IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v12y2008i02ns1363919608001960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role Of Complementary Actors In The Development Of Innovation In Small Firms

Author

Listed:
  • TIM MAZZAROL

    (UWA Business School, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, Australia)

  • SOPHIE REBOUD

    (Centre for Business Research (CEREN), Groupe ESC Dijon Bourgogne (Burgundy School of Business), 29 Rue Sambin BP 50608-21006, Dijon, France)

Abstract

This study examines the findings of a survey of small, high innovator firms and their assessment of the risks and benefits of forming strategic alliances with third party "complementors". The study found that the entrepreneurs of these small innovator firms were willing to form strategic alliances where such collaboration would assist in reducing customer perceptions of risk in the adoption of their innovation, while also enhancing the customer's understanding of the innovation. However, the entrepreneur of the small firm also needed to be confident that the alliance would allow him or her to retain control over the quality of the final outcome to their customer. These findings suggest that education of the entrepreneur in the development and management of strategic networks may be a useful enhancement to the process of innovation in small firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Mazzarol & Sophie Reboud, 2008. "The Role Of Complementary Actors In The Development Of Innovation In Small Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(02), pages 223-253.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:12:y:2008:i:02:n:s1363919608001960
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919608001960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919608001960
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919608001960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeroen de Jong & Ron Kemp & Mickey Folkeringa & Wubben, 2003. "Innovation and firm performance," Scales Research Reports H200207, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    2. Maureen Lankhuizen & Rosalinde Klein Woolthuis, 2004. "The National Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation by SMEs," Scales Research Reports H200309, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    3. Hariolf Grupp & Shlomo Maital, 2001. "Managing New Product Development and Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dr. Arif Anjum, 2018. "Impact of Technology Adoption on the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in India," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 857-867:5.
    2. Kay H. Hofmann & Gregory Theyel & Craig H. Wood, 2012. "Identifying Firm Capabilities as Drivers of Environmental Management and Sustainability Practices – Evidence from Small and Medium‐Sized Manufacturers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(8), pages 530-545, December.
    3. Eugenie Byukusenge & John C. Munene, 2017. "Knowledge management and business performance: Does innovation matter?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1368434-136, January.
    4. Afris Widya-Hasuti & Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Ali Sharifara & Fausto Cavallaro, 2018. "The Role of Process Innovation between Firm-Specific Capabilities and Sustainable Innovation in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Seth Amoako & Elvis Boateng, 2022. "Considering factors that leads to sustainability of Small and Medium Enterprises in Ghana using PESTEL and theories of entrepreneurship as a measuring tool," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 31(1), pages 594-653, May.
    6. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia & Nätti, Satu, 2012. "Network orchestration for knowledge mobility: The case of an international innovation community," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 5(4), pages 244-264.
    7. repec:thr:techub:10031:y:2022:i:1:p:594-653 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Adli Abouzeedan & Magnus Klofsten & Thomas Hedner, 2013. "Internetization Management as a Facilitator for Managing Innovation in High-Technology Smaller Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 14(1), pages 121-136, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mandy Mok Kim Man, 2009. "The Relationship between Distinctive Capabilities, Strategy Types, Environment and the Export Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises of the Malaysian Manufacturing Sector," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 4(3), pages 205-223.
    2. Ornella Wanda Maietta & Fernanda Mazzotta, 2018. "Firm Survival and Innovation: Knowledge Context Matters!," CSEF Working Papers 496, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    3. Julia Naranjo-Valencia & Ricardo Vidal-Patiño & Gregorio Calderón-Hernández, 2019. "Characterization of Innovation Research Published in Latin American Journals Indexed in WoS," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(07), pages 1-38, November.
    4. Ida D'Attoma & Silvia Pacei, 2018. "Evaluating the Effects of Product Innovation on the Performance of European Firms by Using the Generalised Propensity Score," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 19(1), pages 94-112, February.
    5. Derek Bosworth & Joanne Loundes, 2002. "The Dynamic Performance of Australian Enterprises," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2002n03, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    6. Kim, Jeeeun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2015. "Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 332-345.
    7. Khorshed Alam & Adewuyi A. Adeyinka, 2021. "Does innovation stimulate performance? The case of small and medium enterprises in regional Australia," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 496-519, September.
    8. Spyros Arvanitis & Thomas Bolli, 2009. "A comparison of firm-level innovation cooperation in five European countries," KOF Working papers 09-232, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    9. Nicodemus Itivi Muthoka & Oluoch Oluoch & Paul Munene Muiruri, 2018. "The Influence of Branchless Financial Innovation on Market Capitalization of Commercial Banks Listed in NSE, Kenya," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 120-130, October.
    10. Elena Otilia Cadar & Daniel Badulescu, 2017. "Innovation And Performance. An Analysis On European And Romanian Companies," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 59-71, July.
    11. I. Haller & H. Grupp, 2009. "Demand by product characteristics: measuring solar cell quality over time," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 487-506, August.
    12. Cervantes-Zacarés, Desamparados & Martí-Sánchez, Myriam & Pascual-Soler, Marcos & Berné-Martínez, José-Miguel, 2023. "The relevance of crowdfunding in the entrepreneurial framework from a specialized media perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Jové Llopis, Elisenda & Segarra Blasco, Agustí, 1958-, 2015. "Innovation success: What is the role of innovation strategies?," Working Papers 2072/260961, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    14. Luísa Carvalho & Teresa Costa & Jorge Caiado, 2013. "Determinants of innovation in a small open economy: a multidimensional perspective," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 583-600, June.
    15. Spyros Arvanitis & Areti Gkypali & Kostas Tsekouras, 2014. "Knowledge Base, Exporting Activities, Innovation Openness and Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 14-361, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    16. Carayannis, Elias G. & Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Wurth, Bernd, 2022. "OR for entrepreneurial ecosystems: A problem-oriented review and agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 791-808.
    17. Ratnawati & Budi Eko Soetjipto & F. Danardana Murwani & Hari Wahyono, 2018. "The Role of SMEs’ Innovation and Learning Orientation in Mediating the Effect of CSR Programme on SMEs’ Performance and Competitive Advantage," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 21-38, June.
    18. Patricio Duran & Nadine Kammerlander & Marc van Essen & Thomas Zellweger, 2016. "Doing More with Less : Innovation Input and Output in Family Firms," Post-Print hal-02276703, HAL.
    19. Spyros Arvanitis, 2012. "How do different motives for R&D cooperation affect firm performance? – An analysis based on Swiss micro data," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 981-1007, November.
    20. Tomasz Ingram & Katarzyna Bratnicka-Myśliwiec & Teresa Kraśnicka & Izabella Steinerowska-Streb, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Orientation as a Determinant of Sustainable Performance in Polish Family and Non-Family Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:12:y:2008:i:02:n:s1363919608001960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.