IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/market/v36y2024i2p229-245.html

The Importance of Individual Benefits – Understanding Patient Behaviour in E-Health Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • József Ráti

    (University of Public Service)

  • Ildikó Kemény

    (Corvinus University of Budapest)

  • Péter Simon

    (Corvinus University of Budapest)

Abstract

Purpose – Advancements in telemedicine offer the potential to enhance healthcare efficiency, accessibility, quality, and environmental impact. However, the shift from traditional interpersonal healthcare to technology-mediated services necessitates a nuanced understanding of the factors influencing patient behavior. Design/Methodology/Approach – This research study extends the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine telemedicine adoption patterns. Beyond conventional TAM elements such as a positive attitude and technological readiness, the investigation scrutinizes the influences of social and individual benefits, alongside the impact of COVID-19 anxiety, specifically within the Central and Eastern European context. This methodological expansion and regional focus provide unique insights into the research domain. Utilizing regression analysis on data collected through an online survey, the study highlights the substantial influence of individual benefits and positive attitudes on the adoption of telemedicine technologies. Findings and implications – Perceived social benefits do not exhibit a statistically significant effect. These findings emphasize the need for tailored awareness initiatives that underscore the personal advantages of e-health solutions while addressing prevalent skepticism surrounding technology. Limitations – The findings are limited by the representativeness of the sample, as it over-represents young, educated women, urban residents, and individuals with a higher socioeconomic status. Originality – The insights derived from this study contribute to the growing body of knowledge aimed at facilitating a seamless integration of telemedicine technologies into healthcare frameworks within the targeted region.

Suggested Citation

  • József Ráti & Ildikó Kemény & Péter Simon, 2024. "The Importance of Individual Benefits – Understanding Patient Behaviour in E-Health Adoption," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 36(2), pages 229-245.
    • Handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:229-245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/473064
    Download Restriction: None
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Zubair Elahi & Gao Liang & Muhammad Jawad Malik & Sana Dilawar & Bena Ilyas, 2021. "Fear of Covid-19 and Intentions towards Adopting E-Health Services: Exploring the Technology Acceptance Model in the Scenario of Pandemic," International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, Conscientia Beam, vol. 8(4), pages 270-291.
    2. Meuter, Matthew L. & Ostrom, Amy L. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Roundtree, Robert, 2003. "The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 899-906, November.
    3. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    4. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    5. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    6. Anol Bhattacherjee & Neset Hikmet, 2007. "Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 725-737, December.
    7. Leung, Louis & Chen, Cheng, 2019. "E-health/m-health adoption and lifestyle improvements: Exploring the roles of technology readiness, the expectation-confirmation model, and health-related information activities," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 563-575.
    8. Adi Alsyouf & Abdalwali Lutfi & Nizar Alsubahi & Fahad Nasser Alhazmi & Khalid Al-Mugheed & Rami J. Anshasi & Nora Ibrahim Alharbi & Moteb Albugami, 2023. "The Use of a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict Patients’ Usage of a Personal Health Record System: The Role of Security, Privacy, and Usability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Chung-Feng Liu & Yung-Chieh Tsai & Fong-Lin Jang, 2013. "Patients’ Acceptance towards a Web-Based Personal Health Record System: An Empirical Study in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Muhammad Zubair Elahi & Gao Liang & Muhammad Jawad Malik & Sana Dilawar & Bena Ilyas, 2021. "Fear of Covid-19 and Intentions towards Adopting E-Health Services: Exploring the Technology Acceptance Model in the Scenario of Pandemic," International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, Conscientia Beam, vol. 8(4), pages 270-291.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markus Blut & Cheng Wang, 2020. "Technology readiness: a meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 649-669, July.
    2. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    3. Gabriel JIPA, 2018. "Mobile Applications Buying Opinions Exploration using Topic Modeling," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(2), pages 44-55.
    4. Siti Salwa Mohd Ishak & Sidney Newton, 2018. "Testing a Model of User Resistance Towards Technology Adoption in Construction Organizations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    6. Yang, Byunghwa & Kim, Youngchan & Yoo, Changjo, 2013. "The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1345-1352.
    7. Müller-Seitz, Gordon & Dautzenberg, Kirsti & Creusen, Utho & Stromereder, Christine, 2009. "Customer acceptance of RFID technology: Evidence from the German electronic retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 31-39.
    8. Minseok Choi & Kyeongseok Han & Jeongil Choi, 2015. "The effects of product attributes and service quality of transportation card solutions on service user’s continuance and word-of-mouth intention," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(3), pages 463-490, September.
    9. Garaus, Marion & Wolfsteiner, Elisabeth & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Shoppers' acceptance and perceptions of electronic shelf labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3687-3692.
    10. Alam, Mohammad Zahedul & Hu, Wang & Kaium, Md Abdul & Hoque, Md Rakibul & Alam, Mirza Mohammad Didarul, 2020. "Understanding the determinants of mHealth apps adoption in Bangladesh: A SEM-Neural network approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    11. Hoon S. Cha & Jong Hyun Wi & Chanhi Park & Taeha Kim, 2021. "Sustainability Calculus in Adopting Smart Speakers—Personalized Services and Privacy Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Yang-Chieh Chin, 2016. "Consumer Acceptance of Online Complaint Forms: An Integration of TPB, TAM and Values Perspective," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 265-279, December.
    13. Yuan Tang & Yu-Tao Yang & Yun-Fei Shao, 2019. "Acceptance of Online Medical Websites: An Empirical Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Donglin Han & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Hao Wu & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Modelling Tourists’ Acceptance of Hotel Experience-Enhancement Smart Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Janarthanan Balakrishnan & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Laurie Hughes & Frederic Boy, 2024. "Enablers and Inhibitors of AI-Powered Voice Assistants: A Dual-Factor Approach by Integrating the Status Quo Bias and Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 921-942, June.
    16. He Tingting, 2025. "It’s Not the AI, It’s Us: Individual Concerns and the Challenge of AI Adoption in Organizations," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 56(2), pages 65-85.
    17. Kathrin Dudenhöffer, 2013. "Why electric vehicles failed," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 95-124, July.
    18. Julian M. Müller, 2019. "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing—A Study across Europe, China, and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Rolfsen Christian Nordahl & Lassen Ann Karina, 2020. "On-site inspections: the shift from forms to digital capture," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2064-2071, January.
    20. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:229-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanja Komarac The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tanja Komarac to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.