in 22 nations," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Democracy and Democratization SP IV 2008-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    21. Sierra, Jazmin & Hochstetler, Kathryn, 2017. "Transnational activist networks and rising powers: transparency and environmental concerns in the Brazilian National Development Bank," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 79089, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    22. Koopmans, Ruud, 1998. "The use of protest event data in comparative research: cross-national comparability, sampling methods and robustness," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 90-110.
    23. Livia Johannesson & Noomi Weinryb, 2021. "How to blame and make a difference: perceived responsibility and policy consequences in two Swedish pro-migrant campaigns," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 41-62, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:122387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.