IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitmx/v12y2015i03ns0219877015400027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Note on a Heuristic Procedure to Identify the Most Valuable Chain of Patent Priority Network

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Hsin Chang

    (Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, 168 Jifeng E. Rd., Wufeng District, Taichung, 41349 Taiwan, Republic of China)

  • Kuei-Kuei Lai

    (Department of Graduate Institute of Business Administration, Chaoyang University of Technology, 168 Jifeng E. Rd., Wufeng District, Taichung, 41349 Taiwan, Republic of China)

  • Wen-Goang Yang

    (Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, 168 Jifeng E. Rd., Wufeng District, Taichung, 41349 Taiwan, Republic of China)

  • Ming-Chung Yang

    (Department of Business Administration, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, No. 57, Sec. 2 Zhongshan Rd., Taiping District, Taichung, 41170 Taiwan, Republic of China)

Abstract

A patent portfolio is more valuable than a single patent. However, the analysis approach of a company's patent portfolio is still ambiguous. The patent priority approach (PPA) presented a clearer analysis method to explore the interior of a patent family; patent families provide an outline of the patent portfolio. A patent priority analysis (PPA) could give a better picture of the patent portfolio path, and provide technical tracks through the patent family priorities. This paper evaluates the patent family priority network (PFPN), by joining whole patent family members to PPA. The length and quantity of the patent chain represent the depth and width of the technical developments. Special nodes are also found. When the PFPN has any "merge patents", the GR of the patent chain would fail to choose the right critical chain. A burst patent node bursts one path into several paths. SSR fails to choose the correct significant chain with burst patent nodes. Although the number of priority patents claimed by each family member (GR) and the cumulative sum of the priority patents for the patent family member (SSR) fail in the special situations, PFPN still could provide a simple, precise and broadly useful approach for technical development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Hsin Chang & Kuei-Kuei Lai & Wen-Goang Yang & Ming-Chung Yang, 2015. "Note on a Heuristic Procedure to Identify the Most Valuable Chain of Patent Priority Network," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(03), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitmx:v:12:y:2015:i:03:n:s0219877015400027
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219877015400027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219877015400027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219877015400027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ove Granstrand, 1999. "The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1651.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avlonitis, George J. & Salavou, Helen E., 2007. "Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 566-575, May.
    2. Loet Leydesdorff & Dieter Franz Kogler & Bowen Yan, 2017. "Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1573-1591, September.
    3. Fontana, Roberto & Nuvolari, Alessandro & Shimizu, Hiroshi & Vezzulli, Andrea, 2013. "Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1780-1792.
    4. Aurélie Beaugency & Mustafa Sakinç & Damien Talbot, 2015. "Externalisation de ressources et compétences stratégiques : Airbus et Boeing, des choix opposés," Post-Print halshs-02337460, HAL.
    5. Sternitzke, Christian, 2013. "An exploratory analysis of patent fencing in pharmaceuticals: The case of PDE5 inhibitors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 542-551.
    6. LeBel, Phillip, 2008. "The role of creative innovation in economic growth: Some international comparisons," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 334-347, August.
    7. Hötte, Kerstin, 2023. "Demand-pull, technology-push, and the direction of technological change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    8. Dirk Czarnitzki & Katrin Hussinger & Bart Leten, 2020. "How Valuable are Patent Blocking Strategies?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 56(3), pages 409-434, May.
    9. Geissinger, Andrea & Laurell, Christofer & Sandström, Christian, 2020. "Digital Disruption beyond Uber and Airbnb—Tracking the long tail of the sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Linus Dahlander, 2005. "Appropriation And Appropriability In Open Source Software," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 259-285.
    11. Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson, 2013. "The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 3(1), pages 3-46, June.
    12. David Moroz, 2005. "Production of Scientific Knowledge and Radical Uncertainty: The Limits of the Normative Approach in Innovation Economics," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 305-322, November.
    13. Bart Leten & Rene Belderbos & Bart Van Looy, 2016. "Entry and Technological Performance in New Technology Domains: Technological Opportunities, Technology Competition and Technological Relatedness," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1257-1291, December.
    14. Wilfred Dolfsma, 2013. "Government Failure," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15372.
    15. Mounir Amdaoud & Christian Le Bas, 2020. "Firm Patenting and Types of innovation in Least Developed Countries. An Empirical Investigation on Patenting Determinants," Working Papers hal-03059466, HAL.
    16. Tietze, Frank & Pieper, Thorsten & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2013. "To own or not to own: How ownership affects user innovation - An empirical study in the German rowing community," Working Papers 73, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    17. Cesare Righi & Timothy Simcoe, 2020. "Patenting Inventions or Inventing Patents? Continuation Practice at the USPTO," NBER Working Papers 27686, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Garcia-Vega, Maria, 2006. "Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 230-246, March.
    19. Alessandro Nuvolari, 2004. "Collective invention during the British Industrial Revolution: the case of the Cornish pumping engine," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 347-363, May.
    20. Roger Svensson, 2012. "Commercialization, renewal, and quality of patents," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 175-201, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitmx:v:12:y:2015:i:03:n:s0219877015400027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitm/ijitm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.