IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jikmxx/v17y2018i01ns0219649218500090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Balanced Particle Swarm Optimisation for Load Scheduling in Cloud Computing

Author

Listed:
  • Divya Chaudhary

    (Department of Computer Engineering, Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Dwarka, New Delhi 110078, India)

  • Bijendra Kumar

    (Department of Computer Engineering, Netaji Subhas Institute of Technology, Dwarka, New Delhi 110078, India)

Abstract

The cloud computing is an augmentative and progressive paradigm that supports a huge amount of characteristics. It demands the optimal allocation of resources to the tasks present in the virtual machines (VMs) system using load scheduling algorithms. The basic objective of load scheduling is to avoid system overloading and thereby achieve higher throughput by maximising VM utilisation along with cost stabilisation. The first come first serve and min–min approaches allocate the load in a static manner and resources are left underutilised. The particle swarm optimisation obtains the motivation from the social behaviour of the flock of birds. It analyses various approaches for load scheduling. The paper proposes an improved balanced load scheduling approach based on particle swarm optimisation (BPSO) to minimise total transfer time and total cost stabilisation. The proposed BPSO approach is compared with the existing approaches used for load scheduling in cloudlets. The efficiency in terms of the transfer time and cost of the proposed algorithm is showcased with the help of simulation results. As evident from the results, the proposed algorithm reduces transfer time and cost than the prevalent algorithms thereby making a system with stable cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Divya Chaudhary & Bijendra Kumar, 2018. "A New Balanced Particle Swarm Optimisation for Load Scheduling in Cloud Computing," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:17:y:2018:i:01:n:s0219649218500090
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219649218500090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219649218500090
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219649218500090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tasgetiren, M. Fatih & Liang, Yun-Chia & Sevkli, Mehmet & Gencyilmaz, Gunes, 2007. "A particle swarm optimization algorithm for makespan and total flowtime minimization in the permutation flowshop sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1930-1947, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sündüz Dağ, 2013. "An Application On Flowshop Scheduling," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 1(1), pages 47-56, December.
    2. Albert Corominas & Alberto García-Villoria & Rafael Pastor, 2013. "Metaheuristic algorithms hybridised with variable neighbourhood search for solving the response time variability problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 296-312, July.
    3. Jacomine Grobler & Andries Engelbrecht & Schalk Kok & Sarma Yadavalli, 2010. "Metaheuristics for the multi-objective FJSP with sequence-dependent set-up times, auxiliary resources and machine down time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 165-196, November.
    4. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "Local search methods for the flowshop scheduling problem with flowtime minimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 31-43.
    5. Quang Chieu Ta & Jean-Charles Billaut & Jean-Louis Bouquard, 2018. "Matheuristic algorithms for minimizing total tardiness in the m-machine flow-shop scheduling problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 617-628, March.
    6. Tseng, Lin-Yu & Lin, Ya-Tai, 2009. "A hybrid genetic local search algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 84-92, October.
    7. Jakubik, Johannes & Binding, Adrian & Feuerriegel, Stefan, 2021. "Directed particle swarm optimization with Gaussian-process-based function forecasting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 157-169.
    8. Pan, Quan-Ke & Gao, Liang & Li, Xin-Yu & Gao, Kai-Zhou, 2017. "Effective metaheuristics for scheduling a hybrid flowshop with sequence-dependent setup times," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 303(C), pages 89-112.
    9. Boonmee, Atiwat & Sethanan, Kanchana, 2016. "A GLNPSO for multi-level capacitated lot-sizing and scheduling problem in the poultry industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 652-665.
    10. Zühal Kartal & Mohan Krishnamoorthy & Andreas T. Ernst, 2019. "Heuristic algorithms for the single allocation p-hub center problem with routing considerations," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 99-145, March.
    11. Shesh Narayan Sahu & Yuvraj Gajpal & Swapan Debbarma, 2018. "Two-agent-based single-machine scheduling with switchover time to minimize total weighted completion time and makespan objectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 623-640, October.
    12. Qi, Jie & Rong, Zhihai, 2013. "The emergence of scaling laws search dynamics in a particle swarm optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(6), pages 1522-1531.
    13. Pagnozzi, Federico & Stützle, Thomas, 2019. "Automatic design of hybrid stochastic local search algorithms for permutation flowshop problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 409-421.
    14. G I Zobolas & C D Tarantilis & G Ioannou, 2009. "A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for the job shop scheduling problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(2), pages 221-235, February.
    15. Tseng, Lin-Yu & Lin, Ya-Tai, 2010. "A genetic local search algorithm for minimizing total flowtime in the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 121-128, September.
    16. Tseng, Chao-Tang & Liao, Ching-Jong, 2008. "A discrete particle swarm optimization for lot-streaming flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 360-373, December.
    17. Etgar, Ran & Gelbard, Roy & Cohen, Yuval, 2017. "Optimizing version release dates of research and development long-term processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 642-653.
    18. Zhou, Hong & Cheung, Waiman & Leung, Lawrence C., 2009. "Minimizing weighted tardiness of job-shop scheduling using a hybrid genetic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(3), pages 637-649, May.
    19. Anghinolfi, Davide & Paolucci, Massimo, 2009. "A new discrete particle swarm optimization approach for the single-machine total weighted tardiness scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 73-85, February.
    20. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:17:y:2018:i:01:n:s0219649218500090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jikm/jikm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.